Monday, November 25, 2002
10:39 pm
Wooing the West - 25th November 2002, 22.38
Over the last year, China has seen American forces encroach on its attempts to develop a 'sphere of influence' in Central Asia through the Shanghai five.
The low-key dialogue between China and NATO, mentioned in an earlier post, has been started due to two developments: the shift of Russia towards the United States that China now perceives as permanent; and the realisation that they have been a strategic loser from the 'war on terror'. As Western forces support existing regimes and build bases in Central Asia and South East Asia, regions which China views as 'areas of influence', the Communist leadership has had to swallow its pride and develop a relationship with the West's military alliance, NATO.
However, the hold of Western forces in Central Asia, Afghanistan and Pakistan is very fragile and depends upon the continued goodwill and neutrality of this mercurial giant. It is only four months ago that Chinese naval ships made the first circumnavigation of the globe for their country. China is expanding its role in international diplomacy: as an arbiter in regional disputes throughout Asia and as an intermediary between the developing world and the rich North. The reasons are as follows:
It was not until the mid-1990s that China, under the stewardship of Jiang Zemin, emerged as a regional power with global ambitions capable of becoming a major player in crisis situations around the world.
China's Communist Party, which is reshaping itself into a party of technocrats, businessmen and globe-trotting diplomats, is keen to foster the new image of Beijing as a global heavyweight and intermediary.
The People's Daily, the party's flagship newspaper, in an editorial last week, defined China's diplomacy as a "new security concept" of "working to safeguard world peace and promote common prosperity." Zhou Fuyuan, a senior official from east China's Jiangsu Province, was quoted as saying by the official Xinhua News Agency last week, "We must make the most of strategic opportunities facing us in the first two decades of the new century and open wider to and increase exchanges with the outside world,"
But analysts say China's ambitions are also aimed at countering what it perceives as America's growing "hegemony" throughout the world, which has brought U.S. troops stationed along its western borders.
"China is wary of the U.S.-led global security system of bilateral military alliances, which it fears will lead to a monopoly of power," said Ming Wei, a professor of international relations at Shanghai University.
Even as American hegemony drives forward with the 'war on terror', other nations adapt by engaging with the existing system of diplomacy and acting as regional counterweights with global pretensions. Thirty years from now, historians will look back and write that America's reaction to the 11th September bombings in turn deepened the drive towards a European superstate, westernised Russia and forced China to engage in global diplomacy.
As yet, the long-term trends are opaque for India or the Middle East.
Over the last year, China has seen American forces encroach on its attempts to develop a 'sphere of influence' in Central Asia through the Shanghai five.
The low-key dialogue between China and NATO, mentioned in an earlier post, has been started due to two developments: the shift of Russia towards the United States that China now perceives as permanent; and the realisation that they have been a strategic loser from the 'war on terror'. As Western forces support existing regimes and build bases in Central Asia and South East Asia, regions which China views as 'areas of influence', the Communist leadership has had to swallow its pride and develop a relationship with the West's military alliance, NATO.
However, the hold of Western forces in Central Asia, Afghanistan and Pakistan is very fragile and depends upon the continued goodwill and neutrality of this mercurial giant. It is only four months ago that Chinese naval ships made the first circumnavigation of the globe for their country. China is expanding its role in international diplomacy: as an arbiter in regional disputes throughout Asia and as an intermediary between the developing world and the rich North. The reasons are as follows:
It was not until the mid-1990s that China, under the stewardship of Jiang Zemin, emerged as a regional power with global ambitions capable of becoming a major player in crisis situations around the world.
China's Communist Party, which is reshaping itself into a party of technocrats, businessmen and globe-trotting diplomats, is keen to foster the new image of Beijing as a global heavyweight and intermediary.
The People's Daily, the party's flagship newspaper, in an editorial last week, defined China's diplomacy as a "new security concept" of "working to safeguard world peace and promote common prosperity." Zhou Fuyuan, a senior official from east China's Jiangsu Province, was quoted as saying by the official Xinhua News Agency last week, "We must make the most of strategic opportunities facing us in the first two decades of the new century and open wider to and increase exchanges with the outside world,"
But analysts say China's ambitions are also aimed at countering what it perceives as America's growing "hegemony" throughout the world, which has brought U.S. troops stationed along its western borders.
"China is wary of the U.S.-led global security system of bilateral military alliances, which it fears will lead to a monopoly of power," said Ming Wei, a professor of international relations at Shanghai University.
Even as American hegemony drives forward with the 'war on terror', other nations adapt by engaging with the existing system of diplomacy and acting as regional counterweights with global pretensions. Thirty years from now, historians will look back and write that America's reaction to the 11th September bombings in turn deepened the drive towards a European superstate, westernised Russia and forced China to engage in global diplomacy.
As yet, the long-term trends are opaque for India or the Middle East.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
November
(54)
- Blair's view - 30th November 2002, 21.37 Tony Bla...
- No less determined to integrate - 30th November 20...
- Where do the smaller states stand? - 30th November...
- Euronitis - 30th November 2002, 20.25 Last week, ...
- Not good - 28th November 2002, 22.41 Current deve...
- Do I look big in this? - 28th November 2002, 22.14...
- Will London be a target? - 28th November 2002, 22....
- And what will we do when we get there? Once again...
- Err, Turkey's not in Europe Srdja Trifkovic pours...
- Should Parliament vote to deploy troops? - 25th No...
- Falling between two stools - 25th November 2002, 2...
- Giscard D'Estaing, Defender of Christendom - 26th ...
- Wooing the West - 25th November 2002, 22.38 Over ...
- Leave Us Alone - 24th November 2002, 20.37 At fir...
- The Axis Powers strengthened - 24th November 2002,...
- The Role of Religion in the European Constitution ...
- Lost an enemy, yet to find a role - 23rd November ...
- Senescence - 21st November 2002, 22.36 When an in...
- What is Netanyahu playing at? - 21st November 2002...
- Is it beginning to strike a nerve? - 21st November...
- From Vancouver to Vladivostok - 19th November 2002...
- An Overview - 19th November 2002, 21.28 Here's a ...
- Rapid Reaction NATO - 18th November 2002, 22.02 U...
- Hear, Hear - 18th November 2002, 21.56 Tony Benn ...
- Worth the Risk? Terrorism is something that intru...
- North Americans Turfed Out (NATO) - 17th November ...
- United States refuses to support hate speech resol...
- Second Most Powerful Nation - 17th November 2002, ...
- Cyanide Plot - 16th November 2002, 23.10 Terroris...
- Libertarian Defence - 16th November 2002, 13.58 F...
- German Libertarianism - 16th November 2002, 13.52 ...
- Oxymoron: Libertarian Realpolitik - 16th November ...
- The Tories have signed up to this - 15th November ...
- Romano Prodi Muses - 15th November 2002, 21.36 An...
- The only realist stance In the National Interest,...
- Empty Cooing Mick Hume takes apart the convention...
- A "Ring of Friends" - 13th November 2002, 22.06 I...
- Skating away on the Thin Ice of the New Day 12th N...
- Still Legal This should worry all web loggers. T...
- More Demands 12/11/02 23rd July 1914: The Austro...
- Anti-Americanism: How powerful is it? 11th Novembe...
- The Russia-EU Summit 11th November 2002, 23.18 An...
- Libertarian and National Defence 11th November 200...
- Royal Intrusion So who was Charles's man accused ...
- Wrong, wrong, wrong Seems like a few helpings of ...
- UNanimity 10th November 2002, 22.55 It is now cle...
- Domestic Politics Intrusion Is IDS finished? Pro...
- Referendum on an E.U. Constitution? No Chance. 7...
- Levelling the Playing Field - 4th November 2002, 2...
- Are we living in Cloud Cuckoo Land? 3rd November 2...
- Zimwatch: Government capabilities are failing 2nd ...
- The Whig View of the EU - 2nd November 2002, 19.20...
- Plagiarism 1st November 2002, 23.36 GMT No excuse...
- PFI Friday - 1st November 2002, 19.47 GMT With th...
-
▼
November
(54)
0 comments:
Post a Comment