Sunday, June 09, 2002
8:24 pm
Plenty of Questions, Very Few Answers
Emmanuel Goldstein has kindly asked me to contribute to his weblog, Airstrip One, and I have enthusiastically accepted as there is no thing anybody who writes likes better than entry into the blogosphere. Please note that my contributions will endeavour to maintain the high quality that has made me a regular reader of Airstrip One for many months.
My current career is in the financial services, but previous to this, a doctoral thesis was completed in the history of science. All details spared though if you wish to read the tome, please feel free to use Inter Library Loan and a microfiche reader.
Since my academic background is in history, anything written here will be informed by the historical context within which current policy or opinion is located. (Please comment if you find any mistakes or disagree with the interpretation given) However, contemporary events remain within the realm of our influence, and we should question the grand narratives that are used to justify particular policies or the maintenance of the status quo in British foreign policy.
For example, it is an unspoken assumption that we live in a world with one superpower. Yet, what justifies America’s entitlement to this term, with its connotations of unique power and strength in contrast to the other great powers? America’s economy is in relative economic decline and has been so for decades. The United States spends more on defence than any other nation but has not fought a major land war with another great power since Korea. Its diplomatic actions are constrained by the need to act in concert with others when it is willing to exercise its power in other regions. Would it be more accurate to describe the United States of America as a great power that is able to act globally but not on an individual basis? If so, we should move away from George Bush Sr’s concept of a ‘New World Order’, where the US acts as a global policeman and realise that we have finally entered the multipolar world that Paul Kennedy anticipated with “The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers”.
If this is the case, then the United Kingdom has an opportunity to renegotiate and redefine its relationships with the United States and Europe over the next decade in order to rediscover the freedom of action that it lost following the various scuttles of Empire and the confinement of the Cold War.
If we look to examples in Europe, will we take heed of the lessons provided by Norway, Finland and Switzerland as they define themselves against a greater power? What strategy will best serve our interests? What are the costs of maintaining the current status quo?
Philip Chaston
Emmanuel Goldstein has kindly asked me to contribute to his weblog, Airstrip One, and I have enthusiastically accepted as there is no thing anybody who writes likes better than entry into the blogosphere. Please note that my contributions will endeavour to maintain the high quality that has made me a regular reader of Airstrip One for many months.
My current career is in the financial services, but previous to this, a doctoral thesis was completed in the history of science. All details spared though if you wish to read the tome, please feel free to use Inter Library Loan and a microfiche reader.
Since my academic background is in history, anything written here will be informed by the historical context within which current policy or opinion is located. (Please comment if you find any mistakes or disagree with the interpretation given) However, contemporary events remain within the realm of our influence, and we should question the grand narratives that are used to justify particular policies or the maintenance of the status quo in British foreign policy.
For example, it is an unspoken assumption that we live in a world with one superpower. Yet, what justifies America’s entitlement to this term, with its connotations of unique power and strength in contrast to the other great powers? America’s economy is in relative economic decline and has been so for decades. The United States spends more on defence than any other nation but has not fought a major land war with another great power since Korea. Its diplomatic actions are constrained by the need to act in concert with others when it is willing to exercise its power in other regions. Would it be more accurate to describe the United States of America as a great power that is able to act globally but not on an individual basis? If so, we should move away from George Bush Sr’s concept of a ‘New World Order’, where the US acts as a global policeman and realise that we have finally entered the multipolar world that Paul Kennedy anticipated with “The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers”.
If this is the case, then the United Kingdom has an opportunity to renegotiate and redefine its relationships with the United States and Europe over the next decade in order to rediscover the freedom of action that it lost following the various scuttles of Empire and the confinement of the Cold War.
If we look to examples in Europe, will we take heed of the lessons provided by Norway, Finland and Switzerland as they define themselves against a greater power? What strategy will best serve our interests? What are the costs of maintaining the current status quo?
Philip Chaston
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
June
(61)
- Sometimes you just despair The United Kingdom (Un...
- That ever so stable Eurozone German Banks are goi...
- Yes, Dorothy, it could happen here Portugal cedes...
- Homeland Security Sir David Omand, former Permane...
- Leave the European Movement alone The Bruges grou...
- Was it worth it for Poland? There's a very intere...
- Double Consent It pains me when I have to disagre...
- Al Qaeda's dead In this rather confusing analysis...
- A use for Byers According to David Farrer.
- Not of the left This little article really says w...
- Coming to a government near you Spain is to grant...
- The Beginning of the End for Zimbabwe The governm...
- Europe and Immigration Immigration and Enlargemen...
- What's wrong with Pre-emption? An interesting art...
- On Nepal It looks like the Maoists are getting a ...
- The 'War on Terror' (Nepal Theatre) Perhaps the M...
- Dancing to the tune of 1907 In the first decade ...
- We're (sort of) going home So we are really and t...
- I'm sure slander was not intended... Iain Murray ...
- In Defence of a Blair Now I'm not going to preten...
- Intriguing From the Telegraph's City Comment: It...
- That roaring success the Euro Both letters from t...
- Spinning Away They really are losing their touch....
- Something good Every now and again it doesn't all...
- Left Behind? Brendan O’Neil has upset a couple of...
- Missing the point This idiotic outburst shows why...
- The beam in your own eye Expect to hear some outr...
- Not Democratic I know, I know. I don't actually ...
- How to help the IRA A rather disturbing follow up...
- Sanction Stupidity So we're thinking about imposi...
- You know what they say about the size of your bomb...
- Goodbye to the Malvinas HMG has decided to scrap ...
- End of the ABM Treaty The Anti-Ballistic Missile ...
- Are they with us? So now the IRA are shown to be ...
- Keep out of Kashmir According to this bishop Brit...
- Well Protected It's a good thing that we have an ...
- History Mystery I'm puzzled, who didn't know abou...
- Sucked into the Middle East Ever since the "war o...
- Where's Bin Laden? Sorry for asking (seems few ot...
- And kill their familes too Now am I being squeami...
- And the cynics come crawling out Will no one beli...
- Evenhanded Just to show that the European Union i...
- New Conspiracy Theory Was Al Qaeda planning to bl...
- Left on the bench Excellent disection of the anti...
- Democracy? Pah Afghanistan is holding a Loya Jir...
- Interesting Meeting From the Peaceniks at the Com...
- Dishing the Tories My improvement, Christopher Mo...
- Karen De Coster writes an interesting review of "T...
- China to fight Maoists I know, that's where they ...
- First and last time I got mentioned in the Nation...
- On Kashmir... David Farrer says it all.
- Plenty of Questions, Very Few Answers Emmanuel Go...
- Reprieve Well thank God for that. India turns dow...
- Now for someting completely suicidal Perhaps this...
- Absent Danger While you're about it, you could do...
- Background on Zim An interesting article on Zimba...
- Zim Watch I know it's been a while, but this may ...
- Suicide Bombing and other Benefits of Engagement ...
- Closer to the Brink It seems that Brits have been...
- Corruption at the ECB Just as the Euro was recove...
- Read the whole article Tom Burroughes lambasts Pa...
-
▼
June
(61)
0 comments:
Post a Comment