Saturday, July 05, 2003
11:33 am
Warmed up Leftovers - 5th July 2003, 11.27
David Ignatius, formerly executive editor of the International Herald Tribune, analyses the tit-for-tat exchanges between the United States and France. These are focussed specifically upon the bilateral treaties that the United States is arranging to guarantee exemption from the International Criminal Court. France is using its diplomatic clout to warn those countries that sign of the possible consequences.
When Romania agreed to US requests for a waiver, for example, France reportedly reacted by warning the Romanians that they could be jeopardizing future membership in the European Union. The French are said to have issued a similar warning to at least one Baltic state that hopes to join the EU.
US diplomats claim the French also backtracked on their pledge to exempt from ICC prosecution US troops that are involved in UN peacekeeping missions. The French had signaled they would support an automatic rollover of this exemption when it was drafted last year. But when it came up for renewal in the Security Council last month, France abstained.
The French have already obtained an exemption for themselves:
What’s particularly galling, say US officials, is that the French negotiated for themselves a seven-year waiver from prosecution by the ICC which a French friend tells me makes them the only country with such blanket immunity.
After all, France signed the treaty for the ICC on the July 18th 1998 and ratified the ICC on the 9th June 2000, with a small proviso:
At the time of ratification, France made a reservation on Article 124 of the Rome Statute, which excludes prosecutions of French citizens for war crimes from the ICC’s juridiction for seven years.
The United Kingdom signed up hook, line and sinker under our present incompetent masters.
It is no surprise that the French gave themselves seven years to examine whether the ICC would prove a successful venture. If it proved to be a viper that encroached too heavily on French foreign policy, they would withdraw without any further thought. Would that Britain were so naked and analytical in its national interest.
David Ignatius, formerly executive editor of the International Herald Tribune, analyses the tit-for-tat exchanges between the United States and France. These are focussed specifically upon the bilateral treaties that the United States is arranging to guarantee exemption from the International Criminal Court. France is using its diplomatic clout to warn those countries that sign of the possible consequences.
When Romania agreed to US requests for a waiver, for example, France reportedly reacted by warning the Romanians that they could be jeopardizing future membership in the European Union. The French are said to have issued a similar warning to at least one Baltic state that hopes to join the EU.
US diplomats claim the French also backtracked on their pledge to exempt from ICC prosecution US troops that are involved in UN peacekeeping missions. The French had signaled they would support an automatic rollover of this exemption when it was drafted last year. But when it came up for renewal in the Security Council last month, France abstained.
The French have already obtained an exemption for themselves:
What’s particularly galling, say US officials, is that the French negotiated for themselves a seven-year waiver from prosecution by the ICC which a French friend tells me makes them the only country with such blanket immunity.
After all, France signed the treaty for the ICC on the July 18th 1998 and ratified the ICC on the 9th June 2000, with a small proviso:
At the time of ratification, France made a reservation on Article 124 of the Rome Statute, which excludes prosecutions of French citizens for war crimes from the ICC’s juridiction for seven years.
The United Kingdom signed up hook, line and sinker under our present incompetent masters.
It is no surprise that the French gave themselves seven years to examine whether the ICC would prove a successful venture. If it proved to be a viper that encroached too heavily on French foreign policy, they would withdraw without any further thought. Would that Britain were so naked and analytical in its national interest.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
July
(66)
- Turning back the Clock - 31st July 2003, 22.56 Th...
- Following Saddam's example Another way in which t...
- How unreasonable is Red Korea? Close your eyes an...
- Why Hutton? - 30th July 2003, 22.50 The name of L...
- Robertson goes bonkers What is George Robertson, ...
- Brits do it better At least according to Salam Pa...
- Carving "4REAL" on their arms - 28th July 2003, 22...
- Euro-sense What the hell, here's another site on ...
- And this is how they did it in Romania This nice ...
- Is the Beeb the main story? The main fight on the...
- Pointing the Finger - 25th July 2003, 12:04 Some ...
- Gilligan's Island Boris Johnson writes in defence...
- The Heart of Europe - 23rd July 2003, 23.54 Once ...
- Why the Yanks should never run an Empire Excuse m...
- Have you seen this man? Poor old Ali Campbell...
- Between the Lines "I did not authorise the leakin...
- Sack Bernard One odd thing in all this Dr Kelly s...
- Too wide for handshakes... - 21st July 2003, 23.05...
- Compare and Contrast "In the meantime, our attitu...
- Cack handed Query I'd be interested to know if an...
- Of Little Note Isn't it funny how they've not fou...
- Hit counter Is there any package out there that c...
- Why don't they love us? The War Nerd writes a goo...
- Courtesy of Steve Sailer: "If the French were our...
- Damaged Goods - 19th July 2003, 23.15 Some are ca...
- Best of British? Samizdata moans that the Guardia...
- Questions on Kelly I am neither a medical man, so...
- Plagiarising the War Powers Act - 18th July 2003, ...
- Nary a Hint... - 18th July 2003, 22.48 Perhaps it...
- Conspiracy Corner It seems that the body is David...
- Out of the Blue Dr David Kelly, the man erroneous...
- Who needs a trial? Toby Studabaker is to be extra...
- Post-Libertarianism This article in Samizdata is ...
- Liberal Liberal Democrats? Lack of consistency m...
- Last year's war, ctd It looks like Pakistan have ...
- The Strong or the Weak? Our friend Christopher Mo...
- Where's Osama And where's Saddam? And what happe...
- So where are our chips? Anne Applebaum says that ...
- Zimwatch: Mugabicle Chairs Just a thought. Does ...
- Roots of the Right This column from George Monbio...
- Under Scrutiny - 13th July 2003, 20.33 Parliament...
- How many reasons do you need? Junior minister Mic...
- Aren't bald men supposed to be evil? - 12th July 2...
- New Links Another pot pouri of new links: Anthro...
- Burying Shaka Gene Expression wonders whether Tha...
- From Baghdad As the man who missed Salman Pax I'm...
- Are they serious? After sniping at the unoriginal...
- Why the Bloggers won't inherit the earth The Spec...
- The Benefits of leaving the EU This was originall...
- The Spanglosphere Yes, beating the Anglosphere is...
- Quitting Time And now an old column from Peter Hi...
- Surprised? According to the Torygraph: Germany a...
- We Object - 8th July 2003, 22.40 On the question ...
- Not in the Clear The government are furiously spi...
- Bae's Future Prospects - 7th July 2003, 23.01 Lik...
- Now we bribe them The Afghan provinces are going ...
- America's Peacekeepers - 6th July 2003, 23.03 Mar...
- Evidence emerges that the British Army was unprepa...
- The real face of the Guardian The Guardian longs ...
- Brer Tory Christopher Booker speculated a month a...
- When the chips are down With the Yanks planning t...
- The Western European Union - 5th July 2003, 14.25 ...
- Warmed up Leftovers - 5th July 2003, 11.27 David ...
- Kraal Watch Troops may still be in danger in Meso...
- Into Africa: Now the Yanks want to join the party ...
- Zimwatch: The Grind - 1st July 2003, 23.21 Zimbab...
-
▼
July
(66)
0 comments:
Post a Comment