Friday, April 04, 2003
10:55 pm
The penny drops - 4th April 2003, 22.55
If you read David Heathcote-Amory in EUObserver, it is clear that the Conservatives are still not addressing the issue. Heathcote-Amory identifies all of the undemocratic shortcomings within the draft constitution but stays within the expedient boundaries that the Tories set for themselves over the issue of Europe in order not to appear divisive to the public. However, this undermines the purpose of the piece since the Tories are unable to provide any course of action or spell out alternatives if Britain does not sign up to the Constitution.
If the European Convention continues down this route we risk disaster. May the rethink on the Common Foreign and Security Policy lead to a wider review of how to discharge the mandate given to us. Otherwise we will continue to build a Politicians' Europe, not a People's Europe.
What he does not say is more important than what he does. It is an omission that has prevented any political party or movement debating the implications of the European Convention for the United Kingdom. However, Samizdata (apart from David Carr) has noticed the continual development of integration in the Convention and the implementation of Eufor and seem to be surprised that bureaucrats continue with their schemes through crisis and war, although not for long.
But, Gabriel Syme should not despair. There are signs of hope and flexibility, even in the nonsense emanating from the Convention. Lord Howell contributed a long interview to the BBC condemning the Franco-German approach and called for a poll on the Constitution. The idea of a European wide referendum has been backed by the members of the Convention itself where almost half (50 ou of 105) back the proposal.
This is probably the most hopeful route yet reported for halting Britain's integration into Europe. Even if it is held across the EU and on a non-binding basis, it would be difficult for a British government to lose a referendum on our territory and accept an EU wide result. It would also be difficult for Britain to 'opt out' of such a proposal if all other EU members were participating. So, there is a development in the Convention that can be supported.
Although there have been reports of slippage in the convention's timescale, the Helsingen Sanomat is reporting that the Convention's report will be assessed in three months and that the intergovernmental conference will commence in September, with agreement achieved by the end of the year.
Now is the time for the Conservative party and all of the little platoons to make a concerted effort and support a referendum on the proposed European Constitution.
If you read David Heathcote-Amory in EUObserver, it is clear that the Conservatives are still not addressing the issue. Heathcote-Amory identifies all of the undemocratic shortcomings within the draft constitution but stays within the expedient boundaries that the Tories set for themselves over the issue of Europe in order not to appear divisive to the public. However, this undermines the purpose of the piece since the Tories are unable to provide any course of action or spell out alternatives if Britain does not sign up to the Constitution.
If the European Convention continues down this route we risk disaster. May the rethink on the Common Foreign and Security Policy lead to a wider review of how to discharge the mandate given to us. Otherwise we will continue to build a Politicians' Europe, not a People's Europe.
What he does not say is more important than what he does. It is an omission that has prevented any political party or movement debating the implications of the European Convention for the United Kingdom. However, Samizdata (apart from David Carr) has noticed the continual development of integration in the Convention and the implementation of Eufor and seem to be surprised that bureaucrats continue with their schemes through crisis and war, although not for long.
But, Gabriel Syme should not despair. There are signs of hope and flexibility, even in the nonsense emanating from the Convention. Lord Howell contributed a long interview to the BBC condemning the Franco-German approach and called for a poll on the Constitution. The idea of a European wide referendum has been backed by the members of the Convention itself where almost half (50 ou of 105) back the proposal.
This is probably the most hopeful route yet reported for halting Britain's integration into Europe. Even if it is held across the EU and on a non-binding basis, it would be difficult for a British government to lose a referendum on our territory and accept an EU wide result. It would also be difficult for Britain to 'opt out' of such a proposal if all other EU members were participating. So, there is a development in the Convention that can be supported.
Although there have been reports of slippage in the convention's timescale, the Helsingen Sanomat is reporting that the Convention's report will be assessed in three months and that the intergovernmental conference will commence in September, with agreement achieved by the end of the year.
Now is the time for the Conservative party and all of the little platoons to make a concerted effort and support a referendum on the proposed European Constitution.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
April
(66)
- Diminished - 30th April 2003, 23.50 Sixty years a...
- The Plotter Thickens Matthew D'Ancona writes on C...
- Britain in Iraq - 27th April 2003, 18.20 Given th...
- Putting the puzzle together - 27th April 2003, 17....
- Let us have our say - 27th April 2003, 15.42 Paul...
- What happened in the Convention - 27th April 2003,...
- Paris-US rift - 24th April 2003, 23.00 To reitera...
- What future for the Common Foreign and Security Po...
- News from the Convention - 24th April 2003, 22.17 ...
- George the Dragon Tomorrow being St. George's day...
- A Succinct Precis of Franco-German Contradictions ...
- Wordsmithing - 21st April 2003, 20.32 Perhaps the...
- Biased Biased BBC? The Biased BBC blog has been g...
- The issue of Iraqi sanctions - 20th April 2003, 18...
- Zimwatch: Send for the Troops Alasdair Palmer wri...
- Staying on, and on According to the Telegraph: ...
- So Easy - 20th April 2003, 13.55 It is always a p...
- After Empire Theodore Dalrymple writes a depressi...
- Cheering Crowds One of the most facile of the pro...
- The world's most powerful Trots While talking abo...
- Why National Sovereignty trumps Human Rights Harr...
- Mandarins against the Special Relationship Prospe...
- Divisions on European Defence - 20th April 2003, 2...
- Neville Chamberlain, Appeasement and the British R...
- Is it all just Wilsonian? John Ikenberry's articl...
- Clear as mud Well I think I know why generally le...
- Zimwatch: It can get worse, now the world's starti...
- EU asked for it So we have the formal acceptance ...
- The Fallen - 15th April 2003, 22.46 Some deaths i...
- Unriven There's too many sunny optimists out ther...
- Gabbing We have a new contributor. Dr Sean Gabb,...
- Irrational? 15th April 2003. Has anybody else ha...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 101 Monday, 14 A...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 101 Monday, 14 A...
- Iraq: A spur to European integration - 14th April ...
- Missile Defence: Costs and Benefits to the UK - 14...
- Hungary votes yes - 13th April 2003, 22.22 On a l...
- Those cheering crowds, ctd The picture below come...
- Does the British Government support looting? This...
- The St Petersburg Trio - 12th April 2003, 16.48 C...
- ... or you're with the terrorists So Britain is n...
- Even Governments Lie The lack of weapons of mass ...
- What our rulers think One of those Things I Mean ...
- Damn - 10th April 2003, 22.07 One of the possible...
- The "Reckoning" - 10th April 2003, 21.35 Jack Str...
- Can we go home now? Now that Baghdad is under Ame...
- UNresolved? - 8th April 2003, 22.40 Tonight, Blai...
- Defining Quagmire So what's this worry about quag...
- Further developments in European Defence - 7th Mar...
- The Hungarian Referendum - 7th April 2003, 20.13 ...
- Zimwatch: Spot the difference In South Africa the...
- Understanding Blair (Revisited) - 6th April 2003, ...
- New Forum For those of you who want to have a gen...
- The penny drops: Links update - 6th April 2003, 15...
- Reclaim the Bases - 6th April 2003, 0.26 When doe...
- Was Private Eye the first blog? Discuss This is a...
- Blackwell's Charge - 5th April 2003, 23.27 Lord B...
- Anyone out there who can explain this Maybe my br...
- Losing friends over the war? Here's a way to make...
- Euforia - 4th April 2003, 23.25 Just as a follow ...
- The penny drops - 4th April 2003, 22.55 If you re...
- Zimwatch: Almost official Not much to report apa...
- Now I'm pro-war Welcome to all the Political Scie...
- Trapped by their publics - 1st April 2003, 22.40 ...
- Zimwatch: A deadline passes So the deadline has ...
- More of the same As if to show what's in store fo...
-
▼
April
(66)
0 comments:
Post a Comment