Friday, September 05, 2003
11:19 pm
On:Message, Repeat, Ad Infinitum - 5th September 2003, 23.13
It is clear that many politicians follow the philosophy of repetition. If you repeat your message countless times, your audience will eventually accept and acquiesce. The latest incarnation of this philosophy has become a thread in European political announcements this summer as the supporters of the European Convention defend their achievement, the draft of the European Constitution. Giscard D'Estaing is one of the most vocal defenders understandably and his latest claim is that,
Europe's citizens will reject a draft EU constitution if their leaders water it down in the coming months, the document's chief author, Valery Giscard d'Estaing, told the European parliament Wednesday.
He even claimed that these changes could "detract" from the Constitution's "brevity". In his speech to the European Parliament, D'Estaing did note that the intergovernmental conference would operate under time constraints and the "need for unanimity"; pressures that could prevent countries wishing to dissent from the grand projet.
However, Romano Prodi was already bidding to reduce the intergovernmental component within this process and strengthen the hand of the Commission. His latest proposals have suggested that the areas of unanimity required to construct EU policy should be reduced; that the national veto should be removed for indirect and corporate taxation; that Member States' budgets should be 'coordinated'; and that external relations for the EU should remove duplication (a reference to individual embassies and ambassadors, perhaps?).
D'Estaing did identify the one area where the European political class cannot control this process. That area is the ratification of the Constitution through referenda held in Member States. Both the Dutch and the Portuguese have indicated recently in polls that they favour a vote on the Constitution. This process is encouraging since public opinion has turned away from European integration as problems of immigration, economic decline and terrorism have come to the fore. Do the political classes believe that voters will accept the Constitution because the 'benefits' of European integration are self-evident and an affirmative vote will follow once the arguments are publicised?
Let us hope that this Bonapartist technocracy is about to receive a bloody nose!
It is clear that many politicians follow the philosophy of repetition. If you repeat your message countless times, your audience will eventually accept and acquiesce. The latest incarnation of this philosophy has become a thread in European political announcements this summer as the supporters of the European Convention defend their achievement, the draft of the European Constitution. Giscard D'Estaing is one of the most vocal defenders understandably and his latest claim is that,
Europe's citizens will reject a draft EU constitution if their leaders water it down in the coming months, the document's chief author, Valery Giscard d'Estaing, told the European parliament Wednesday.
He even claimed that these changes could "detract" from the Constitution's "brevity". In his speech to the European Parliament, D'Estaing did note that the intergovernmental conference would operate under time constraints and the "need for unanimity"; pressures that could prevent countries wishing to dissent from the grand projet.
However, Romano Prodi was already bidding to reduce the intergovernmental component within this process and strengthen the hand of the Commission. His latest proposals have suggested that the areas of unanimity required to construct EU policy should be reduced; that the national veto should be removed for indirect and corporate taxation; that Member States' budgets should be 'coordinated'; and that external relations for the EU should remove duplication (a reference to individual embassies and ambassadors, perhaps?).
D'Estaing did identify the one area where the European political class cannot control this process. That area is the ratification of the Constitution through referenda held in Member States. Both the Dutch and the Portuguese have indicated recently in polls that they favour a vote on the Constitution. This process is encouraging since public opinion has turned away from European integration as problems of immigration, economic decline and terrorism have come to the fore. Do the political classes believe that voters will accept the Constitution because the 'benefits' of European integration are self-evident and an affirmative vote will follow once the arguments are publicised?
Let us hope that this Bonapartist technocracy is about to receive a bloody nose!
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
September
(45)
- Soldiers have a right to life One of the more di...
- Job Done: A Tory Endgame for Iraq In the Guardian...
- East Of Suez One of our remaining commitments is ...
- Britain accepts PKK as a terrorist organisation, a...
- IGC: Stormclouds Looming The forthcoming intergov...
- Private Widdle Speaks It appears that the Chief o...
- Pocket Battleships An extremely good article fro...
- Galileo: A Commercial Rival to GPS The satellite ...
- The Politics of Incoherence
- The Beeb's pro-war bias I always thought that it ...
- The Telegraph had an interesting article on Hitler...
- The great question From the left wing blog Nobo...
- Further detail on the defence concessions that Bla...
- Blair has shown that he is still trying to walk th...
- Placemen, Puppets and Toadies The reform of the ...
- The Latvians have voted "Yes" in the final enlarge...
- Visit The Foreign Office - 20th September 2003, U...
- Biased Brent Coverage Cut into jerry built studio...
- Wat Tyler's Organisation - 18th September 2003, 21...
- Prodi's Pronouncement - 18th September 2003, 21.00...
- We Want Space and We Won't Wait China to launch i...
- Overreaching - 16th September 2003, 23.03 With th...
- Zimwatch: Closing the presses One question that ...
- Assassination: Politics by other means? The assas...
- 112 Gripes about the French - 14th September 2003,...
- Waving the Veto - 14th September 2003, 11.23 Brit...
- Forum Europe - 12th September 2003, 15.55 What ar...
- Remember, Remember the 11th September - 11th Septe...
- A Trend? - 11th September 2003, 22.29 In the Prim...
- Martyr for the Yes Vote It won't win me a prize f...
- REQUIRED URJENT ASSISTANCE DEAR SIR / MADAM, I A...
- Adam died on a Zebra Crossing - 9th September 2003...
- Euroluvvies - 7th September 2003, 20.38 We are al...
- Sweden's Euro 2003 Qualifier - 7th September 2003,...
- Oi, Nutter Michael Meacher hasn't seen a cause th...
- On:Message, Repeat, Ad Infinitum - 5th September 2...
- PRESS RELEASE FROM THE CENTRE FOR THE NEW EUROPE h...
- One Opens, Another Closes - 3rd September 2003, 22...
- Hutton: The Pit and the Pendulum - 3rd September 2...
- The 'Internationalisation' of the Iraqi Conflict -...
- Second XV limber up for Convention rematch - 2nd S...
- Now Brussels wants homeowners to pay tribute Mort...
- Autumnal reading There are three columns worth re...
- Navigating Division - 1st September 2003, 22.20 D...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 111 Monday, 1st ...
-
▼
September
(45)
0 comments:
Post a Comment