Monday, December 31, 2001
2:42 pm
Bennett's Petard
I've been directed (by Iain Murray) to the indefatigable Jim Bennett's latest "Anglosphere" column in which he praises web logs. Saith Mr Bennett:
This pan-Anglosphere aspect to blogspace has permitted a much richer, closer and more critical examination of precisely who is saying what. The typical chattering class anti-Americanism of, say, the Guardian or The Nation is raked through point by point and torn to shreds within hours of publication.
All well and good, but in the previous sentence he says:
For every link to, say, the English edition of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, there are hundreds to the London Evening Telegraph or the Times.
As any Londoner would be able to tell their fellow Anglospheracist Mr Bennett, there is a London Evening Standard (very rarely with London appended) and a Daily Telegraph (only called the London Telegraph outside the UK), but no London Evening Telegraph.
Sorry, I just could not resist.
Pakistan and India, yet again
My developing obsession with the India - Pakistan stand off is getting me to wonder what the Anglosphere angle is. The Anglosphere is the idea that Britain and America share so much that we should forget strategic interests and look at shared cultural references as the basis for foreign policy or as Mr Bennett says "that the English-speaking nations of the globe constitute a community possessing a natural basis for cooperation on a wide range of issues". It is, as I will be the first to admit, the hot new foreign policy idea on the right in Britain rather than the "crackpot realism" that I wail on about.
Any way, both India and Pakistan have some claim to be within the Anglosphere. After all English is their de facto national language, more then Punjabi or Hindi. They both have a considerable amount of British civic infrastructure and through their substantial emigre communities they have strong living links with many of the "White Commonwealth" (plus the US) that forms the core of the Anglosphere.
So if culture beats geography in national interest, should we back India or Pakistan; or are neither fully within the Anglosphere?
I've been directed (by Iain Murray) to the indefatigable Jim Bennett's latest "Anglosphere" column in which he praises web logs. Saith Mr Bennett:
This pan-Anglosphere aspect to blogspace has permitted a much richer, closer and more critical examination of precisely who is saying what. The typical chattering class anti-Americanism of, say, the Guardian or The Nation is raked through point by point and torn to shreds within hours of publication.
All well and good, but in the previous sentence he says:
For every link to, say, the English edition of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, there are hundreds to the London Evening Telegraph or the Times.
As any Londoner would be able to tell their fellow Anglospheracist Mr Bennett, there is a London Evening Standard (very rarely with London appended) and a Daily Telegraph (only called the London Telegraph outside the UK), but no London Evening Telegraph.
Sorry, I just could not resist.
Pakistan and India, yet again
My developing obsession with the India - Pakistan stand off is getting me to wonder what the Anglosphere angle is. The Anglosphere is the idea that Britain and America share so much that we should forget strategic interests and look at shared cultural references as the basis for foreign policy or as Mr Bennett says "that the English-speaking nations of the globe constitute a community possessing a natural basis for cooperation on a wide range of issues". It is, as I will be the first to admit, the hot new foreign policy idea on the right in Britain rather than the "crackpot realism" that I wail on about.
Any way, both India and Pakistan have some claim to be within the Anglosphere. After all English is their de facto national language, more then Punjabi or Hindi. They both have a considerable amount of British civic infrastructure and through their substantial emigre communities they have strong living links with many of the "White Commonwealth" (plus the US) that forms the core of the Anglosphere.
So if culture beats geography in national interest, should we back India or Pakistan; or are neither fully within the Anglosphere?
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2001
(202)
-
▼
December
(71)
- Happy New Year And now my new year question, does...
- Margolis caught out Eric Margolis has just penned...
- Free Republic Feedback OK some feedback from Free...
- Who said this? Indeed, because we share the euro ...
- Bennett's Petard I've been directed (by Iain Mur...
- India and Pakistan Redux Another point on India a...
- Today's article Little feedback (alright no feedb...
- The Guardian makes sense - shock The article that...
- Another one James Alexander McLintock is being he...
- No nonsense or too boring for words? Any comments...
- What a wag George Fernandes the Indian defence mi...
- Iain Murray has highlighted an article in the Time...
- More evidence that Charles Kennedy is doing Iain D...
- With this India-Pakistan standoff still inching ah...
- There they go again Is there anything good about ...
- Will this be the next crusade? Sam Francis starts...
- Appeasers? Lest there be any doubt where the gove...
- Shock. Terrorism at home Does Welfare Cause Terr...
- How to work my links I have finally got the links...
- Video Nasty Bin Laden's latest video has been por...
- EUphobia The EU have put out a list of groups the...
- Scared of logic To those few of you who have been...
- Feedack: This from an irate reader: Thanks for t...
- I know it's Christmas, but before I forget I've be...
- Now I find it is thanks due to Brian Linse for pay...
- A great piece from Matthew Parris, who lampoons fa...
- They don't like it up 'em The Yanks over at Free ...
- Gee, thanks. A real Goldstein paid for my web l...
- I suppose its fame of a sort. I've been positione...
- Thank You To whoever removed the advertising from...
- This is more or less what I sent out to the subscr...
- Thank you to Natalie Solent for linking to me as h...
- I wonder what's going to happen over this little d...
- Euro Question Why does the punditocracy assume th...
- What is the truth about this bombed convoy? If it...
- A quick trip over to the Conservative Friends of I...
- As a service to all American supporters of Sinn Fe...
- I won the argument. The Counterfeit conservatives...
- Another Blog mention, this time from the American ...
- The House of Lord’s debate on Afghanistan is worth...
- Now we need an alliance with Russia. No matter th...
- Some speculation that America was planning to depo...
- Something on the roots of Islamic anger. Says tha...
- Fantastic piece, if two months old, from Justin Ra...
- Last week's article has sparked off a wide ranging...
- A revolt This is news, an Early Day Motion in the...
- What are they playing at? Now they're bugging dis...
- Tora Bora's fallen (they say) and Al Qaeda's been ...
- Praise to the BBC I don't usually say that the BB...
- Doubts on the video Apart from the first point, I...
- Americans 'covered up massacre of 280 Taliban': B...
- Will it get banned this time? More than a year ag...
- Excellent Richard Littlejohn piece in The Sun: ON...
- Well, it started, some are doubting the authentici...
- Weirdo Roundup Is this guy for real? TODAY'S LET...
- Birds of a White Feather I know I shouldn't be lo...
- After all the false starts, the Telegraph finally ...
- So, UK Mortgages are the cheapest in europe. Ther...
- Big Words From The Sun TONY Blair was last nigh...
- Remember when? Its not instant feedback, but its ...
- Around the Web An old Free Life Commentary from S...
- Happenings in BlogLand For daring to question the...
- That was fast It was a mere matter of hours ago t...
- Recomendation I've been recommended by Natalie So...
- Such an easy war, this. Go in defeat the Taliban,...
- Guess what folded? I never direct you to the Lib ...
- Black Boxes. Have any of the black boxes become p...
- Why oh Why? That stalwart MP Paul Marsden is a to...
- Blunkett spells it out According to David Blunket...
- Egg on face time Those eighty prisoners, were the...
- Why am I not surprised? The BBC don't like the Sw...
-
▼
December
(71)
0 comments:
Post a Comment