Monday, June 23, 2003
10:52 pm
A Common Policy on Space - 23rd June 2003, 22.49
Here's an interesting article answering questions on the aims of European policy in space. Their major programmes are GALILEO, a satellite navigation system, and GMES, the Global Monitoring of Environment and Security Initiative. Both have a security dimension, detailed here:
What role does Space play in security and defence?
Space-based systems can respond to many emerging security needs, with both civilian and defence aspects encompassed under the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). The current action being undertaken by the EU's new Rapid Reaction Force in the Democratic Republic of Congo is a good example of a ground-based security operation being aided by strategic space technologies.
The EU/ESA Joint Task Force will look, inter alia, in the 'dual use' of space systems. GALILEO and GMES, for example, as civilian projects under civilian control, are seen as key to developing transport and environment policies. But they are also highly relevant to the CFSP, especially in reference to the Petersberg tasks, which include military missions involving humanitarian aid, evacuation, peacekeeping and crisis resolution. Space is dual by nature. We will pay an increasingly high price if we keep civil and military applications artificially separated.
Key space-based capabilities include monitoring and intelligence gathering, highly relevant when reacting to natural disasters, or in times of crisis. Space systems can also provide a robust communications infrastructure, capable of operating even when conventional means are disrupted.
The EU's CFSP will only be really credible if it is supported by an autonomous intelligence capability, which includes space assets. The European Advisory Group on Aerospace, made up of high-level personalities from the political and industrial world, has presented a document on the current situation in the aerospace field. This 'STAR 21' report, recommends that the Union develop a satellite-based defence and security capacity on a European scale.
Note that the Union wishes to develop a "satellite based defence and security capacity on a European scale". They wouldn't need to do that if they were just a common market.
Here's an interesting article answering questions on the aims of European policy in space. Their major programmes are GALILEO, a satellite navigation system, and GMES, the Global Monitoring of Environment and Security Initiative. Both have a security dimension, detailed here:
What role does Space play in security and defence?
Space-based systems can respond to many emerging security needs, with both civilian and defence aspects encompassed under the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). The current action being undertaken by the EU's new Rapid Reaction Force in the Democratic Republic of Congo is a good example of a ground-based security operation being aided by strategic space technologies.
The EU/ESA Joint Task Force will look, inter alia, in the 'dual use' of space systems. GALILEO and GMES, for example, as civilian projects under civilian control, are seen as key to developing transport and environment policies. But they are also highly relevant to the CFSP, especially in reference to the Petersberg tasks, which include military missions involving humanitarian aid, evacuation, peacekeeping and crisis resolution. Space is dual by nature. We will pay an increasingly high price if we keep civil and military applications artificially separated.
Key space-based capabilities include monitoring and intelligence gathering, highly relevant when reacting to natural disasters, or in times of crisis. Space systems can also provide a robust communications infrastructure, capable of operating even when conventional means are disrupted.
The EU's CFSP will only be really credible if it is supported by an autonomous intelligence capability, which includes space assets. The European Advisory Group on Aerospace, made up of high-level personalities from the political and industrial world, has presented a document on the current situation in the aerospace field. This 'STAR 21' report, recommends that the Union develop a satellite-based defence and security capacity on a European scale.
Note that the Union wishes to develop a "satellite based defence and security capacity on a European scale". They wouldn't need to do that if they were just a common market.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
June
(50)
- Basra: Just Another Manic Monday - 30th June 2003,...
- Global Monitoring for the Environment and Security...
- The Sin of Omission - 29th June 2003, 17.13 The u...
- A World Peacekeeping Force - 29th June 2003, 11.46...
- I do not remember the BBC being biased against the...
- Mini Me's Foreign Policy - 28th June 2003, 20.48 ...
- From Red to Green: The Common Agricultural Policy ...
- Our Reward Six more British troops die at the han...
- Cato on the Withholding Tax - 25th June 2003, 23.3...
- Ten Pence for a cup of Tea Is there any kind soul...
- Delian Delights John Laughland says that NATO is ...
- State Funding for Political Parties - 24th June 20...
- An Unequal Partnership - 23rd June 2003, 22.59 Th...
- A Common Policy on Space - 23rd June 2003, 22.49 ...
- Thanksgiving - 23rd June 2003, 22.41 One of the e...
- Catch the Pigeon - 22nd June 2003, 20.04 Tony Bla...
- United Nations: Reform - 22nd June 2003, 17.28 A ...
- The Government's Position on the Euro - 22nd June ...
- Thessalonika - 19th June 2003, 23.23 The EU leade...
- Sanity Prevails - 19th June 2003, 23.07 It appear...
- Zimwatch: Blair and Bush will be tried as war crim...
- HMV - 18th June 2003, 23.26 Peter Mandelson write...
- A Consensus on North Korea - 18th June 2003, 23.01...
- Emotional Over Europe. 18th June 2003. I find it...
- Most Reliable European Ally - 16th June 2003, 23.1...
- Festering Perry de Haviland mentions this website...
- Basic Benevolence - 15th June 2003, 22.07 One of ...
- Missile Defence: A Secret Agreement - 15th June 20...
- How successful was the Daily Mail referendum? - 15...
- A Technical Oversight - 14th June 2003, 23.43 It ...
- The Publication of the Constitution - 14th June 20...
- Rapprochement - 12th June 2003, 22.38 Having warn...
- Paying the Price - 12th June 2003, 22.33 Belgium'...
- Matthew Barganier makes the point that the antiwar...
- The Press Conference - 11th June 2003, 22.35 In a...
- Have you voted yet? The Daily Mail's referendum i...
- Best of the Blogs I've been avoiding other blogs ...
- Welcoming Party The Tory MEP Dan Hannan writes "S...
- Freedom ain't Free The Chronicles web-log "Winds ...
- The Neville Chamberlain Fan Club Those of us who ...
- Support from those that count - 10th June 2003, 22...
- Will this be ready in forty five minutes as well? ...
- What do the Europhiles think? - 9th June 2003, 22....
- No News - 9th June 2003, 20.07 The announcement b...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 106 Thursday, 5 ...
- New York: The Intrepid - 6th June 2003 (I Think) ...
- Zimwatch: Still There Although it's getting hot i...
- Tony Ulbricht? Srdja Trifkovic thinks that Britai...
- Zimwatch: Kicking Off? Both myself and Mr Chaston...
- Will the Tories oppose the war now it's over? Mic...
-
▼
June
(50)
0 comments:
Post a Comment