Wednesday, March 12, 2003
10:38 pm
Giscard is showing his hand - 12th March 2003, 22.35
The Convention remains the centre of debate on the European Constitution. However, Giscard D'Estaing, in his role as president, has short-circuited debate on institutional issues and has demonstrated support for a permanent president of the European Council. In various guises (the single or dual models), this has been supported by the larger countries, Sweden and Denmark.
Kirsty Hughes of the Centre for European Studies has monitored these developments. The meetings between the leaders of the larger countries have been a source of intergovernmental action designed to bypass the Convention and present it with a fait accompli as far as the new institutional arrangements are concerned.
This is also a pre-emption of the Convention. Having established the Convention to debate these issues and find solutions, some governments are now trying to obtain an intergovernmental agreement outside the Convention - which government representatives would then bring within the Convention. Not so much the IGC happening within the Convention but the IGC happening in parallel on the outside.
It is unsurprising to learn that some governments are trying to 'fix' the Convention and ensure that their proposals are the ones adopted at that all important intergovernmental conference. However, the majority of the delegates prefer a rotating presidency or one "single executive presidency for Commission and Council". It is doubtful that such a large area of contention will not prove controversial especially as D'Estaing's impartiality is now in doubt.
Moreover, the Iraqi crisis has proved damaging to the ongoing talks within the European Union and relationships amongst its leadership. I, for one, have been sceptical of those, like Perry de Havilland, who view the current crisis as the beginning of the end for the EU. Such speculations are built out of hope and an expectation that such an illiberal structure cannot last. Nevertheless, one of the immediate consequences has been a scaling down of expectations concerning the common foreign and security policy. Iraq, if it has done nothing else, has postponed any removal of the veto in this area. Another fortunate development is the likelihood that the negotiations on the Constitution may now be delayed because the rift over Iraq may have damaged this endeavour.
Now, however, even Italian diplomats and convention officials acknowledge that the need for tempers to cool after the EU's rift on Iraq means that negotiations are unlikely to begin before October or November. Under such a scenario, it would be impossible to hold a treaty conference this year.ther national officials argue that EU governments' suspicions have heightened, both of one another and of the convention's ruling 13- member praesidium, increasing the probability that extended negotiations could unpick the text presented by Mr Giscard d'Estaing. The 10 countries scheduled to join the EU in May 2004 would also prefer the agreement to be deferred until after they become members, not least since many of them were criticised by France's President Jacques Chirac for their pro-US stance on Iraq.
It is too early to assess what the consequences of the Iraqi rift will have on European integration and there are certainly indications that the process may have been ringfenced from this crisis. On the other hand, there are more reports of delays, though the flood of amendments that the Convention received suggests that interested parties have woken up to the importance of this enterprise and that the workload itself is proving too great for the set timetable. These delays may be blamed on the Iraqi crisis as a suitable scapegoat.
The Convention remains the centre of debate on the European Constitution. However, Giscard D'Estaing, in his role as president, has short-circuited debate on institutional issues and has demonstrated support for a permanent president of the European Council. In various guises (the single or dual models), this has been supported by the larger countries, Sweden and Denmark.
Kirsty Hughes of the Centre for European Studies has monitored these developments. The meetings between the leaders of the larger countries have been a source of intergovernmental action designed to bypass the Convention and present it with a fait accompli as far as the new institutional arrangements are concerned.
This is also a pre-emption of the Convention. Having established the Convention to debate these issues and find solutions, some governments are now trying to obtain an intergovernmental agreement outside the Convention - which government representatives would then bring within the Convention. Not so much the IGC happening within the Convention but the IGC happening in parallel on the outside.
It is unsurprising to learn that some governments are trying to 'fix' the Convention and ensure that their proposals are the ones adopted at that all important intergovernmental conference. However, the majority of the delegates prefer a rotating presidency or one "single executive presidency for Commission and Council". It is doubtful that such a large area of contention will not prove controversial especially as D'Estaing's impartiality is now in doubt.
Moreover, the Iraqi crisis has proved damaging to the ongoing talks within the European Union and relationships amongst its leadership. I, for one, have been sceptical of those, like Perry de Havilland, who view the current crisis as the beginning of the end for the EU. Such speculations are built out of hope and an expectation that such an illiberal structure cannot last. Nevertheless, one of the immediate consequences has been a scaling down of expectations concerning the common foreign and security policy. Iraq, if it has done nothing else, has postponed any removal of the veto in this area. Another fortunate development is the likelihood that the negotiations on the Constitution may now be delayed because the rift over Iraq may have damaged this endeavour.
Now, however, even Italian diplomats and convention officials acknowledge that the need for tempers to cool after the EU's rift on Iraq means that negotiations are unlikely to begin before October or November. Under such a scenario, it would be impossible to hold a treaty conference this year.ther national officials argue that EU governments' suspicions have heightened, both of one another and of the convention's ruling 13- member praesidium, increasing the probability that extended negotiations could unpick the text presented by Mr Giscard d'Estaing. The 10 countries scheduled to join the EU in May 2004 would also prefer the agreement to be deferred until after they become members, not least since many of them were criticised by France's President Jacques Chirac for their pro-US stance on Iraq.
It is too early to assess what the consequences of the Iraqi rift will have on European integration and there are certainly indications that the process may have been ringfenced from this crisis. On the other hand, there are more reports of delays, though the flood of amendments that the Convention received suggests that interested parties have woken up to the importance of this enterprise and that the workload itself is proving too great for the set timetable. These delays may be blamed on the Iraqi crisis as a suitable scapegoat.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
March
(120)
- Understanding Blair - 31st March 2003, 23.15 Many...
- Alexander's Heirs - 31st March 2003, 22.55 Lord R...
- The 'War on Terror' loses its Allies - 31st March ...
- Some Insults - 31st March 2003, 21.57 National Re...
- Zimwatch: Final Days? Personally I don't think th...
- Good thing it was Last Year's War As you have fou...
- America and the World - 30th March 2003, 21.45 Th...
- But is he entirely sane? Matthew Parris asks whet...
- Zimwatch: Now it's for keeps Looks like we're ap...
- Unsustainable Current British troop levels in Bag...
- Robin Red Top Robin Cook writes in the Sunday Mir...
- Win it while we're in it An excellent article by ...
- City Limits Simon Jenkins writes on whether or no...
- Sour Krauts The war is proving unpopular in Germa...
- Rallying round the flag Steve Sailer writes an in...
- Regime Change - 28th March 2003, 0.30 This was no...
- Those who wish or predict defeat - 27th March 2003...
- The Price of Oil and the National Interest The Mo...
- Outsourcing the British Body Count I am now outso...
- Killing Ground Iraqi exile Burhan al-Chalabi writ...
- British Body Count 25/3 2 - Tank crew caught in ...
- It Takes One to Know One - 25th March 2003, 22.08 ...
- Howelling - 25th March 2003, Lord Howell writes ...
- Oh No, Not Again - 25th March 2003, 21.27 One wou...
- Where are the cheering crowds? So the crowds are...
- In case you forgot Meanwhile in last year's war: ...
- Odds Behaviour A $100 payout if Saddam no longer ...
- Silly Thought Has anyone noticed that the first t...
- Zimwatch: over here Strange happenings in Southen...
- Body Count Update 24/3 1 British soldier killed...
- The Interlocking Wheels of Diplomacy and War - 25t...
- Missile Defence: Upgrading of Thule - 25th March 2...
- Slovenia: Confirmed Results - 25th March 2003, 20....
- Dum Frum David Frum beats the Anglospheric drum. ...
- Casualties - 24rd March 2003, 20.35 I have tended...
- Political responses to the Convention - 23rd March...
- Slovenia votes yes - 23rd March 2003, 19.54 Exit ...
- A Snippet There seems to be a fleet street rumour...
- British Body Count As one of the main objections ...
- European Constitution: Internal Security - 23rd Ma...
- Zimwatch: Endgame? Is Mugabe's rule coming to an ...
- A Marriage made in Hell - 22nd March 2003, 20.50 ...
- Levantine Musings The always thought provoking Ge...
- Unlike the Roman Someone has put something in Sea...
- Consequences of the Franco-British rift - 21st Mar...
- That coalition Here's the coalition of the willin...
- A cool handshake - 21st March 2003, 7.13 It's wha...
- Reverse Engineering - 21st March 2003, 7.08 Punis...
- Unintended Consequence It seems that Jack Straw h...
- No great rift quite yet David Carr makes an argum...
- Military Objectives - 20th March 2003, 18.35 The ...
- UNtimely Obituary - 20th March 2003, 18.33 It is ...
- A column I've put out one of my more batty theori...
- Who would be so clumsy? - 19th March 2003, 23.35 ...
- The French for Democracy Flawed democracies are e...
- For everything else, there's France - 19th March 2...
- Tory Rebellion Latest So who are the new Tory reb...
- Zimwatch: Signs of Movement - 18th March 2003, 22....
- Go Davies Go With all the talk of Blair going bec...
- You're either with us, or... A belated happy St P...
- Emigration - 18th March 2003, 20.42 I was attendi...
- Don't expect any help from the American Left - 17t...
- A New Labour Manifesto - 17th March 2003, 20.26 B...
- Salisbury Review Article on Transnational Progress...
- Slovenia - 16th March 2003, 22.45 My first look a...
- Two Birds, One Stone Like chimps typing Hamlet, S...
- The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin - 16th March ...
- And what about NORAID? Useful Bush quote: Well, ...
- Before you leap... The most frustrating thing abo...
- War and Britain's role in the European Convention ...
- It doesn't just affect us - 15th March 2003, 20.18...
- Turkish Delight Colby Cosh has a little piece on ...
- Condemned to repeat Gary North suggests that the ...
- How Le Monde sees it: solidarity - 14th March 2003...
- Entente Cordiale? - 13th March 2003, 22.50 How wi...
- Coming Round Conservative Observer has an interes...
- And who's land is this? Armed US troops stormed t...
- Analysis - 12th March 2003, 23.13 Here is the lin...
- Brown's Euro Claptrap - 12th March 2003, 22.48 Wh...
- Giscard is showing his hand - 12th March 2003, 22....
- Short's Measure British Spin asks why Clare Short...
- Who is John Randall? - 11th March 2003, 22.38 Joh...
- Guess what was inaugurated today? - 11th March 200...
- Paper Laws Bad joke of the day (nine year olds an...
- Damage - 10th March 2003, 23.07 On Airstrip One, ...
- Reading from a different hymn book - 10th March 20...
- Stuff Impartiality! - 9th March 2003, 20.40 One o...
- Peter Hain's Publicity Offensive - 9th March 2003,...
- An Affirmation - 9th March 2003, 20.03 Malta has ...
- Manful Doubts Junius shows doubts about the peace...
- Two slipstreams After savaging Perry de Haviland,...
- Mind the Grass A bit of a blip on the hit counter...
- British Spin is back British Spin has some trench...
- You Heard it here first I've had it hinted from t...
- Samismear I always judge the effectiveness of a p...
- News from the Convention - 7th March 2003, 21.14 ...
- An Unfavourable Comparison - 7th March 2003, 20.56...
- Diary Dates - 7th March 2003, 20.37 On the eve of...
- What a man Mises.org puts in an appreciation of R...
- Status Quo Helen Szamuely (is she George Szamuely...
-
▼
March
(120)
0 comments:
Post a Comment