Tuesday, April 08, 2003
10:41 pm
UNresolved? - 8th April 2003, 22.40
Tonight, Blair and Bush have finished their deliberations over the current progress of the Iraqi war. The press release issued after their conference in Northern Ireland demonstrated that previous reports of division between the two over the role of the United Nations in a postwar Iraq have been resolved. The two leaders, following the customary preamble of thanks and secularised prayers, announced the creation of an Interim Authority in Iraq, supported by coalition forces, that would oversee the transition to democracy. This would be broad-based and representative of all religious and tribal groups but no timetable has been set as yet for elections (and at this point in time, one would not expect such a timetable).
The Interim Authority would work in consultation with the United Nations organisations, non governmental organisations and a Special Adviser appointed by the UN Secretary General. The US/UK would also seek:"the adoption of new United Nations Security Council Resolutions that would affirm Iraq's territorial integrity, ensure rapid delivery of humanitarian relief and endorse an appropriate post-conflict administration for Iraq.". These three separate resolutions may be initiated together or separately.
The compromise reached between the two leaders is quite clever. How can members of the United Nations Security Council vote against or veto resolutions confirming Iraq's integrity and need for humanitarian aid? Such resolutions will provide a role for the United Nations and its specialised agencies that will complement the role of USAID and the Ministry for International Development within Iraq. Once these have been set up, the US/UK may seek the endorsement of the United Nations for the Interim Authority that they have established themselves, but such a resolution may be sought immediately before the elections that take place when the body has reached the end of its natural life, years away from the present. The resolution will be an ex post facto ratification of the Authority - following the precedents laid down in Kosovo and Sierre Leone. Blair can live with that.
If they seek all three resolutions immediately, in order to shore up domestic criticism of Blair, it becomes interesting...
Tonight, Blair and Bush have finished their deliberations over the current progress of the Iraqi war. The press release issued after their conference in Northern Ireland demonstrated that previous reports of division between the two over the role of the United Nations in a postwar Iraq have been resolved. The two leaders, following the customary preamble of thanks and secularised prayers, announced the creation of an Interim Authority in Iraq, supported by coalition forces, that would oversee the transition to democracy. This would be broad-based and representative of all religious and tribal groups but no timetable has been set as yet for elections (and at this point in time, one would not expect such a timetable).
The Interim Authority would work in consultation with the United Nations organisations, non governmental organisations and a Special Adviser appointed by the UN Secretary General. The US/UK would also seek:"the adoption of new United Nations Security Council Resolutions that would affirm Iraq's territorial integrity, ensure rapid delivery of humanitarian relief and endorse an appropriate post-conflict administration for Iraq.". These three separate resolutions may be initiated together or separately.
The compromise reached between the two leaders is quite clever. How can members of the United Nations Security Council vote against or veto resolutions confirming Iraq's integrity and need for humanitarian aid? Such resolutions will provide a role for the United Nations and its specialised agencies that will complement the role of USAID and the Ministry for International Development within Iraq. Once these have been set up, the US/UK may seek the endorsement of the United Nations for the Interim Authority that they have established themselves, but such a resolution may be sought immediately before the elections that take place when the body has reached the end of its natural life, years away from the present. The resolution will be an ex post facto ratification of the Authority - following the precedents laid down in Kosovo and Sierre Leone. Blair can live with that.
If they seek all three resolutions immediately, in order to shore up domestic criticism of Blair, it becomes interesting...
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
April
(66)
- Diminished - 30th April 2003, 23.50 Sixty years a...
- The Plotter Thickens Matthew D'Ancona writes on C...
- Britain in Iraq - 27th April 2003, 18.20 Given th...
- Putting the puzzle together - 27th April 2003, 17....
- Let us have our say - 27th April 2003, 15.42 Paul...
- What happened in the Convention - 27th April 2003,...
- Paris-US rift - 24th April 2003, 23.00 To reitera...
- What future for the Common Foreign and Security Po...
- News from the Convention - 24th April 2003, 22.17 ...
- George the Dragon Tomorrow being St. George's day...
- A Succinct Precis of Franco-German Contradictions ...
- Wordsmithing - 21st April 2003, 20.32 Perhaps the...
- Biased Biased BBC? The Biased BBC blog has been g...
- The issue of Iraqi sanctions - 20th April 2003, 18...
- Zimwatch: Send for the Troops Alasdair Palmer wri...
- Staying on, and on According to the Telegraph: ...
- So Easy - 20th April 2003, 13.55 It is always a p...
- After Empire Theodore Dalrymple writes a depressi...
- Cheering Crowds One of the most facile of the pro...
- The world's most powerful Trots While talking abo...
- Why National Sovereignty trumps Human Rights Harr...
- Mandarins against the Special Relationship Prospe...
- Divisions on European Defence - 20th April 2003, 2...
- Neville Chamberlain, Appeasement and the British R...
- Is it all just Wilsonian? John Ikenberry's articl...
- Clear as mud Well I think I know why generally le...
- Zimwatch: It can get worse, now the world's starti...
- EU asked for it So we have the formal acceptance ...
- The Fallen - 15th April 2003, 22.46 Some deaths i...
- Unriven There's too many sunny optimists out ther...
- Gabbing We have a new contributor. Dr Sean Gabb,...
- Irrational? 15th April 2003. Has anybody else ha...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 101 Monday, 14 A...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 101 Monday, 14 A...
- Iraq: A spur to European integration - 14th April ...
- Missile Defence: Costs and Benefits to the UK - 14...
- Hungary votes yes - 13th April 2003, 22.22 On a l...
- Those cheering crowds, ctd The picture below come...
- Does the British Government support looting? This...
- The St Petersburg Trio - 12th April 2003, 16.48 C...
- ... or you're with the terrorists So Britain is n...
- Even Governments Lie The lack of weapons of mass ...
- What our rulers think One of those Things I Mean ...
- Damn - 10th April 2003, 22.07 One of the possible...
- The "Reckoning" - 10th April 2003, 21.35 Jack Str...
- Can we go home now? Now that Baghdad is under Ame...
- UNresolved? - 8th April 2003, 22.40 Tonight, Blai...
- Defining Quagmire So what's this worry about quag...
- Further developments in European Defence - 7th Mar...
- The Hungarian Referendum - 7th April 2003, 20.13 ...
- Zimwatch: Spot the difference In South Africa the...
- Understanding Blair (Revisited) - 6th April 2003, ...
- New Forum For those of you who want to have a gen...
- The penny drops: Links update - 6th April 2003, 15...
- Reclaim the Bases - 6th April 2003, 0.26 When doe...
- Was Private Eye the first blog? Discuss This is a...
- Blackwell's Charge - 5th April 2003, 23.27 Lord B...
- Anyone out there who can explain this Maybe my br...
- Losing friends over the war? Here's a way to make...
- Euforia - 4th April 2003, 23.25 Just as a follow ...
- The penny drops - 4th April 2003, 22.55 If you re...
- Zimwatch: Almost official Not much to report apa...
- Now I'm pro-war Welcome to all the Political Scie...
- Trapped by their publics - 1st April 2003, 22.40 ...
- Zimwatch: A deadline passes So the deadline has ...
- More of the same As if to show what's in store fo...
-
▼
April
(66)
0 comments:
Post a Comment