Saturday, June 28, 2003
5:48 pm
From Red to Green: The Common Agricultural Policy and Variable Geometry - 28th June 2003, 17.43
The European Union, in practice, often deploys administrative and political variations at a national or regional level, in order to avoid the fundamental heresy of a division in the ranks. The negotiations undertaken at an intergovernmental level resemble cabinet government (on the British model) in that a unified settlement is presented to the observer in order to avoid breaking the fundamental European value of solidarity.
The "reforms" to the Common Agricultural Policy, announced on Thursday, were an example of this. They allowed the dissenting Member States like France to retain the old system of linking production to subsidy. However, whilst the original system was socialist in its economics, linking subsidies to production, the new system is based upon 'green' criteria: environmental standards, food safety and animal welfare. In practice, the 'milk quota' will be replaced by the number of pigs in a pen and how many hedges you plant.
These are not reforms. They are an attempt by the interested parties to maintain a subsidy for their rural sectors and, like all those paid, have found new ideological foundations for the flow of taxpayers' money. The level of subsidy does not decline, the price of food paid for by the European consumer does not fall, and the fixed prices so beloved of CAP bureaucrats are maintained. There was a small move towards a freer market:
But the price floor for butter will be cut by 25 per cent over four years while that for skimmed milk powder will fall 15 per cent over three years.
The shift towards the environment and rural development is known as modulation and the system for allocating funds may result in a further decline in the flow of CAP money to the farming sector in the UK. Epolitix rounds up the interested institutions who welcome the proposals and share a common assumption that the taxpayers shoudl subsidise rural communities and farms. A full summary of the changes in their ghastly glory may be read here.
The European Union, in practice, often deploys administrative and political variations at a national or regional level, in order to avoid the fundamental heresy of a division in the ranks. The negotiations undertaken at an intergovernmental level resemble cabinet government (on the British model) in that a unified settlement is presented to the observer in order to avoid breaking the fundamental European value of solidarity.
The "reforms" to the Common Agricultural Policy, announced on Thursday, were an example of this. They allowed the dissenting Member States like France to retain the old system of linking production to subsidy. However, whilst the original system was socialist in its economics, linking subsidies to production, the new system is based upon 'green' criteria: environmental standards, food safety and animal welfare. In practice, the 'milk quota' will be replaced by the number of pigs in a pen and how many hedges you plant.
These are not reforms. They are an attempt by the interested parties to maintain a subsidy for their rural sectors and, like all those paid, have found new ideological foundations for the flow of taxpayers' money. The level of subsidy does not decline, the price of food paid for by the European consumer does not fall, and the fixed prices so beloved of CAP bureaucrats are maintained. There was a small move towards a freer market:
But the price floor for butter will be cut by 25 per cent over four years while that for skimmed milk powder will fall 15 per cent over three years.
The shift towards the environment and rural development is known as modulation and the system for allocating funds may result in a further decline in the flow of CAP money to the farming sector in the UK. Epolitix rounds up the interested institutions who welcome the proposals and share a common assumption that the taxpayers shoudl subsidise rural communities and farms. A full summary of the changes in their ghastly glory may be read here.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
June
(50)
- Basra: Just Another Manic Monday - 30th June 2003,...
- Global Monitoring for the Environment and Security...
- The Sin of Omission - 29th June 2003, 17.13 The u...
- A World Peacekeeping Force - 29th June 2003, 11.46...
- I do not remember the BBC being biased against the...
- Mini Me's Foreign Policy - 28th June 2003, 20.48 ...
- From Red to Green: The Common Agricultural Policy ...
- Our Reward Six more British troops die at the han...
- Cato on the Withholding Tax - 25th June 2003, 23.3...
- Ten Pence for a cup of Tea Is there any kind soul...
- Delian Delights John Laughland says that NATO is ...
- State Funding for Political Parties - 24th June 20...
- An Unequal Partnership - 23rd June 2003, 22.59 Th...
- A Common Policy on Space - 23rd June 2003, 22.49 ...
- Thanksgiving - 23rd June 2003, 22.41 One of the e...
- Catch the Pigeon - 22nd June 2003, 20.04 Tony Bla...
- United Nations: Reform - 22nd June 2003, 17.28 A ...
- The Government's Position on the Euro - 22nd June ...
- Thessalonika - 19th June 2003, 23.23 The EU leade...
- Sanity Prevails - 19th June 2003, 23.07 It appear...
- Zimwatch: Blair and Bush will be tried as war crim...
- HMV - 18th June 2003, 23.26 Peter Mandelson write...
- A Consensus on North Korea - 18th June 2003, 23.01...
- Emotional Over Europe. 18th June 2003. I find it...
- Most Reliable European Ally - 16th June 2003, 23.1...
- Festering Perry de Haviland mentions this website...
- Basic Benevolence - 15th June 2003, 22.07 One of ...
- Missile Defence: A Secret Agreement - 15th June 20...
- How successful was the Daily Mail referendum? - 15...
- A Technical Oversight - 14th June 2003, 23.43 It ...
- The Publication of the Constitution - 14th June 20...
- Rapprochement - 12th June 2003, 22.38 Having warn...
- Paying the Price - 12th June 2003, 22.33 Belgium'...
- Matthew Barganier makes the point that the antiwar...
- The Press Conference - 11th June 2003, 22.35 In a...
- Have you voted yet? The Daily Mail's referendum i...
- Best of the Blogs I've been avoiding other blogs ...
- Welcoming Party The Tory MEP Dan Hannan writes "S...
- Freedom ain't Free The Chronicles web-log "Winds ...
- The Neville Chamberlain Fan Club Those of us who ...
- Support from those that count - 10th June 2003, 22...
- Will this be ready in forty five minutes as well? ...
- What do the Europhiles think? - 9th June 2003, 22....
- No News - 9th June 2003, 20.07 The announcement b...
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 106 Thursday, 5 ...
- New York: The Intrepid - 6th June 2003 (I Think) ...
- Zimwatch: Still There Although it's getting hot i...
- Tony Ulbricht? Srdja Trifkovic thinks that Britai...
- Zimwatch: Kicking Off? Both myself and Mr Chaston...
- Will the Tories oppose the war now it's over? Mic...
-
▼
June
(50)
0 comments:
Post a Comment