Monday, May 20, 2002
2:25 pm
No Downside?
My improvement on antiwar.com, Christopher Montgomery, has come up with another article, this time on immigration. His basic thesis is that immigration is good, has always been good and "has produced no downside whatsoever" (his emphasis).
The idea that a massive social change would produce "no downside whatsoever" is rather curious coming from a High Tory such as Monty. Perhaps this is the first action to defy Newtonian laws, will perpetual motion be next? Not to challenge his basic thesis that immigration is a simply wonderful thing (I may do that later, my views are far more nuanced) there are some downsides that I can think of which may conceivably be laid at the door of the immigration experiment:
1) The depression of low skilled wages in comparison to Japan or America (until the 1970s). What's wrong with low skilled workers actually earning more? Downside 1.
2) Crime. The inbalance in crime figures among ethnic groups is the sort of unofficial secret that our liberal dinner tables specialise in. And why would this be odd? After all if the sorts of people who migrate (full of initiative, ambitious and more intelligent than their brothers and sisters) are just the sort of people who start up small businesses - are they not the same profile that will get involved in, oh, organised crime? Of course crime would have gone up anyway since the 1940s, but I think it is fair to say that as (a) crime has gone up and (b) immigrants and their descendants provide criminals out of proportion to their proportion in the general population - then some of the increase in crime is down to immigration. Downside number 2.
3) Why have we been getting all these Muslim terrorists all of a sudden? Is there a mass conversion to Islam in the shires? At a lower, and thankfully less lethal, level the children and grandchildren of immigrants are less likely to identify with their new home, just look at the bumper stickers - Jamaican flags are not the sign of assimilation. Part of the answer is undoubtedly to educate the children in English history and provide a civic virtue to subscribe to. However this is still a downside of immigration.
This is not to say that immigration is wrong, just that it has negative effects. Immigration certainly has many good effects, but let's not pretend that there are no downsides.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
May
(96)
- Let’s blame Brussels – for a change Both Natalie ...
- Daddy Peaceblogs? Is Steve Chapman going soft? T...
- Blame Europe for everything brigade Who can Tom b...
- Invade France Paul Gottfried is not writing about...
- 91/440 or bust. Or both. Natalie Solent (who thi...
- Oiling the future Jeremy Sapienza points out a st...
- Another day, another deployment Tony Blair told u...
- Minister for whose Transport? Iain Gray is a fair...
- Penny for the Byers So why did Liar Byers hit the...
- Please Lord, don't make us Swiss Some response fr...
- Search me You can now go and look through my arch...
- It begins with a K So there's this territory and ...
- Pro Europeans and child murderers European Court ...
- Shades of Gray John Gray has a stab at analysing ...
- Another reason to get our troops out They've appo...
- Burning Bush For those of us who have this rosy v...
- Happy Monday My improvement at antiwar.com has co...
- Just Leave UN rebukes Britain over smacking.
- New Blog Alert I would like to point you to this ...
- And we still wait After all this waiting the firs...
- Forgotten Corner Looks like our troops will have ...
- Cheery news A minimum of three million people wou...
- The folly of arms control At the risk of dictatin...
- No Free Speech, we're Europeans This should send ...
- So why did they do it? Two takes on the Sinn Fein...
- New Toy The Google news search, may not be perfec...
- Victory over the French Who said that Le Pen was ...
- Intervention and Kashmir Surely you can't keep ou...
- Kashmir source If you want to follow Kashmir, you...
- The Hague Farce Let's ignore India, Pakistan, Kas...
- Different strokes Once again I must thank Iain Mu...
- Page not found If this is happening to your web l...
- Incidentally... Iain Murray puts me straight on m...
- Jump or Push? First they defend him, then they sa...
- Fisked Here's an article that will appear on a nu...
- Searching for meaning over the sea This Irish ele...
- Referendum Postponed? Do you really think that th...
- Gold News I'm puzzled. Nothing new there. Iain ...
- No Downside? My improvement on antiwar.com, Chris...
- Spot the Trot Gosh, a whole BBC online piece on A...
- Through the Mill Knowing how you all seem to dete...
- State Failure This reasonably fair minded assesme...
- Where's Osama? And if he's dead, where's his body?
- So that's why Oswald liked the idea I get wary wh...
- Sense in strange places Someone else notices the ...
- Allies do spy on each other Israeli arts students...
- Thank God for Instapundit Last time I did this I ...
- Convenient Fiction Is the Economist really a free...
- What will unite us? In the Spectator Chris Patten...
- Whose guns were they? So those guns, were they Al...
- Token? Was I the only one who heard, Joao Valera,...
- The Great Dictator "I'm not keen on Emmanuel Gold...
- Only 40 000? Two interesting reports on the (by B...
- News from the High Tory Uplands My improvement at...
- Fair's fair Fred Pruit at Rantburg has told us wh...
- What's your opinion on Liberia? Don't have one? ...
- Where Bias can lead This web log doesn't cover th...
- Who is Pim? An interesting and balanced attempt t...
- Foreign or Domestic? Here's an interesting articl...
- Back to Kosovo Do you remember Tony Blair accusin...
- Another one emerges Sixth Briton held at Camp X-R...
- Cosying up to the commies An interesting, if old ...
- Did I read that right? From an old article by Mar...
- Are you ready for Neo-Imperialism? A thoughtful, ...
- Nope, won't find it here< MSN Search puts me at n...
- Still a menace There's a lot of complacency about...
- On massacres The treatment of the Palestinians an...
- Is Arafat finished? Robert Fisk seems to think so.
- Paper of Record? Pah Michael Gove has written a ...
- Was Fortuyn a fascist? Here is the Manifesto of L...
- Out of mind, out of luck ‘High risk of Indo-Pak w...
- Pot and Kettle Mark Steel says that Pim Fortuyn w...
- The future's tide Bill Deedes has a thoughtful ar...
- Immigration and Israel This article about anti-se...
- The Indian Example Name one group of countries th...
- Quote for the week The ultimate purpose of our fo...
- Are they related? There's a disturbing link. Bot...
- In defence of Bribery The Economist has an articl...
- The EU to use Rainbow flag Young man, there's no ...
- Assassins of Liberty Justin Raimondo has a good p...
- Book Alert Ernest Bevin's biography is out from P...
- Loony Tunes The Economist really can pick stupid ...
- Brave Prediction According to this writer in the ...
- Who counts the votes? An old article on election ...
- Democracy? What Democracy From the BBC: In Brus...
- Dreadfully rude I do follow Football, but I am no...
- Random thoughts on Fortuyn There'll be more in de...
- Time to follow the American lead US renounces cou...
- Where's Osama? Oh dear. Me and my big mouth.
- Security begins at home A rather disturbing artic...
- Dutch far-right leader 'shot dead'. And all he wa...
- The we're all right club David Carr says he "hear...
- If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it Tha...
- The Corndog For any NRO Corner fans out there (bo...
- Terrifyingly naive Sacre Bleue. Hugo Young write...
- Conservatives for an Independent Britain - a propo...
-
▼
May
(96)
0 comments:
Post a Comment