Sunday, May 05, 2002
9:24 pm
If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it
That was the title of Ken Livingstone's autobiography before he became London Mayor. He thought he was making a clever-clever point, but it seems that he may have been on to something. In Bradford and Birmingham they are thinking of shelving plans for directly elected mayors because they may offer the British National Party a "platform", and in the Independent there are reports that the government will sue any BNP councillors who vote on racially charged issues. Excuse me, weren't the deluded burghers of Burnley voting for them to be racially charged?
The point is that you won't beat the far right by closing down votes or denying them a "platform". It totally ignores the reasons for their success.
A few years ago I found myself involved in a council housing case in an inner city area. A young, working, married couple had been living with the wives parents for eight years and the council were effectively refusing to find them a place. The wife and (I think) her parents had been born in the council's area and the overcrowding was affecting the father's health.
The next door two bed flat had been empty for some months, and was suddenly extensively repaired by a council work crew. To house the couple? No. To house a single Nigerian woman new to the country, who was paying her rent through social security payments rather than her wages.
Now to the great credit of the dwellers of this overcrowded flat no connection was made between the nationality of the next door neighbour and their plight, perhaps they'd thought that I'd be offended. However the general grumbles about favouring immigrants were never far from the surface.
This is one reason why the BNP have so much potential for growth. The perception is that immigrant communities are crowding out not just the jobs of the native working class (which also includes British-born blacks and Asians) but the homes and schools as well. It also shows a second reason for the growth of the BNP, but not so obvious. The working class may have DVD recorders and satelite TV, put it is still at the mercy of middle class bureaucrats when it comes to policing, housing and their children's education. Not only are many of their most basic necesities out of their hands, but the people who control these necesities despise them.
The working class are beginning feel that there is no one there to protect them. And they're right. Their old protectors in the Labour Party have become the political arm of white collar Public service workers - who are more of the working class's class enemy than the bosses ever were. The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats are less institutionally biased against the working class than the Labour Party, but simply have spent too long in the Shires and the free market or civil liberty think tanks to learn how to address the Working Class. And as for the majority of the far left they are simply from the same constituency as the Labour Party, more concerned with teachers' perks than with ensuring a good education for working class kids.
So who's there to represent the working class? The far right have seen their niche, and they're going for it. It is for this reason, and not because of virulent white racism, that the BNP has been starting to find success.
Of course the Left's reaction will be to call for the far right to be no platformed and in private to decry the lack of revolutionary fiber in the working class. But in the end the BNP's their bastard offspring.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
May
(96)
- Let’s blame Brussels – for a change Both Natalie ...
- Daddy Peaceblogs? Is Steve Chapman going soft? T...
- Blame Europe for everything brigade Who can Tom b...
- Invade France Paul Gottfried is not writing about...
- 91/440 or bust. Or both. Natalie Solent (who thi...
- Oiling the future Jeremy Sapienza points out a st...
- Another day, another deployment Tony Blair told u...
- Minister for whose Transport? Iain Gray is a fair...
- Penny for the Byers So why did Liar Byers hit the...
- Please Lord, don't make us Swiss Some response fr...
- Search me You can now go and look through my arch...
- It begins with a K So there's this territory and ...
- Pro Europeans and child murderers European Court ...
- Shades of Gray John Gray has a stab at analysing ...
- Another reason to get our troops out They've appo...
- Burning Bush For those of us who have this rosy v...
- Happy Monday My improvement at antiwar.com has co...
- Just Leave UN rebukes Britain over smacking.
- New Blog Alert I would like to point you to this ...
- And we still wait After all this waiting the firs...
- Forgotten Corner Looks like our troops will have ...
- Cheery news A minimum of three million people wou...
- The folly of arms control At the risk of dictatin...
- No Free Speech, we're Europeans This should send ...
- So why did they do it? Two takes on the Sinn Fein...
- New Toy The Google news search, may not be perfec...
- Victory over the French Who said that Le Pen was ...
- Intervention and Kashmir Surely you can't keep ou...
- Kashmir source If you want to follow Kashmir, you...
- The Hague Farce Let's ignore India, Pakistan, Kas...
- Different strokes Once again I must thank Iain Mu...
- Page not found If this is happening to your web l...
- Incidentally... Iain Murray puts me straight on m...
- Jump or Push? First they defend him, then they sa...
- Fisked Here's an article that will appear on a nu...
- Searching for meaning over the sea This Irish ele...
- Referendum Postponed? Do you really think that th...
- Gold News I'm puzzled. Nothing new there. Iain ...
- No Downside? My improvement on antiwar.com, Chris...
- Spot the Trot Gosh, a whole BBC online piece on A...
- Through the Mill Knowing how you all seem to dete...
- State Failure This reasonably fair minded assesme...
- Where's Osama? And if he's dead, where's his body?
- So that's why Oswald liked the idea I get wary wh...
- Sense in strange places Someone else notices the ...
- Allies do spy on each other Israeli arts students...
- Thank God for Instapundit Last time I did this I ...
- Convenient Fiction Is the Economist really a free...
- What will unite us? In the Spectator Chris Patten...
- Whose guns were they? So those guns, were they Al...
- Token? Was I the only one who heard, Joao Valera,...
- The Great Dictator "I'm not keen on Emmanuel Gold...
- Only 40 000? Two interesting reports on the (by B...
- News from the High Tory Uplands My improvement at...
- Fair's fair Fred Pruit at Rantburg has told us wh...
- What's your opinion on Liberia? Don't have one? ...
- Where Bias can lead This web log doesn't cover th...
- Who is Pim? An interesting and balanced attempt t...
- Foreign or Domestic? Here's an interesting articl...
- Back to Kosovo Do you remember Tony Blair accusin...
- Another one emerges Sixth Briton held at Camp X-R...
- Cosying up to the commies An interesting, if old ...
- Did I read that right? From an old article by Mar...
- Are you ready for Neo-Imperialism? A thoughtful, ...
- Nope, won't find it here< MSN Search puts me at n...
- Still a menace There's a lot of complacency about...
- On massacres The treatment of the Palestinians an...
- Is Arafat finished? Robert Fisk seems to think so.
- Paper of Record? Pah Michael Gove has written a ...
- Was Fortuyn a fascist? Here is the Manifesto of L...
- Out of mind, out of luck ‘High risk of Indo-Pak w...
- Pot and Kettle Mark Steel says that Pim Fortuyn w...
- The future's tide Bill Deedes has a thoughtful ar...
- Immigration and Israel This article about anti-se...
- The Indian Example Name one group of countries th...
- Quote for the week The ultimate purpose of our fo...
- Are they related? There's a disturbing link. Bot...
- In defence of Bribery The Economist has an articl...
- The EU to use Rainbow flag Young man, there's no ...
- Assassins of Liberty Justin Raimondo has a good p...
- Book Alert Ernest Bevin's biography is out from P...
- Loony Tunes The Economist really can pick stupid ...
- Brave Prediction According to this writer in the ...
- Who counts the votes? An old article on election ...
- Democracy? What Democracy From the BBC: In Brus...
- Dreadfully rude I do follow Football, but I am no...
- Random thoughts on Fortuyn There'll be more in de...
- Time to follow the American lead US renounces cou...
- Where's Osama? Oh dear. Me and my big mouth.
- Security begins at home A rather disturbing artic...
- Dutch far-right leader 'shot dead'. And all he wa...
- The we're all right club David Carr says he "hear...
- If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it Tha...
- The Corndog For any NRO Corner fans out there (bo...
- Terrifyingly naive Sacre Bleue. Hugo Young write...
- Conservatives for an Independent Britain - a propo...
-
▼
May
(96)
0 comments:
Post a Comment