Wednesday, September 03, 2003
10:18 pm
The 'Internationalisation' of the Iraqi Conflict - 3rd September 2003, 22.12
The United States has found that its ability to construct 'coalitions of the willing' outside of the legitimating structure of the United Nations has been found wanting. This presents a real constraint on the United States' ability to act outside of the UN Security Council in military actions that demand a long-term commitment to reform and nation building following an invasion and occupation. Since the two cases involved are Iraq and Afghanistan, those who would crow over a perceived reversal of US power should view this as a particular, rather than a general, example.
The United States has tried to enforce security within Iraq using the same number of soldiers that prosecuted the war. Yet, it is clear in debate and action that the US military is seriously overstretched. Powell and Bush have no compunction about 'internationalising' the Iraqi occupation under US command, if it reduces the number of US soldiers killed and allows a graceful withdrawal of some forces. However, if France holds out for complete UN control and threatens a veto, the Bush administration can then blame a former ally for jeopardising improvement in Iraqi security to its domestic audience.
Colin Powell will be introducing a UN resolution on this matter in the next few days. Of course, if US overstretch is so clear, one wonders how we are coping, although we are not having a debate on how few soldiers we have.
The United States has found that its ability to construct 'coalitions of the willing' outside of the legitimating structure of the United Nations has been found wanting. This presents a real constraint on the United States' ability to act outside of the UN Security Council in military actions that demand a long-term commitment to reform and nation building following an invasion and occupation. Since the two cases involved are Iraq and Afghanistan, those who would crow over a perceived reversal of US power should view this as a particular, rather than a general, example.
The United States has tried to enforce security within Iraq using the same number of soldiers that prosecuted the war. Yet, it is clear in debate and action that the US military is seriously overstretched. Powell and Bush have no compunction about 'internationalising' the Iraqi occupation under US command, if it reduces the number of US soldiers killed and allows a graceful withdrawal of some forces. However, if France holds out for complete UN control and threatens a veto, the Bush administration can then blame a former ally for jeopardising improvement in Iraqi security to its domestic audience.
Colin Powell will be introducing a UN resolution on this matter in the next few days. Of course, if US overstretch is so clear, one wonders how we are coping, although we are not having a debate on how few soldiers we have.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
September
(45)
- Soldiers have a right to life One of the more di...
- Job Done: A Tory Endgame for Iraq In the Guardian...
- East Of Suez One of our remaining commitments is ...
- Britain accepts PKK as a terrorist organisation, a...
- IGC: Stormclouds Looming The forthcoming intergov...
- Private Widdle Speaks It appears that the Chief o...
- Pocket Battleships An extremely good article fro...
- Galileo: A Commercial Rival to GPS The satellite ...
- The Politics of Incoherence
- The Beeb's pro-war bias I always thought that it ...
- The Telegraph had an interesting article on Hitler...
- The great question From the left wing blog Nobo...
- Further detail on the defence concessions that Bla...
- Blair has shown that he is still trying to walk th...
- Placemen, Puppets and Toadies The reform of the ...
- The Latvians have voted "Yes" in the final enlarge...
- Visit The Foreign Office - 20th September 2003, U...
- Biased Brent Coverage Cut into jerry built studio...
- Wat Tyler's Organisation - 18th September 2003, 21...
- Prodi's Pronouncement - 18th September 2003, 21.00...
- We Want Space and We Won't Wait China to launch i...
- Overreaching - 16th September 2003, 23.03 With th...
- Zimwatch: Closing the presses One question that ...
- Assassination: Politics by other means? The assas...
- 112 Gripes about the French - 14th September 2003,...
- Waving the Veto - 14th September 2003, 11.23 Brit...
- Forum Europe - 12th September 2003, 15.55 What ar...
- Remember, Remember the 11th September - 11th Septe...
- A Trend? - 11th September 2003, 22.29 In the Prim...
- Martyr for the Yes Vote It won't win me a prize f...
- REQUIRED URJENT ASSISTANCE DEAR SIR / MADAM, I A...
- Adam died on a Zebra Crossing - 9th September 2003...
- Euroluvvies - 7th September 2003, 20.38 We are al...
- Sweden's Euro 2003 Qualifier - 7th September 2003,...
- Oi, Nutter Michael Meacher hasn't seen a cause th...
- On:Message, Repeat, Ad Infinitum - 5th September 2...
- PRESS RELEASE FROM THE CENTRE FOR THE NEW EUROPE h...
- One Opens, Another Closes - 3rd September 2003, 22...
- Hutton: The Pit and the Pendulum - 3rd September 2...
- The 'Internationalisation' of the Iraqi Conflict -...
- Second XV limber up for Convention rematch - 2nd S...
- Now Brussels wants homeowners to pay tribute Mort...
- Autumnal reading There are three columns worth re...
- Navigating Division - 1st September 2003, 22.20 D...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 111 Monday, 1st ...
-
▼
September
(45)
0 comments:
Post a Comment