Wednesday, July 16, 2003
6:39 pm
Liberal Liberal Democrats?
Lack of consistency must be a lib dem strongpoint. The ability to leap from their nasty statist policies of tax raising and bureaucracy of the last election to a sensible and probably popular policy today. While according to The Sunday Times 1 in 4 probably think that we need more government the rest of us who suffer and support the burden of the state should encourage Charles Kennedy's new idea to prune back central government.
The merging of the Scottish/Welsh office etc is a welcome sign which could lead to greater independence and possibly total separation. Cutting down on other offices might make government more transparent.
Unfortunately Kennedy and his party do not have much of a reputation for being liberal. If this policy survives then although I doubt it will help the lib dems. who would believe them? It could however have the effect of bringing ideas like this topic of discussion into the open. Right wing and libertarian websites are full of explanations of how excess state control costs and injures the poor more than allowing them to deal with their own affairs. But the Tories would never be able to come up with this policy on their own. The left wing clamour and lies would drown out rational argument and they would have to back down discrediting sensible policy in the process. Adopting a policy from a left wing party is very different though. It removes a whole arsenal of statist ammunition.
Lack of consistency must be a lib dem strongpoint. The ability to leap from their nasty statist policies of tax raising and bureaucracy of the last election to a sensible and probably popular policy today. While according to The Sunday Times 1 in 4 probably think that we need more government the rest of us who suffer and support the burden of the state should encourage Charles Kennedy's new idea to prune back central government.
The merging of the Scottish/Welsh office etc is a welcome sign which could lead to greater independence and possibly total separation. Cutting down on other offices might make government more transparent.
Unfortunately Kennedy and his party do not have much of a reputation for being liberal. If this policy survives then although I doubt it will help the lib dems. who would believe them? It could however have the effect of bringing ideas like this topic of discussion into the open. Right wing and libertarian websites are full of explanations of how excess state control costs and injures the poor more than allowing them to deal with their own affairs. But the Tories would never be able to come up with this policy on their own. The left wing clamour and lies would drown out rational argument and they would have to back down discrediting sensible policy in the process. Adopting a policy from a left wing party is very different though. It removes a whole arsenal of statist ammunition.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
July
(66)
- Turning back the Clock - 31st July 2003, 22.56 Th...
- Following Saddam's example Another way in which t...
- How unreasonable is Red Korea? Close your eyes an...
- Why Hutton? - 30th July 2003, 22.50 The name of L...
- Robertson goes bonkers What is George Robertson, ...
- Brits do it better At least according to Salam Pa...
- Carving "4REAL" on their arms - 28th July 2003, 22...
- Euro-sense What the hell, here's another site on ...
- And this is how they did it in Romania This nice ...
- Is the Beeb the main story? The main fight on the...
- Pointing the Finger - 25th July 2003, 12:04 Some ...
- Gilligan's Island Boris Johnson writes in defence...
- The Heart of Europe - 23rd July 2003, 23.54 Once ...
- Why the Yanks should never run an Empire Excuse m...
- Have you seen this man? Poor old Ali Campbell...
- Between the Lines "I did not authorise the leakin...
- Sack Bernard One odd thing in all this Dr Kelly s...
- Too wide for handshakes... - 21st July 2003, 23.05...
- Compare and Contrast "In the meantime, our attitu...
- Cack handed Query I'd be interested to know if an...
- Of Little Note Isn't it funny how they've not fou...
- Hit counter Is there any package out there that c...
- Why don't they love us? The War Nerd writes a goo...
- Courtesy of Steve Sailer: "If the French were our...
- Damaged Goods - 19th July 2003, 23.15 Some are ca...
- Best of British? Samizdata moans that the Guardia...
- Questions on Kelly I am neither a medical man, so...
- Plagiarising the War Powers Act - 18th July 2003, ...
- Nary a Hint... - 18th July 2003, 22.48 Perhaps it...
- Conspiracy Corner It seems that the body is David...
- Out of the Blue Dr David Kelly, the man erroneous...
- Who needs a trial? Toby Studabaker is to be extra...
- Post-Libertarianism This article in Samizdata is ...
- Liberal Liberal Democrats? Lack of consistency m...
- Last year's war, ctd It looks like Pakistan have ...
- The Strong or the Weak? Our friend Christopher Mo...
- Where's Osama And where's Saddam? And what happe...
- So where are our chips? Anne Applebaum says that ...
- Zimwatch: Mugabicle Chairs Just a thought. Does ...
- Roots of the Right This column from George Monbio...
- Under Scrutiny - 13th July 2003, 20.33 Parliament...
- How many reasons do you need? Junior minister Mic...
- Aren't bald men supposed to be evil? - 12th July 2...
- New Links Another pot pouri of new links: Anthro...
- Burying Shaka Gene Expression wonders whether Tha...
- From Baghdad As the man who missed Salman Pax I'm...
- Are they serious? After sniping at the unoriginal...
- Why the Bloggers won't inherit the earth The Spec...
- The Benefits of leaving the EU This was originall...
- The Spanglosphere Yes, beating the Anglosphere is...
- Quitting Time And now an old column from Peter Hi...
- Surprised? According to the Torygraph: Germany a...
- We Object - 8th July 2003, 22.40 On the question ...
- Not in the Clear The government are furiously spi...
- Bae's Future Prospects - 7th July 2003, 23.01 Lik...
- Now we bribe them The Afghan provinces are going ...
- America's Peacekeepers - 6th July 2003, 23.03 Mar...
- Evidence emerges that the British Army was unprepa...
- The real face of the Guardian The Guardian longs ...
- Brer Tory Christopher Booker speculated a month a...
- When the chips are down With the Yanks planning t...
- The Western European Union - 5th July 2003, 14.25 ...
- Warmed up Leftovers - 5th July 2003, 11.27 David ...
- Kraal Watch Troops may still be in danger in Meso...
- Into Africa: Now the Yanks want to join the party ...
- Zimwatch: The Grind - 1st July 2003, 23.21 Zimbab...
-
▼
July
(66)
0 comments:
Post a Comment