Saturday, November 30, 2002
9:37 pm
Blair's view - 30th November 2002, 21.37
Tony Blair, well informed about the developments on the continent and weathering the pressures of war with European change, made a keynote speech in Cardiff yesterday, welcoming enlargement. The text is here.
There is nothing in this speech to be welcomed, as Blair throws away what little sovereignty we have left, except on tax and the Charter of Rights. The Prime Minister maintains his wish to be a "leader in Europe" and not a follower like all of his predecessors. He repeats the list of lies that we hear so often about how good Europe has been for us. He would love to go into the Euro, economic circumstances permitting. On first reading, it appears to strengthen the intergovernmental agenda that Britain has supposed to have been promoting since 1997. It is deeply integrationist in its assumptions and goals. The main points are as follows:
1) A 'team presidency' with rotating candidates from all countries and a permanent President to provide continuity and leadership. This was a sop to the small countries to show that they would not be dominated by the 'Big Six'.
2) Transparency through the publication of national positions in councils. Wouldn't televising them be even better?
3) More QMV. The Eurodrug of choice.
4) Communitisation of the Justice and Home affairs pillar. This heralds Europol and continental police on our territory. Wave goodbye to the common law, habeas corpus and civil liberties.
5) Quicker fines from the Commission. Did Blair get tetchy over French beef?
6) No communitisation of defence or foreign policy. But, of course that is not the whole story...
7) "Again we need more Europe, not less. We need new decision making methods to get better value for money out of European defence budgets: strong peer review mechanisms; a European Defence Capability Development Agency, responsible to and run by the Member States, charged with identifying how capability gaps need to be filled and taking forward procurement projects to fill them; and further moves towards more open defence procurement to save on costly national protectionism."
8) A stronger European Parliament (but not Westminster), Commission and Council with plenty of Nulab nonsense but no actual gritty detail.
9) "We need a stronger Court of Justice.I agree with the strengthening proposed by a distinguished group of British Conservatives in their recent well-argued proposals." Presumably the usual suspects.
And finally, the goal chosen is one that is already lost but our government is unwilling to recognise this fact.
The essence of unity, in my view, is to regard Europe as it grows in power, as a partner with the United States; not either its servant or its rival. (from the passage on defence)
This is a one-off opportunity for reform: to set Europe on a clear course for the future, a Europe that as I have said before can be a superpower, if not a superstate. It is a future in which I want Britain to play its full and complete part. (Blair's closing words)
Never have I come so close to throwing my monitor out of the window at having to read this list of crap. This bloody idiot hasn't learnt his lesson and he's going to throw everything away because he thinks he can smarm both Europe and the States.
I'd say "God help us" if I believed in him.
Tony Blair, well informed about the developments on the continent and weathering the pressures of war with European change, made a keynote speech in Cardiff yesterday, welcoming enlargement. The text is here.
There is nothing in this speech to be welcomed, as Blair throws away what little sovereignty we have left, except on tax and the Charter of Rights. The Prime Minister maintains his wish to be a "leader in Europe" and not a follower like all of his predecessors. He repeats the list of lies that we hear so often about how good Europe has been for us. He would love to go into the Euro, economic circumstances permitting. On first reading, it appears to strengthen the intergovernmental agenda that Britain has supposed to have been promoting since 1997. It is deeply integrationist in its assumptions and goals. The main points are as follows:
1) A 'team presidency' with rotating candidates from all countries and a permanent President to provide continuity and leadership. This was a sop to the small countries to show that they would not be dominated by the 'Big Six'.
2) Transparency through the publication of national positions in councils. Wouldn't televising them be even better?
3) More QMV. The Eurodrug of choice.
4) Communitisation of the Justice and Home affairs pillar. This heralds Europol and continental police on our territory. Wave goodbye to the common law, habeas corpus and civil liberties.
5) Quicker fines from the Commission. Did Blair get tetchy over French beef?
6) No communitisation of defence or foreign policy. But, of course that is not the whole story...
7) "Again we need more Europe, not less. We need new decision making methods to get better value for money out of European defence budgets: strong peer review mechanisms; a European Defence Capability Development Agency, responsible to and run by the Member States, charged with identifying how capability gaps need to be filled and taking forward procurement projects to fill them; and further moves towards more open defence procurement to save on costly national protectionism."
8) A stronger European Parliament (but not Westminster), Commission and Council with plenty of Nulab nonsense but no actual gritty detail.
9) "We need a stronger Court of Justice.I agree with the strengthening proposed by a distinguished group of British Conservatives in their recent well-argued proposals." Presumably the usual suspects.
And finally, the goal chosen is one that is already lost but our government is unwilling to recognise this fact.
The essence of unity, in my view, is to regard Europe as it grows in power, as a partner with the United States; not either its servant or its rival. (from the passage on defence)
This is a one-off opportunity for reform: to set Europe on a clear course for the future, a Europe that as I have said before can be a superpower, if not a superstate. It is a future in which I want Britain to play its full and complete part. (Blair's closing words)
Never have I come so close to throwing my monitor out of the window at having to read this list of crap. This bloody idiot hasn't learnt his lesson and he's going to throw everything away because he thinks he can smarm both Europe and the States.
I'd say "God help us" if I believed in him.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
November
(54)
- Blair's view - 30th November 2002, 21.37 Tony Bla...
- No less determined to integrate - 30th November 20...
- Where do the smaller states stand? - 30th November...
- Euronitis - 30th November 2002, 20.25 Last week, ...
- Not good - 28th November 2002, 22.41 Current deve...
- Do I look big in this? - 28th November 2002, 22.14...
- Will London be a target? - 28th November 2002, 22....
- And what will we do when we get there? Once again...
- Err, Turkey's not in Europe Srdja Trifkovic pours...
- Should Parliament vote to deploy troops? - 25th No...
- Falling between two stools - 25th November 2002, 2...
- Giscard D'Estaing, Defender of Christendom - 26th ...
- Wooing the West - 25th November 2002, 22.38 Over ...
- Leave Us Alone - 24th November 2002, 20.37 At fir...
- The Axis Powers strengthened - 24th November 2002,...
- The Role of Religion in the European Constitution ...
- Lost an enemy, yet to find a role - 23rd November ...
- Senescence - 21st November 2002, 22.36 When an in...
- What is Netanyahu playing at? - 21st November 2002...
- Is it beginning to strike a nerve? - 21st November...
- From Vancouver to Vladivostok - 19th November 2002...
- An Overview - 19th November 2002, 21.28 Here's a ...
- Rapid Reaction NATO - 18th November 2002, 22.02 U...
- Hear, Hear - 18th November 2002, 21.56 Tony Benn ...
- Worth the Risk? Terrorism is something that intru...
- North Americans Turfed Out (NATO) - 17th November ...
- United States refuses to support hate speech resol...
- Second Most Powerful Nation - 17th November 2002, ...
- Cyanide Plot - 16th November 2002, 23.10 Terroris...
- Libertarian Defence - 16th November 2002, 13.58 F...
- German Libertarianism - 16th November 2002, 13.52 ...
- Oxymoron: Libertarian Realpolitik - 16th November ...
- The Tories have signed up to this - 15th November ...
- Romano Prodi Muses - 15th November 2002, 21.36 An...
- The only realist stance In the National Interest,...
- Empty Cooing Mick Hume takes apart the convention...
- A "Ring of Friends" - 13th November 2002, 22.06 I...
- Skating away on the Thin Ice of the New Day 12th N...
- Still Legal This should worry all web loggers. T...
- More Demands 12/11/02 23rd July 1914: The Austro...
- Anti-Americanism: How powerful is it? 11th Novembe...
- The Russia-EU Summit 11th November 2002, 23.18 An...
- Libertarian and National Defence 11th November 200...
- Royal Intrusion So who was Charles's man accused ...
- Wrong, wrong, wrong Seems like a few helpings of ...
- UNanimity 10th November 2002, 22.55 It is now cle...
- Domestic Politics Intrusion Is IDS finished? Pro...
- Referendum on an E.U. Constitution? No Chance. 7...
- Levelling the Playing Field - 4th November 2002, 2...
- Are we living in Cloud Cuckoo Land? 3rd November 2...
- Zimwatch: Government capabilities are failing 2nd ...
- The Whig View of the EU - 2nd November 2002, 19.20...
- Plagiarism 1st November 2002, 23.36 GMT No excuse...
- PFI Friday - 1st November 2002, 19.47 GMT With th...
-
▼
November
(54)
0 comments:
Post a Comment