Thursday, January 16, 2003
8:56 pm
The Battle for Europe is lost. The Battle for Britain has begun - 16th January 2003, 20.56
France and Germany finally revealed their compromise deal for the future governance of the EU and introduced the notion of the Dual Presidency to rank alongside that other famous constitutional cuckoo, the Dual Monarchy. Let's hope that, if it is implemented, it does not last the fifty-one years that Austria and Hungary managed to stay together.
The proposal was unveiled against a backdrop of increasing indifference from the nation-states to the desires and goals of the Commission as they struggle with economic stagnation. The International Herald Tribune examined the latest report of the Commission on member states and disclosed that most countries did not get good marks. For the first time since 1992, and in a black mark against the integration of Euroland, the report stated that cross-border investment and trade had declined as a proportion of the size of the total European economy. Productivity of European workers had also dropped to 83% of their American competitors. The Commission concluded that deficit spending could worsen Europe's forthcoming demographic crisis and might prevent the EU from becoming the most competitive economy in the world by 2010.
These figures show that the European economy is becoming less competitive and the EU does not have the capacity to foster structural reform. Even the promised integration from the creation of Euroland has faltered. The Commission responded to the recalcitrant nations by taking more cases to the European Court of Justice, including the priority 'infringement proceedings against five countries for failing to implement an EU directive ‘‘setting out the minimum standards for the protection of laying hens.’’'
The Franco-German proposal represented a poorly-organised compromise between the intergovernmental and the federal approaches. The former wanted a President based on the Council of Ministers; the latter, a President based on the European Commission. Their solution: we'll have both.
Chirac explained the compromise to journalists last night: "In this spirit (of cooperation), France accepted that the president of the commission be elected by the European Parliament, and Germany accepted that the European Council (Council of Ministers) is chaired by a president elected by the European Council with a qualified majority for a duration of 2 1/2 years or five years."
This proposal will be submitted to the Convention and will probably form the basis of any new institutional arrangements. This dual executive is an awkward compromise that will prevent any reform from touching the EU for years. As the Council of Ministers will be unwilling to elect a president that outshines them, the President of the Commission, now legitimately elected by the European Parliament will gain the position of primus inter pares by default.
Blair has lost the battle in the Convention even before it begun. Expect a rearguard action whilst he attempts to keep the redcoats active on tax, foreign policy and the army. Now is the time to call for a referendum.
France and Germany finally revealed their compromise deal for the future governance of the EU and introduced the notion of the Dual Presidency to rank alongside that other famous constitutional cuckoo, the Dual Monarchy. Let's hope that, if it is implemented, it does not last the fifty-one years that Austria and Hungary managed to stay together.
The proposal was unveiled against a backdrop of increasing indifference from the nation-states to the desires and goals of the Commission as they struggle with economic stagnation. The International Herald Tribune examined the latest report of the Commission on member states and disclosed that most countries did not get good marks. For the first time since 1992, and in a black mark against the integration of Euroland, the report stated that cross-border investment and trade had declined as a proportion of the size of the total European economy. Productivity of European workers had also dropped to 83% of their American competitors. The Commission concluded that deficit spending could worsen Europe's forthcoming demographic crisis and might prevent the EU from becoming the most competitive economy in the world by 2010.
These figures show that the European economy is becoming less competitive and the EU does not have the capacity to foster structural reform. Even the promised integration from the creation of Euroland has faltered. The Commission responded to the recalcitrant nations by taking more cases to the European Court of Justice, including the priority 'infringement proceedings against five countries for failing to implement an EU directive ‘‘setting out the minimum standards for the protection of laying hens.’’'
The Franco-German proposal represented a poorly-organised compromise between the intergovernmental and the federal approaches. The former wanted a President based on the Council of Ministers; the latter, a President based on the European Commission. Their solution: we'll have both.
Chirac explained the compromise to journalists last night: "In this spirit (of cooperation), France accepted that the president of the commission be elected by the European Parliament, and Germany accepted that the European Council (Council of Ministers) is chaired by a president elected by the European Council with a qualified majority for a duration of 2 1/2 years or five years."
This proposal will be submitted to the Convention and will probably form the basis of any new institutional arrangements. This dual executive is an awkward compromise that will prevent any reform from touching the EU for years. As the Council of Ministers will be unwilling to elect a president that outshines them, the President of the Commission, now legitimately elected by the European Parliament will gain the position of primus inter pares by default.
Blair has lost the battle in the Convention even before it begun. Expect a rearguard action whilst he attempts to keep the redcoats active on tax, foreign policy and the army. Now is the time to call for a referendum.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
January
(87)
- Wouldn't that be something? - 30th January 2003, 2...
- New Labour, New Europe - 30th January 2003, 23.06 ...
- Blair's Appeasement - 29th January 2003, 23.15 Bl...
- Winstone's Czech Mate Interesting article in the ...
- The most special of relationships Geoffrey Wheatc...
- France and Britain are to blame - 28th January 200...
- Linkages - 28th January 2003, 20.55 Behind the sc...
- Benefits of Iraq So, we're sending troops to Iraq...
- Two Fronts According to the BBC fighting has erup...
- Defence Merger - 27th January 2003, 23.14 British...
- 1,192 Possible Terrorists to be caught - 26th Janu...
- Start, Act, Ignore (the Independent) - 26th Januar...
- Back of the Net - 26th January 2003, 17.34 A ha! ...
- Exit Strategy - 26th January 2003, 15.54 Sometime...
- Zimwatch: An Idiot writes - 24th January 2003, 00....
- The Heir of Gladstone and Thatcher - 24th January ...
- 'Winable' According to the Foreign Policy Center ...
- More joys of Europe Five Moroccans found with exp...
- Are the Frogs hopping mad? The French seem to be ...
- If you believe that Shock, horror. Saddam has ch...
- The Argument Changes Again. 24th January 2003. A...
- Is Anti-Americanism in Britain increasing in stren...
- Why are they laughing at me? - 23rd January 2003, ...
- That word, opposition I don't like using the word...
- Hitting the Buffers - 22nd January 2003, 23.21 Th...
- Zim watch: Games people play Electric Review has ...
- Crikey The game really must be up for the Euro. ...
- Iraq, what do we do after we go in? Alexander Coc...
- Philip Gould is burying his head in his hands - 21...
- Philosopher Kings As judges are using internation...
- Objectively Evil I couldn't make this up: The Eu...
- Let Slip... - 20th January 2003, 23.28 Geoff Hoon...
- The Dual Executive is strengthened - 20th January ...
- Further Strength to the Referendum Camp - 20th Jan...
- For Rothermere and Liberty It's been a while sinc...
- Confused and Insecure - 19th January 2003, 21.20 ...
- Beyond the Pole - 17th January 2003, 23.18 Geoff ...
- What's it good for? A good bit of right wing NATO...
- Wrestling with Islam An interesting essay on the ...
- Just War An interesting article on Just War by Mu...
- Not one of our better campaigns - 16th January 200...
- The Battle for Europe is lost. The Battle for Brit...
- W, WWYD? The question "well what would you do?" h...
- Peace of what? A new group seems to be organising...
- Sacked for Blogging Iain Murray has been sacked f...
- 'Britain's role is to unite the world' It's some ...
- Jail for Jokes It's really quite chilling how ben...
- Securing Energy Supplies - 14th January 2003, 23.0...
- More public consultation In an article on the fam...
- Liberalism and the EU redux I'm not sure whether ...
- Identity Problem Do you like the idea of identity...
- Zimwatch: False Dawn? - 13th January 2003, 23.00 ...
- Heralding an Inner Core - 13th January 2003, 20.56...
- Murdoch sells out One of the problems about the A...
- By Jingo what a fuss There is a bit of a to do ar...
- Zimwatch: From Crisis to Catastrophe, From Fear to...
- Italy: Eurocon Referendum - 12th January 2003, 13....
- Brunei: British Gurkhas stay on - 12th January 200...
- Unreported in the UK Media - 12th January 2003, 13...
- Preachers of Hate - 11th January 2003, 21.00 Angu...
- Liberation is a Reactionary Word - 11th January 20...
- Zimwatch: Slow Steps to Genocide - 10th January 20...
- How to do it I remember the peace movement in Ame...
- A real threat While busy bleating about the drast...
- Vulnerability to the Economic Costs of an Aging Po...
- Christianity's Clause in the Eurocon - 9th January...
- American Views of the Palestinian Conference - 9th...
- Not so magic circle The Telegraph reports on plan...
- If you can't win the argument, smear I used to li...
- Cato's take on Prodi's Plan for the EU - 8th Janua...
- Tories keep Eurocon simmering- 7th January 2003, 2...
- NAFTA or EU? - 8th January 2003, 21.05 Talk of cl...
- Don't Blame Religion Javier Solana is profiled in...
- Would you trust your money with them? France and ...
- Zimwatch: Mad Bad Bob - 7th January 2003, 20.15 I...
- I am a Counsellor to an American Prince - 7th Janu...
- Our Foreign Policy in action - 6th January 2003, 2...
- Identification: Friendly Fire - 6th January 2002, ...
- Simply not our job At last there is an attempt to...
- Soft Power - 5th January 2003, 23.58 Walker's Wor...
- American Recessional - 5th January 2003, 23.35 Pa...
- The 30 year rule - 4th January 2003, 8.55 Many do...
- Still at the Heart of Europe - 4th January 2003, 1...
- How is the Swedish model faring? - 3rd January 200...
- Lost Letter This letter does not appear to be on ...
- Importing the problem Srdja Trifkovic writes abou...
- On the other side of the world Some of the more r...
-
▼
January
(87)
0 comments:
Post a Comment