Monday, July 21, 2003
11:13 pm
Too wide for handshakes... - 21st July 2003, 23.05
Andrew Pfaff, of the International Herald Tribune, notes that NATO has decided not to send troops to take up peacekeeping duties in Iraq and argues that this is a signal for a breakdown of the Atlanticist alliance. Pfaff moves from this decision to blame all of the consequences of this division on the foreign policy of the Bush administration. The one-sided article views the European actions as a reaction to American unilateralism and ignores the pertinent facts that indicate many European states started pursuing a common obscurity policy in the late 90s as a counterweight to US hegemony.
The Europeans simply no longer agree with the United States. They don't agree about the terrorist threat. They don't think Osama bin Laden is a global menace. They don't take Washington's view of rogue states. They don't agree about pre-emptive war, clash of civilizations, the demonization of Islam, or Pentagon domination of U.S. foreign policy.
The important point within the article lay in the quotation from a former supporter of the United States who had, through the actions of the Bush admnistration, turned towards support of the ESDP and an 'independent' Europe, whilst criticising the actions of the US as 'unilateralist', an old and rather tiresome canard.
Such views are interpreted in the United States as "anti-Americanism." The truth, as a leading (conservative) figure from ex-Communist "New Europe" said at one of these meetings, is that the Bush administration has turned America's friends into anti-Americans.
He said that throughout his political life he had been an admirer and defender of the United States against left-wing European critics, but now he has become what he calls a "new anti-American."
He defined new anti-Americans as "former anti-anti-Americans, now forced to become anti-American themselves." He said that in his own country, the U.S. ambassador behaves in the way the Soviet Union's ambassador did before 1989. This simply is unacceptable.
For whatever reasons, and this character appears to have taken an American injunction quite personally, Pfaff's article illustrates a trend across both 'Old' and 'New' Europe. The conservatives, who originally supported both an Atlanticist foreign policy and European integration, have now jumped an ideological gap and allied themselves with the French Gaullists. The members of the EU have gradually migrated over the last decade, but are part of the conservative element in Central Europe now lining up behind the Germans? If so, the plan to base US troops in depend upon a gradually diminishing foundation of public support.
Andrew Pfaff, of the International Herald Tribune, notes that NATO has decided not to send troops to take up peacekeeping duties in Iraq and argues that this is a signal for a breakdown of the Atlanticist alliance. Pfaff moves from this decision to blame all of the consequences of this division on the foreign policy of the Bush administration. The one-sided article views the European actions as a reaction to American unilateralism and ignores the pertinent facts that indicate many European states started pursuing a common obscurity policy in the late 90s as a counterweight to US hegemony.
The Europeans simply no longer agree with the United States. They don't agree about the terrorist threat. They don't think Osama bin Laden is a global menace. They don't take Washington's view of rogue states. They don't agree about pre-emptive war, clash of civilizations, the demonization of Islam, or Pentagon domination of U.S. foreign policy.
The important point within the article lay in the quotation from a former supporter of the United States who had, through the actions of the Bush admnistration, turned towards support of the ESDP and an 'independent' Europe, whilst criticising the actions of the US as 'unilateralist', an old and rather tiresome canard.
Such views are interpreted in the United States as "anti-Americanism." The truth, as a leading (conservative) figure from ex-Communist "New Europe" said at one of these meetings, is that the Bush administration has turned America's friends into anti-Americans.
He said that throughout his political life he had been an admirer and defender of the United States against left-wing European critics, but now he has become what he calls a "new anti-American."
He defined new anti-Americans as "former anti-anti-Americans, now forced to become anti-American themselves." He said that in his own country, the U.S. ambassador behaves in the way the Soviet Union's ambassador did before 1989. This simply is unacceptable.
For whatever reasons, and this character appears to have taken an American injunction quite personally, Pfaff's article illustrates a trend across both 'Old' and 'New' Europe. The conservatives, who originally supported both an Atlanticist foreign policy and European integration, have now jumped an ideological gap and allied themselves with the French Gaullists. The members of the EU have gradually migrated over the last decade, but are part of the conservative element in Central Europe now lining up behind the Germans? If so, the plan to base US troops in depend upon a gradually diminishing foundation of public support.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
July
(66)
- Turning back the Clock - 31st July 2003, 22.56 Th...
- Following Saddam's example Another way in which t...
- How unreasonable is Red Korea? Close your eyes an...
- Why Hutton? - 30th July 2003, 22.50 The name of L...
- Robertson goes bonkers What is George Robertson, ...
- Brits do it better At least according to Salam Pa...
- Carving "4REAL" on their arms - 28th July 2003, 22...
- Euro-sense What the hell, here's another site on ...
- And this is how they did it in Romania This nice ...
- Is the Beeb the main story? The main fight on the...
- Pointing the Finger - 25th July 2003, 12:04 Some ...
- Gilligan's Island Boris Johnson writes in defence...
- The Heart of Europe - 23rd July 2003, 23.54 Once ...
- Why the Yanks should never run an Empire Excuse m...
- Have you seen this man? Poor old Ali Campbell...
- Between the Lines "I did not authorise the leakin...
- Sack Bernard One odd thing in all this Dr Kelly s...
- Too wide for handshakes... - 21st July 2003, 23.05...
- Compare and Contrast "In the meantime, our attitu...
- Cack handed Query I'd be interested to know if an...
- Of Little Note Isn't it funny how they've not fou...
- Hit counter Is there any package out there that c...
- Why don't they love us? The War Nerd writes a goo...
- Courtesy of Steve Sailer: "If the French were our...
- Damaged Goods - 19th July 2003, 23.15 Some are ca...
- Best of British? Samizdata moans that the Guardia...
- Questions on Kelly I am neither a medical man, so...
- Plagiarising the War Powers Act - 18th July 2003, ...
- Nary a Hint... - 18th July 2003, 22.48 Perhaps it...
- Conspiracy Corner It seems that the body is David...
- Out of the Blue Dr David Kelly, the man erroneous...
- Who needs a trial? Toby Studabaker is to be extra...
- Post-Libertarianism This article in Samizdata is ...
- Liberal Liberal Democrats? Lack of consistency m...
- Last year's war, ctd It looks like Pakistan have ...
- The Strong or the Weak? Our friend Christopher Mo...
- Where's Osama And where's Saddam? And what happe...
- So where are our chips? Anne Applebaum says that ...
- Zimwatch: Mugabicle Chairs Just a thought. Does ...
- Roots of the Right This column from George Monbio...
- Under Scrutiny - 13th July 2003, 20.33 Parliament...
- How many reasons do you need? Junior minister Mic...
- Aren't bald men supposed to be evil? - 12th July 2...
- New Links Another pot pouri of new links: Anthro...
- Burying Shaka Gene Expression wonders whether Tha...
- From Baghdad As the man who missed Salman Pax I'm...
- Are they serious? After sniping at the unoriginal...
- Why the Bloggers won't inherit the earth The Spec...
- The Benefits of leaving the EU This was originall...
- The Spanglosphere Yes, beating the Anglosphere is...
- Quitting Time And now an old column from Peter Hi...
- Surprised? According to the Torygraph: Germany a...
- We Object - 8th July 2003, 22.40 On the question ...
- Not in the Clear The government are furiously spi...
- Bae's Future Prospects - 7th July 2003, 23.01 Lik...
- Now we bribe them The Afghan provinces are going ...
- America's Peacekeepers - 6th July 2003, 23.03 Mar...
- Evidence emerges that the British Army was unprepa...
- The real face of the Guardian The Guardian longs ...
- Brer Tory Christopher Booker speculated a month a...
- When the chips are down With the Yanks planning t...
- The Western European Union - 5th July 2003, 14.25 ...
- Warmed up Leftovers - 5th July 2003, 11.27 David ...
- Kraal Watch Troops may still be in danger in Meso...
- Into Africa: Now the Yanks want to join the party ...
- Zimwatch: The Grind - 1st July 2003, 23.21 Zimbab...
-
▼
July
(66)
0 comments:
Post a Comment