Thursday, September 18, 2003
9:26 pm
Wat Tyler's Organisation - 18th September 2003, 21.24
The failure of the World Trade Organisation talks at Cancun was unsurprising. The developing countries called for the reduction of tariffs and subsidies on agricultural goods in the EU/USA but failed to see that the same advantages would accrue even faster if their own levies were also abolished. The European Union suffered the greatest failure of all since its attempt to undermine the core competence of the WTO with environmental and social assessments proved too bitter a pill for any country to swallow. Eco-protectionism did not have the strength to dominate the multilateral trading system.
In his initial assessment of the failure at Cancun, Pascal Levy stated that the European Union would look towards bilateral and regional trade deals as the current round of trade talks had reached an impasse. This was a standard position of most of the participants. However, like the United States, the EU is now assessing whether the current structure of the WTO accurately reflects their interests. The United States wishes to reform voting to reflect the trading strengths of individual members and we can assume that the EU would wish to include environmental and social criteria in any changes to the WTO's mission.
The rich countries get a bloody nose and, instead of defending the free trade that has enriched their countries, prefer to fix the rules of the game again so that the peasants don't talk back.
The failure of the World Trade Organisation talks at Cancun was unsurprising. The developing countries called for the reduction of tariffs and subsidies on agricultural goods in the EU/USA but failed to see that the same advantages would accrue even faster if their own levies were also abolished. The European Union suffered the greatest failure of all since its attempt to undermine the core competence of the WTO with environmental and social assessments proved too bitter a pill for any country to swallow. Eco-protectionism did not have the strength to dominate the multilateral trading system.
In his initial assessment of the failure at Cancun, Pascal Levy stated that the European Union would look towards bilateral and regional trade deals as the current round of trade talks had reached an impasse. This was a standard position of most of the participants. However, like the United States, the EU is now assessing whether the current structure of the WTO accurately reflects their interests. The United States wishes to reform voting to reflect the trading strengths of individual members and we can assume that the EU would wish to include environmental and social criteria in any changes to the WTO's mission.
The rich countries get a bloody nose and, instead of defending the free trade that has enriched their countries, prefer to fix the rules of the game again so that the peasants don't talk back.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
September
(45)
- Soldiers have a right to life One of the more di...
- Job Done: A Tory Endgame for Iraq In the Guardian...
- East Of Suez One of our remaining commitments is ...
- Britain accepts PKK as a terrorist organisation, a...
- IGC: Stormclouds Looming The forthcoming intergov...
- Private Widdle Speaks It appears that the Chief o...
- Pocket Battleships An extremely good article fro...
- Galileo: A Commercial Rival to GPS The satellite ...
- The Politics of Incoherence
- The Beeb's pro-war bias I always thought that it ...
- The Telegraph had an interesting article on Hitler...
- The great question From the left wing blog Nobo...
- Further detail on the defence concessions that Bla...
- Blair has shown that he is still trying to walk th...
- Placemen, Puppets and Toadies The reform of the ...
- The Latvians have voted "Yes" in the final enlarge...
- Visit The Foreign Office - 20th September 2003, U...
- Biased Brent Coverage Cut into jerry built studio...
- Wat Tyler's Organisation - 18th September 2003, 21...
- Prodi's Pronouncement - 18th September 2003, 21.00...
- We Want Space and We Won't Wait China to launch i...
- Overreaching - 16th September 2003, 23.03 With th...
- Zimwatch: Closing the presses One question that ...
- Assassination: Politics by other means? The assas...
- 112 Gripes about the French - 14th September 2003,...
- Waving the Veto - 14th September 2003, 11.23 Brit...
- Forum Europe - 12th September 2003, 15.55 What ar...
- Remember, Remember the 11th September - 11th Septe...
- A Trend? - 11th September 2003, 22.29 In the Prim...
- Martyr for the Yes Vote It won't win me a prize f...
- REQUIRED URJENT ASSISTANCE DEAR SIR / MADAM, I A...
- Adam died on a Zebra Crossing - 9th September 2003...
- Euroluvvies - 7th September 2003, 20.38 We are al...
- Sweden's Euro 2003 Qualifier - 7th September 2003,...
- Oi, Nutter Michael Meacher hasn't seen a cause th...
- On:Message, Repeat, Ad Infinitum - 5th September 2...
- PRESS RELEASE FROM THE CENTRE FOR THE NEW EUROPE h...
- One Opens, Another Closes - 3rd September 2003, 22...
- Hutton: The Pit and the Pendulum - 3rd September 2...
- The 'Internationalisation' of the Iraqi Conflict -...
- Second XV limber up for Convention rematch - 2nd S...
- Now Brussels wants homeowners to pay tribute Mort...
- Autumnal reading There are three columns worth re...
- Navigating Division - 1st September 2003, 22.20 D...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 111 Monday, 1st ...
-
▼
September
(45)
0 comments:
Post a Comment