Saturday, January 12, 2002
11:25 am
Pins, rattlesnakes and prophecy
Sometimes foresight is strange. Two years ago today Pat Buchanan wrote an article citing a Cato institute report claiming that "Americans are the principal targets of terrorists because of our constant meddling in foreign wars." What was worse was the claim "If we do not abandon our compulsive interventionism, we will one day be subjected to an act of cataclysmic terror, with a weapon of mass destruction, perhaps nuclear."
The point is that anti-interventionist authors agreed on very little indeed, but the one prediction that almost every one made was that this would lead to increased terror. Now anti-interventionists are told that we do not have the answers, because we were proved right.
Now terrorism is not in itself a reason not to do something, it is part of the price that one pays for certain courses of action. If the action is not seen as worth the price paid, then the action should not be carried out. If it is worth the price paid then we should accept the price. What is childish is to deny that the price is to be paid at all.
(Almost) everyone accepts that it was Al-Qaeda terrorists who carried out the attrocity. Al-Qaeda has said that it will target American life and property until the Americans:
1) Stop supporting Israel
2) Stop the Iraqi embargo
3) Take troops out of Saudi Arabia
This is plainly not a protest about Western values, but about American actions. The case must be made by the supporters of these actions as to why they are worth thousands of civilian deaths, and possibly thousands more.
Al Qaeda has also mentioned Britain because of its steadfast support of the United States, something the Home Secretary alluded to. The case must be made as to why "shoulder to shoulder" support for the United States is a greater national interest than the safety of our civilians, rather than the simple assumption that "we must". If the case is not good enough, then we should let America persue its own national interest in its own way.
We obviously can't run our foreign policy with the sole object of avoiding terrorism, but we have to consider the consequances of our actions abroad. As Hoover said after Pearl Harbour "You and I know that this continuous putting pins in rattlesnakes finally got this country bitten."
Sometimes foresight is strange. Two years ago today Pat Buchanan wrote an article citing a Cato institute report claiming that "Americans are the principal targets of terrorists because of our constant meddling in foreign wars." What was worse was the claim "If we do not abandon our compulsive interventionism, we will one day be subjected to an act of cataclysmic terror, with a weapon of mass destruction, perhaps nuclear."
The point is that anti-interventionist authors agreed on very little indeed, but the one prediction that almost every one made was that this would lead to increased terror. Now anti-interventionists are told that we do not have the answers, because we were proved right.
Now terrorism is not in itself a reason not to do something, it is part of the price that one pays for certain courses of action. If the action is not seen as worth the price paid, then the action should not be carried out. If it is worth the price paid then we should accept the price. What is childish is to deny that the price is to be paid at all.
(Almost) everyone accepts that it was Al-Qaeda terrorists who carried out the attrocity. Al-Qaeda has said that it will target American life and property until the Americans:
1) Stop supporting Israel
2) Stop the Iraqi embargo
3) Take troops out of Saudi Arabia
This is plainly not a protest about Western values, but about American actions. The case must be made by the supporters of these actions as to why they are worth thousands of civilian deaths, and possibly thousands more.
Al Qaeda has also mentioned Britain because of its steadfast support of the United States, something the Home Secretary alluded to. The case must be made as to why "shoulder to shoulder" support for the United States is a greater national interest than the safety of our civilians, rather than the simple assumption that "we must". If the case is not good enough, then we should let America persue its own national interest in its own way.
We obviously can't run our foreign policy with the sole object of avoiding terrorism, but we have to consider the consequances of our actions abroad. As Hoover said after Pearl Harbour "You and I know that this continuous putting pins in rattlesnakes finally got this country bitten."
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
January
(134)
- Zim Watch Surprisingly quiet. Two journalists ar...
- After a few hopeful moves, Pakistan has threatened...
- Peace among the Pashtuns According to Al-Jazera f...
- IDS is set to attack Blair for his "utopian foreig...
- Would you buy a used carpet off this man?
- A comment from my elusive colleague, Christopher M...
- Ripples from Zim So we failed to suspend Zim from...
- In Joke Has Jim Henley of Unqualified Offerings b...
- This should get you through to a Bable Fish type t...
- Breaking News They failed to suspend Mugabe from ...
- Bucket on the head time Yes, I feel like I have b...
- There was a response to the argument that Britain ...
- Bad Joke George W. Bush and Tony Blair are at a W...
- The Crack Up Things seem to be cracking up, as a ...
- Better off in? A rather counter intuitive account...
- The Zimbabwe Post allows access to its internet tr...
- One Week Left The EU have given Mugabe a week to ...
- Adieu Some feedback on my leaving: Just a note t...
- Are Atlanticists or Anglospheracists "a Fifth Colu...
- Julian the Apostate If you are interested in what...
- Zim Hots Up The opposition MDC has called off all...
- Another triumph of the United Nations. Bosnian wh...
- Two interesting essay length biographies on Palmer...
- All politics is local The news that two of the te...
- Zimmering Hardwood or diamonds, what is the real ...
- Konspiracy Korner If you enjoy good conspiracy th...
- We won? According to the Daily Telegraph that is,...
- Zim starts to boil Another daily update on Zimbab...
- In control in Afghanistan According to the Times ...
- Quiet(ish) day in Zim A couple of human rights gr...
- And the winner is... David Heathcote Amory. For ...
- Herat we go again More on the Herat situation.
- Zim redux The Soros-funded International Crisis G...
- Our reward ... for standing shoulder to shoulder....
- Say's it all From Cursor.org:
- Zimbabwe watch The ruling party revolts over the ...
- Mission Creep :The UN says they will need 30,000 ...
- For any constitution buffs out there, this ploy by...
- Shout at Africa Bringing the "Rule of Law back to...
- Beyond the Khyber It's a quiet day in Zim, so let...
- Left Wing War Blog. Shock. Lefty he may be, but ...
- Fellow columnist Christopher Montgomery's article ...
- Sadly, albeit predictably, Tony Martin has lost hi...
- The Telegraph has come out with two anti-intervent...
- On the cusp America will intervene in Zimbabwe if...
- By far the most common search that finds me is for...
- Mugabe and Free Britannia Some more feed back: E...
- Tim Cavanaugh: Let Slip the Blogs of War. Makes s...
- More feedback on Mugabe: the man is reportedly ri...
- Matthew Parris gets a couple of hits in his column...
- Feedback On my Back to Africa column: Incidently...
- A Village has been caught short of Euros. It has ...
- New Team Airstrip One is no longer a one man show...
- It looks like we're going in to Zimbabwe. The pre...
- Have a look, especially if you are one of my Ameri...
- An interesting article on perfidious Europa, writt...
- Europe is old hat According to Samizdata. Probab...
- A few comments about the Overstretch article. A c...
- Overstretch? Never. The House of Lords had a deb...
- The Bay of Brigs What's my opinion on Guantanamo ...
- Searchers Another odd Google search that turned m...
- Roland Watson on LewRockwell.com has a nice piece ...
- Andrew Dodge has e-mailed me a link to his comment...
- No change there I'm getting the feeling that the ...
- Keeping an eye on Zim The regional body, the Sout...
- The Tories condemn the British deployment in Afgha...
- Justin Raimondo goes on about warblogs. Doesn't m...
- The Times has put out a run of the mill expose of ...
- Weirdo Alert Not an Odinist this time, but an IRA...
- Strapline Have any of my esteemed readers got any...
- Will South Africa go in? I've predicted (wrongly)...
- Welcome Back Iain Murray is now back, after a dos...
- So we can't find Bin Laden. I thought that those ...
- Hippy alert
- Some news sources on Zimbabwe. The Zimbabwe Post....
- Something that didn't make it into my column, but ...
- Sense from the Tories I'm going to write a column...
- Not posting much today. But here's an interesting...
- Heh? A couple of weird search requests. No. 36 i...
- It needs restating. An old Economist article on t...
- Ah, Zimbabwe The EU have now spoken, Mugabe bette...
- A few comments from one of the Lockean commentator...
- Straining for a story The Guardian's take on the ...
- Proof! Someone has read right to the end of this ...
- Feast for the eyes Now, I've got bored with colou...
- Pins, rattlesnakes and prophecy Sometimes foresig...
- Anglospheranoia? I think that this chap may be tr...
- He's still free It's four months since September ...
- Correction I said that we weren't sending a singl...
- Harare, Surrey A posting in Samizdata has brought...
- Battle is about to be joined. The Danes have call...
- Locke Step In the entry below there is an interes...
- One in the eye for common sense. We're sending a ...
- Anathema pronounced I have been asked to put thes...
- Proof we've won in Afghanistan 1) Tony Blair cou...
- The joys of heresy. A certain chap called Tom Rob...
- Blair says that the war will not end until Bin Lad...
- A powerful attack on the bankruptcy of the left wi...
- Blair's Pratfall From Blair's speech to the Confe...
- What is the world coming to Mark Steyn is getting...
-
▼
January
(134)
0 comments:
Post a Comment