Thursday, May 30, 2002
1:04 pm
91/440 or bust. Or both.
Natalie Solent (who thinks I’m an amoral sweetie-pie) asks whether the current mess on the seperation of train and track has anything to do with the European Commission. Well, Natalie, yes it does.
I will point to the wonderful Christina Speight, who writes:
Sometimes one despairs at getting the simplest facts about the EU across even to those who write about it! For instance take the Sunday Telegraph of 22 October where, in writing about the Hatfield rail crash, the journalists write on page 24 "Perhaps the industry should now ... revert to the pre-1948 model of ... regional private sector rail companies owning their own trains, tracks and stations and controlling their own destinies". All very logical one might well think ... even common sense, BUT (with the EU there’s always a "BUT") on page 18 of the same issue Christopher Booker says "I must once again (draw) attention to the Railway Regulation 1992, the instrument responsible for setting up Railtrack. This clearly states that it was issued under the European Communities Act to bring Britain into compliance with EC Directive 91/440, laying down that track ownership must be separated from that of operating companies. The fact that the Government never explained this at the time, even to the then British Rail Board (one of whose members, Simon Jenkins, once told me that they all thought it was just some daft idea of the Treasury’s) should not stop us from putting the blame for this particular idiocy fairly where it is due" [Could Mr Booker take a short walk of 6 pages to tell his fellow journalists? ..ED] {Sunday Telegraph 22/10/00}
(Unfortunately this column does not appear on the Telegraph site)
And we can then go to the source The Railways Regulations 1992 :
In section 2 (1) it says:
The purpose of these Regulations is to provide for the implementation of Council Directive 91/440/EEC of 29th July 1991 on the development of the Community's railways
So there you have it Natalie, it is true.
Not only are they ruining the NHS, but they are ruining the railways. The time to leave is now.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
May
(96)
- Let’s blame Brussels – for a change Both Natalie ...
- Daddy Peaceblogs? Is Steve Chapman going soft? T...
- Blame Europe for everything brigade Who can Tom b...
- Invade France Paul Gottfried is not writing about...
- 91/440 or bust. Or both. Natalie Solent (who thi...
- Oiling the future Jeremy Sapienza points out a st...
- Another day, another deployment Tony Blair told u...
- Minister for whose Transport? Iain Gray is a fair...
- Penny for the Byers So why did Liar Byers hit the...
- Please Lord, don't make us Swiss Some response fr...
- Search me You can now go and look through my arch...
- It begins with a K So there's this territory and ...
- Pro Europeans and child murderers European Court ...
- Shades of Gray John Gray has a stab at analysing ...
- Another reason to get our troops out They've appo...
- Burning Bush For those of us who have this rosy v...
- Happy Monday My improvement at antiwar.com has co...
- Just Leave UN rebukes Britain over smacking.
- New Blog Alert I would like to point you to this ...
- And we still wait After all this waiting the firs...
- Forgotten Corner Looks like our troops will have ...
- Cheery news A minimum of three million people wou...
- The folly of arms control At the risk of dictatin...
- No Free Speech, we're Europeans This should send ...
- So why did they do it? Two takes on the Sinn Fein...
- New Toy The Google news search, may not be perfec...
- Victory over the French Who said that Le Pen was ...
- Intervention and Kashmir Surely you can't keep ou...
- Kashmir source If you want to follow Kashmir, you...
- The Hague Farce Let's ignore India, Pakistan, Kas...
- Different strokes Once again I must thank Iain Mu...
- Page not found If this is happening to your web l...
- Incidentally... Iain Murray puts me straight on m...
- Jump or Push? First they defend him, then they sa...
- Fisked Here's an article that will appear on a nu...
- Searching for meaning over the sea This Irish ele...
- Referendum Postponed? Do you really think that th...
- Gold News I'm puzzled. Nothing new there. Iain ...
- No Downside? My improvement on antiwar.com, Chris...
- Spot the Trot Gosh, a whole BBC online piece on A...
- Through the Mill Knowing how you all seem to dete...
- State Failure This reasonably fair minded assesme...
- Where's Osama? And if he's dead, where's his body?
- So that's why Oswald liked the idea I get wary wh...
- Sense in strange places Someone else notices the ...
- Allies do spy on each other Israeli arts students...
- Thank God for Instapundit Last time I did this I ...
- Convenient Fiction Is the Economist really a free...
- What will unite us? In the Spectator Chris Patten...
- Whose guns were they? So those guns, were they Al...
- Token? Was I the only one who heard, Joao Valera,...
- The Great Dictator "I'm not keen on Emmanuel Gold...
- Only 40 000? Two interesting reports on the (by B...
- News from the High Tory Uplands My improvement at...
- Fair's fair Fred Pruit at Rantburg has told us wh...
- What's your opinion on Liberia? Don't have one? ...
- Where Bias can lead This web log doesn't cover th...
- Who is Pim? An interesting and balanced attempt t...
- Foreign or Domestic? Here's an interesting articl...
- Back to Kosovo Do you remember Tony Blair accusin...
- Another one emerges Sixth Briton held at Camp X-R...
- Cosying up to the commies An interesting, if old ...
- Did I read that right? From an old article by Mar...
- Are you ready for Neo-Imperialism? A thoughtful, ...
- Nope, won't find it here< MSN Search puts me at n...
- Still a menace There's a lot of complacency about...
- On massacres The treatment of the Palestinians an...
- Is Arafat finished? Robert Fisk seems to think so.
- Paper of Record? Pah Michael Gove has written a ...
- Was Fortuyn a fascist? Here is the Manifesto of L...
- Out of mind, out of luck ‘High risk of Indo-Pak w...
- Pot and Kettle Mark Steel says that Pim Fortuyn w...
- The future's tide Bill Deedes has a thoughtful ar...
- Immigration and Israel This article about anti-se...
- The Indian Example Name one group of countries th...
- Quote for the week The ultimate purpose of our fo...
- Are they related? There's a disturbing link. Bot...
- In defence of Bribery The Economist has an articl...
- The EU to use Rainbow flag Young man, there's no ...
- Assassins of Liberty Justin Raimondo has a good p...
- Book Alert Ernest Bevin's biography is out from P...
- Loony Tunes The Economist really can pick stupid ...
- Brave Prediction According to this writer in the ...
- Who counts the votes? An old article on election ...
- Democracy? What Democracy From the BBC: In Brus...
- Dreadfully rude I do follow Football, but I am no...
- Random thoughts on Fortuyn There'll be more in de...
- Time to follow the American lead US renounces cou...
- Where's Osama? Oh dear. Me and my big mouth.
- Security begins at home A rather disturbing artic...
- Dutch far-right leader 'shot dead'. And all he wa...
- The we're all right club David Carr says he "hear...
- If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it Tha...
- The Corndog For any NRO Corner fans out there (bo...
- Terrifyingly naive Sacre Bleue. Hugo Young write...
- Conservatives for an Independent Britain - a propo...
-
▼
May
(96)
0 comments:
Post a Comment