Sunday, December 16, 2001
10:06 am
Doubts on the video
Apart from the first point, I think that the rest of this is rubbish. The point on the Arabic video was quite simple, it was a home video not intended for distribution and taken of Arabs, not locals. And on the lack of culpability, I think that this is a sophists point. The existence of Al Qaeda made this event possible, so its continued existence (and the continued liberty of its organisers) is a threat to the United States. However the first point is telling, I was always doubtful about the authenticity of the letters. Anyway I got this through an e-mail list:
A contradiction exists between Bin Ladin's "new video" and the letters of the hijackers. The new video claims to have "proof" that Bin Ladin did the attack, OK, but why does it say that he thought the hijackers did not know they were about to commit suicide? Did not the letters "uncovered" by the FBI from the "hijackers" luggage shortly after the WTC attack claim that they knew they were about to commit suicide? Therefore we have a contradiction, Bin Laden "claims" (on this new "video") that the hijackers did NOT know they were about to commit suicide, yet earlier a few weeks ago when the hijackers luggage was "discovered", letters were found which said the hijackers KNEW that they were going to commit suicide on the planes, why such a big discrepancy? Obviously the lies have reached such a point where they have got clumsy. Also, why was an ARABIC "video" found in Jalalabad where the people don't speak Arabic? If it was for distribution around the Arabic world then they'd at least find much more of these tapes, right? Another thing, this seems to me to be an attempt to further demonise Bin Ladin by saying that he "tricks" people to commit suicide, thus making more people in the Muslim world oppose him and some of the just causes he stands for. More more thing, if the people then explain this contradiction away as "lack of knowledge due to the cells being seperate", then how can Bin Ladin be blamed for organising this if he did not know what they were doing? Think about it, if these "terrorist" cells really don't know what each other is doing, then how can we blame Osama for the attacks? So, if the people explain the contradiction between Bin Ladin's video and the letters of the "hijackers" as due to the fact that these cells don't know what each other cell is doing, then we CANNOT blame Osama for "conceiving, organising and carrying out the attacks."
Apart from the first point, I think that the rest of this is rubbish. The point on the Arabic video was quite simple, it was a home video not intended for distribution and taken of Arabs, not locals. And on the lack of culpability, I think that this is a sophists point. The existence of Al Qaeda made this event possible, so its continued existence (and the continued liberty of its organisers) is a threat to the United States. However the first point is telling, I was always doubtful about the authenticity of the letters. Anyway I got this through an e-mail list:
A contradiction exists between Bin Ladin's "new video" and the letters of the hijackers. The new video claims to have "proof" that Bin Ladin did the attack, OK, but why does it say that he thought the hijackers did not know they were about to commit suicide? Did not the letters "uncovered" by the FBI from the "hijackers" luggage shortly after the WTC attack claim that they knew they were about to commit suicide? Therefore we have a contradiction, Bin Laden "claims" (on this new "video") that the hijackers did NOT know they were about to commit suicide, yet earlier a few weeks ago when the hijackers luggage was "discovered", letters were found which said the hijackers KNEW that they were going to commit suicide on the planes, why such a big discrepancy? Obviously the lies have reached such a point where they have got clumsy. Also, why was an ARABIC "video" found in Jalalabad where the people don't speak Arabic? If it was for distribution around the Arabic world then they'd at least find much more of these tapes, right? Another thing, this seems to me to be an attempt to further demonise Bin Ladin by saying that he "tricks" people to commit suicide, thus making more people in the Muslim world oppose him and some of the just causes he stands for. More more thing, if the people then explain this contradiction away as "lack of knowledge due to the cells being seperate", then how can Bin Ladin be blamed for organising this if he did not know what they were doing? Think about it, if these "terrorist" cells really don't know what each other is doing, then how can we blame Osama for the attacks? So, if the people explain the contradiction between Bin Ladin's video and the letters of the "hijackers" as due to the fact that these cells don't know what each other cell is doing, then we CANNOT blame Osama for "conceiving, organising and carrying out the attacks."
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2001
(202)
-
▼
December
(71)
- Happy New Year And now my new year question, does...
- Margolis caught out Eric Margolis has just penned...
- Free Republic Feedback OK some feedback from Free...
- Who said this? Indeed, because we share the euro ...
- Bennett's Petard I've been directed (by Iain Mur...
- India and Pakistan Redux Another point on India a...
- Today's article Little feedback (alright no feedb...
- The Guardian makes sense - shock The article that...
- Another one James Alexander McLintock is being he...
- No nonsense or too boring for words? Any comments...
- What a wag George Fernandes the Indian defence mi...
- Iain Murray has highlighted an article in the Time...
- More evidence that Charles Kennedy is doing Iain D...
- With this India-Pakistan standoff still inching ah...
- There they go again Is there anything good about ...
- Will this be the next crusade? Sam Francis starts...
- Appeasers? Lest there be any doubt where the gove...
- Shock. Terrorism at home Does Welfare Cause Terr...
- How to work my links I have finally got the links...
- Video Nasty Bin Laden's latest video has been por...
- EUphobia The EU have put out a list of groups the...
- Scared of logic To those few of you who have been...
- Feedack: This from an irate reader: Thanks for t...
- I know it's Christmas, but before I forget I've be...
- Now I find it is thanks due to Brian Linse for pay...
- A great piece from Matthew Parris, who lampoons fa...
- They don't like it up 'em The Yanks over at Free ...
- Gee, thanks. A real Goldstein paid for my web l...
- I suppose its fame of a sort. I've been positione...
- Thank You To whoever removed the advertising from...
- This is more or less what I sent out to the subscr...
- Thank you to Natalie Solent for linking to me as h...
- I wonder what's going to happen over this little d...
- Euro Question Why does the punditocracy assume th...
- What is the truth about this bombed convoy? If it...
- A quick trip over to the Conservative Friends of I...
- As a service to all American supporters of Sinn Fe...
- I won the argument. The Counterfeit conservatives...
- Another Blog mention, this time from the American ...
- The House of Lord’s debate on Afghanistan is worth...
- Now we need an alliance with Russia. No matter th...
- Some speculation that America was planning to depo...
- Something on the roots of Islamic anger. Says tha...
- Fantastic piece, if two months old, from Justin Ra...
- Last week's article has sparked off a wide ranging...
- A revolt This is news, an Early Day Motion in the...
- What are they playing at? Now they're bugging dis...
- Tora Bora's fallen (they say) and Al Qaeda's been ...
- Praise to the BBC I don't usually say that the BB...
- Doubts on the video Apart from the first point, I...
- Americans 'covered up massacre of 280 Taliban': B...
- Will it get banned this time? More than a year ag...
- Excellent Richard Littlejohn piece in The Sun: ON...
- Well, it started, some are doubting the authentici...
- Weirdo Roundup Is this guy for real? TODAY'S LET...
- Birds of a White Feather I know I shouldn't be lo...
- After all the false starts, the Telegraph finally ...
- So, UK Mortgages are the cheapest in europe. Ther...
- Big Words From The Sun TONY Blair was last nigh...
- Remember when? Its not instant feedback, but its ...
- Around the Web An old Free Life Commentary from S...
- Happenings in BlogLand For daring to question the...
- That was fast It was a mere matter of hours ago t...
- Recomendation I've been recommended by Natalie So...
- Such an easy war, this. Go in defeat the Taliban,...
- Guess what folded? I never direct you to the Lib ...
- Black Boxes. Have any of the black boxes become p...
- Why oh Why? That stalwart MP Paul Marsden is a to...
- Blunkett spells it out According to David Blunket...
- Egg on face time Those eighty prisoners, were the...
- Why am I not surprised? The BBC don't like the Sw...
-
▼
December
(71)
0 comments:
Post a Comment