Monday, June 30, 2003
10:15 pm
Global Monitoring for the Environment and Security - 30th June 2003, 22.12
This is the system known as GMES, designed to provide the European Union with an independent system that would provide the Continent with greater security. In the meeting held in Athens on the 8th and 9th May 2003, Greek Defence Minister, Yiannis Papantoniou declared that the war in Iraq had spurred those who wished to unify European security policies.
"Recent events in Iraq have highlighted the importance of being able to protect our own interests. Europe must commit to a more united approach to defence and we must support closer ties between defence and industry. Space is the fourth domain in defence, multiplying our power at every other level - on land, at sea and in the air."
This fits with the calls from the European Convention for a common defence and security policy that would involve a European Agency for Armament and Strategic Research whose remit would include construction of a space based defence. The supporters of this policy include Greece, France, Germany, Belgium, Spain and Italy. The smaller they are, the louder their voice...
As Lt Colonel Alexandros Kolovos, Head of the National Centre for Space Applications at the Greek Ministry of Defence, explained, Greece has been among the loudest voices calling for the inclusion of defence aspects within the European Space Policy.
This policy has been advanced by Star21, the Aerospace Advisory Group for the European Commission. Taking note of the aerospace companies presented at this meeting demonstrates that the Nordic countries and especially Britain were not represented. The omission of BAe is very noticeable.
The industrial community, represented by speakers from Eurospace , Alcatel , Astrium , OHB Systems , Alenia Spazio and Thales , agreed that the European space industry is up to the challenge of meeting Europe's space defence requirements, including the production and operation of advanced military satellites systems.
Where does GMES fit into all this?
The GMES initiative aims to implement an integrated European approach for the collection, dissemination and analysis of space information and to co-ordinate the structures of the systems which produce space information.
The website focuses on the environmental benefits of this integrated system but, as the above meeting demonstrates, the security aspect is given more emphasis in politics than in public. Can we believe that this system is just designed to help farmers plan ahead in wartime?
Finally, GMES will make a fundamental contribution to the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) to which the EU is now clearly committed. The space tool is today essential to peacekeeping missions, such as the Union's commitment in Kosovo. In 1999, for example, an observation satellite system developed by the Commission's Joint Research Centre made it possible for the ECHO humanitarian aid agency to evaluate the impact of military operations on regional agricultural production.
Their agenda is very clear, and gratefully, the British military-industrial complex does not appear to have signed up.
This is the system known as GMES, designed to provide the European Union with an independent system that would provide the Continent with greater security. In the meeting held in Athens on the 8th and 9th May 2003, Greek Defence Minister, Yiannis Papantoniou declared that the war in Iraq had spurred those who wished to unify European security policies.
"Recent events in Iraq have highlighted the importance of being able to protect our own interests. Europe must commit to a more united approach to defence and we must support closer ties between defence and industry. Space is the fourth domain in defence, multiplying our power at every other level - on land, at sea and in the air."
This fits with the calls from the European Convention for a common defence and security policy that would involve a European Agency for Armament and Strategic Research whose remit would include construction of a space based defence. The supporters of this policy include Greece, France, Germany, Belgium, Spain and Italy. The smaller they are, the louder their voice...
As Lt Colonel Alexandros Kolovos, Head of the National Centre for Space Applications at the Greek Ministry of Defence, explained, Greece has been among the loudest voices calling for the inclusion of defence aspects within the European Space Policy.
This policy has been advanced by Star21, the Aerospace Advisory Group for the European Commission. Taking note of the aerospace companies presented at this meeting demonstrates that the Nordic countries and especially Britain were not represented. The omission of BAe is very noticeable.
The industrial community, represented by speakers from Eurospace , Alcatel , Astrium , OHB Systems , Alenia Spazio and Thales , agreed that the European space industry is up to the challenge of meeting Europe's space defence requirements, including the production and operation of advanced military satellites systems.
Where does GMES fit into all this?
The GMES initiative aims to implement an integrated European approach for the collection, dissemination and analysis of space information and to co-ordinate the structures of the systems which produce space information.
The website focuses on the environmental benefits of this integrated system but, as the above meeting demonstrates, the security aspect is given more emphasis in politics than in public. Can we believe that this system is just designed to help farmers plan ahead in wartime?
Finally, GMES will make a fundamental contribution to the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) to which the EU is now clearly committed. The space tool is today essential to peacekeeping missions, such as the Union's commitment in Kosovo. In 1999, for example, an observation satellite system developed by the Commission's Joint Research Centre made it possible for the ECHO humanitarian aid agency to evaluate the impact of military operations on regional agricultural production.
Their agenda is very clear, and gratefully, the British military-industrial complex does not appear to have signed up.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
June
(50)
- Basra: Just Another Manic Monday - 30th June 2003,...
- Global Monitoring for the Environment and Security...
- The Sin of Omission - 29th June 2003, 17.13 The u...
- A World Peacekeeping Force - 29th June 2003, 11.46...
- I do not remember the BBC being biased against the...
- Mini Me's Foreign Policy - 28th June 2003, 20.48 ...
- From Red to Green: The Common Agricultural Policy ...
- Our Reward Six more British troops die at the han...
- Cato on the Withholding Tax - 25th June 2003, 23.3...
- Ten Pence for a cup of Tea Is there any kind soul...
- Delian Delights John Laughland says that NATO is ...
- State Funding for Political Parties - 24th June 20...
- An Unequal Partnership - 23rd June 2003, 22.59 Th...
- A Common Policy on Space - 23rd June 2003, 22.49 ...
- Thanksgiving - 23rd June 2003, 22.41 One of the e...
- Catch the Pigeon - 22nd June 2003, 20.04 Tony Bla...
- United Nations: Reform - 22nd June 2003, 17.28 A ...
- The Government's Position on the Euro - 22nd June ...
- Thessalonika - 19th June 2003, 23.23 The EU leade...
- Sanity Prevails - 19th June 2003, 23.07 It appear...
- Zimwatch: Blair and Bush will be tried as war crim...
- HMV - 18th June 2003, 23.26 Peter Mandelson write...
- A Consensus on North Korea - 18th June 2003, 23.01...
- Emotional Over Europe. 18th June 2003. I find it...
- Most Reliable European Ally - 16th June 2003, 23.1...
- Festering Perry de Haviland mentions this website...
- Basic Benevolence - 15th June 2003, 22.07 One of ...
- Missile Defence: A Secret Agreement - 15th June 20...
- How successful was the Daily Mail referendum? - 15...
- A Technical Oversight - 14th June 2003, 23.43 It ...
- The Publication of the Constitution - 14th June 20...
- Rapprochement - 12th June 2003, 22.38 Having warn...
- Paying the Price - 12th June 2003, 22.33 Belgium'...
- Matthew Barganier makes the point that the antiwar...
- The Press Conference - 11th June 2003, 22.35 In a...
- Have you voted yet? The Daily Mail's referendum i...
- Best of the Blogs I've been avoiding other blogs ...
- Welcoming Party The Tory MEP Dan Hannan writes "S...
- Freedom ain't Free The Chronicles web-log "Winds ...
- The Neville Chamberlain Fan Club Those of us who ...
- Support from those that count - 10th June 2003, 22...
- Will this be ready in forty five minutes as well? ...
- What do the Europhiles think? - 9th June 2003, 22....
- No News - 9th June 2003, 20.07 The announcement b...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 106 Thursday, 5 ...
- New York: The Intrepid - 6th June 2003 (I Think) ...
- Zimwatch: Still There Although it's getting hot i...
- Tony Ulbricht? Srdja Trifkovic thinks that Britai...
- Zimwatch: Kicking Off? Both myself and Mr Chaston...
- Will the Tories oppose the war now it's over? Mic...
-
▼
June
(50)
1 comments:
What an amazing book to read I was trying to find this but now I found it thanks to the author and who created this amazing super fast website hotmail
Post a Comment