Sunday, November 11, 2001
11:18 pm
And another thing. According to The Telegraph, Bin Laden has nukes:
In his first interview since the September 11 attacks, bin Laden told Hamid Mir, a Pakistani journalist who is working on a biography of the terrorist: "We have chemical and nuclear weapons as a deterrent and if America used them against us we reserve the right to use them."
He refused to say where he had got the nuclear weapons from although it is suspected that they might come from Pakistan where two nuclear scientists with links to bin Laden were arrested last week.
Now let me get this straight, Bin Laden can't be believed when he denies having anything to do with this (OK, I wouldn't believe him either), but when he's claiming to have nuclear weapons we take his word for it? What's less likely, an Islamic suicide attempt is conducted without this chap in a cave, or that this non-Governmental organisation has nukes? Occam's razor anyone.
Myself I think he's bluffing.
Any Islamic theologians out there (or anyone out there at all)? Would lying to a Muslim journalist qualify as lying to one of the Umma (bad) rather than lying to the ultimate audience, who are infidel (and so good).
In his first interview since the September 11 attacks, bin Laden told Hamid Mir, a Pakistani journalist who is working on a biography of the terrorist: "We have chemical and nuclear weapons as a deterrent and if America used them against us we reserve the right to use them."
He refused to say where he had got the nuclear weapons from although it is suspected that they might come from Pakistan where two nuclear scientists with links to bin Laden were arrested last week.
Now let me get this straight, Bin Laden can't be believed when he denies having anything to do with this (OK, I wouldn't believe him either), but when he's claiming to have nuclear weapons we take his word for it? What's less likely, an Islamic suicide attempt is conducted without this chap in a cave, or that this non-Governmental organisation has nukes? Occam's razor anyone.
Myself I think he's bluffing.
Any Islamic theologians out there (or anyone out there at all)? Would lying to a Muslim journalist qualify as lying to one of the Umma (bad) rather than lying to the ultimate audience, who are infidel (and so good).
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2001
(202)
-
▼
November
(43)
- An interesting question from an old copy of the Ne...
- And yet another one rolls in. I think that it sta...
- Some questions on this "prison riot" in Mazar-e-Sh...
- This is from a proud son of Dixie: Aw quit compla...
- This particularly worrying piece came in today: W...
- Afghan FAQs 1. What are the Afghan FAQ’s and why ...
- Anyone heard anything on the story in Pravda: AME...
- Oh no, not more bloody feedback on last week's art...
- Before you say it, no my last column is not wrong ...
- Some late feedback, first on the other feedback: ...
- A late addition from "Republican Catholic and Par...
- Responses. This is a fairly centralised point for...
- The rational debate continues: Came across your w...
- The responses keep coming. First a question, who ...
- A late addition. Is this what NORAID say behind c...
- Response I'm not sure why, but I've got a flurry ...
- Some feedback on my last article: Your artical ha...
- Information gratefully received My mailing list h...
- For more on the dangers of Pakistan going nuclear,...
- On some previous questions on Iain Duncan Smith th...
- So they've taken Kabul and all's right with the wo...
- If bemoaning moral and cultural decay is your thin...
- I'm not an Anglosphericist, and I don't think I've...
- Jonah Goldberg says our loyalty to America is "pee...
- And another thing. According to The Telegraph, Bi...
- So Osama did it all along, according to the Telegr...
- Has Romano Prodi finally gone mad? You be the judge.
- Has anyone noticed an, ahem, hostility from the BB...
- Another piece that's a bit late on here is this fr...
- An old but interesting piece in The Spectator by J...
- Does it still seem convincing? 10 Downing Street ...
- Anthony Howard's piece in Times is headed The Gove...
- Question Does anyone know how Iain Duncan-Smith k...
- How to work my links I have changed the way the l...
- What price for Poor David's survival? Poor David ...
- Discussion Groups Here's some of my favourite gro...
- Odds and ends Some Links I kept on meaning to pos...
- These are the MPs who spoke out against the bombin...
- Poor David Trimble has been saved! Hurrah for the...
- Historical Document's speech Blair's speech to th...
- Doublethink Some classic doublethink from the Com...
- Looks like poor David Trimble is about to be chuck...
- Two new web logs, one by Natalie Solent, which sho...
-
▼
November
(43)
0 comments:
Post a Comment