Friday, October 18, 2002
12:42 pm
The Transnationalist Right
With the recent arguments on transnationalist progressivism put forward by John Fonte of the Hudson Institute, there was a space that the concept did not appear to address. As W. James Antle III (great name!) of etherzone commented,
This is not to suggest that transnationalism is solely a prerogative of the left. There is also a transnational right that believes that the nation-state is becoming superfluous, or at least would like to help it become so.
Unfortunately, most of the possible analysis of a transnational conservatism or a transnational capitalism has been constructed by tired Marxists attacking the corporate boogieman. A more detailed argument is put forward by Eduardo Viola with a rather clumsy political model that invites criticism but it sets out some of the features of transnationalist conservatism.
The Conservative-globalists are in favor of open economies to the world market, a central role to the transnational corporations, a partial disarmament and a gradual improvement of the UN partially limiting the Nation State’s power in order to built a transnational authority based on a stratified structure of countries: empowerment of the Security Council (enlarged), the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization. The CG are the dominant force in the world system and they represent what is known as neoliberalism. Some examples of the CG are: predominant sectors from the great North American, West-European and Japanese parties, the modern sectors from the Brazilian center and right parties, the Chilean National Party, the modern sector from the Argentinean Justice Party (Cavallo), governing since 1989.
The transnationalist right in Britain includes such figures as Kenneth Clark, Michael Heseltine and other pro-eu and pro-euro conservatives. It might be argued that it also includes the Anglospherists and other conservative groups that put forward a cultural and political alternative to the European Union yet implicitly recognise the diminution of the nation-state on the global stage.
Whilst the tranzis (coined by David Carr of Samizdata, I believe), have been critiqued and rightly so, there does not appear to have been a focus on what transnationalism means for conservatives and libertarians.
With the recent arguments on transnationalist progressivism put forward by John Fonte of the Hudson Institute, there was a space that the concept did not appear to address. As W. James Antle III (great name!) of etherzone commented,
This is not to suggest that transnationalism is solely a prerogative of the left. There is also a transnational right that believes that the nation-state is becoming superfluous, or at least would like to help it become so.
Unfortunately, most of the possible analysis of a transnational conservatism or a transnational capitalism has been constructed by tired Marxists attacking the corporate boogieman. A more detailed argument is put forward by Eduardo Viola with a rather clumsy political model that invites criticism but it sets out some of the features of transnationalist conservatism.
The Conservative-globalists are in favor of open economies to the world market, a central role to the transnational corporations, a partial disarmament and a gradual improvement of the UN partially limiting the Nation State’s power in order to built a transnational authority based on a stratified structure of countries: empowerment of the Security Council (enlarged), the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization. The CG are the dominant force in the world system and they represent what is known as neoliberalism. Some examples of the CG are: predominant sectors from the great North American, West-European and Japanese parties, the modern sectors from the Brazilian center and right parties, the Chilean National Party, the modern sector from the Argentinean Justice Party (Cavallo), governing since 1989.
The transnationalist right in Britain includes such figures as Kenneth Clark, Michael Heseltine and other pro-eu and pro-euro conservatives. It might be argued that it also includes the Anglospherists and other conservative groups that put forward a cultural and political alternative to the European Union yet implicitly recognise the diminution of the nation-state on the global stage.
Whilst the tranzis (coined by David Carr of Samizdata, I believe), have been critiqued and rightly so, there does not appear to have been a focus on what transnationalism means for conservatives and libertarians.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
October
(82)
- L'ennemi américaine It is galling, when one argue...
- I Know It's Off-topic, but I Cannot Sit Back and W...
- Jumping the Gun D'Estaing may have miscalculated ...
- We must never be isolated in Europe No Longer.
- Foreign Travel & the Social Contract 28th October...
- Spot the difference A rather interesting piece co...
- Three in One Anne Applebaum strains to try to und...
- The hostage situation in Russia could never have h...
- Barnier's Barmy Army Michel Barnier, the European...
- Playing Chicken The diplomatic debate on authoris...
- Apres Moi, la deluge? Daniel arap Moi has been fo...
- The Naive Idiot Suddenly Blair finds that his new...
- The Transnationalist Right Part II When I wrote m...
- Bali - 24th October 2002 It is unlikely that thos...
- Good or Bad? - 24th October 2002 On the plus: thi...
- The problem with us Europhobes is... that we thin...
- What the Germans feel about Democracy We've gone ...
- The Anglosphere in Action Are the IRA acting in c...
- Bali Complications Can we say for certain that th...
- Does Al Qaeda exist? Al Qaeda changes its ways sa...
- What to do after the Referendum If we lose the re...
- Balancing Power Christopher Layne of the Cato ins...
- Just how special is that relationship? From The T...
- Hedging the bets John Simpson has "a nasty feelin...
- A deadlist, not an argument Isn’t it odd how thos...
- Tranris Philip Chaston talks about the Transnatio...
- Hindu Kush Watch A bit of a lefty rant this, but ...
- Dwarfed Alexander Cockburn sallies forth on the U...
- Usual FO Contempt for British Citizens 18th Octobe...
- How Bush could lose Not the war of course, but th...
- The Transnationalist Right With the recent argume...
- How Democracy works in Germany According to Die W...
- What is Corpus Juris Corpus Juris is the common b...
- High Watermark, not the end of the flood The fall...
- Shifting Sands So there's been a sharp rise in fa...
- Who runs the government? Governor of Bank of Fra...
- The Trots are with us It's not often that I'll li...
- Monopoly Money I know you're tired of my constant...
- The danger of moving targets A rather interesting...
- Where's Paddy? An interesting little analysis of ...
- Oils well that ends well An interesting article o...
- Changing European Assumptions of the United States...
- Eye witness report form the Hague - latest proceed...
- Whoops Britain in Europe have hired an economist ...
- The Unilateralist Iron Fist inside the Multilatera...
- Blair's Meetings These are usually a very good in...
- An Old Pattern Re-emerges...for the last time? Vi...
- Not Gagged Supposedly this article on MI6 pying B...
- The Cult gets it wrong James Bennett, high priest...
- Surrendering Champ Are they in a competition? Th...
- Raising the price Russia still wants more money f...
- What they think of Democracy If the Irish referen...
- And what's wrong with that? There are plenty of r...
- Tell us something we don't know Business groups s...
- Can the American Empire go on for ever? Yes says ...
- One For ... 8th October 2002 Jack Spencer, ...
- Three Voices Against War Sheldon Richman, of the ...
- Interventionists under the skin Brendan O'Neil di...
- A story of two inspectors Richard Butler is for w...
- Domestic Politics Intrusion I rarely comment on d...
- Profiling America This article from the National ...
- Falling Empires One of the reasons I've been scep...
- Globalising Parties What's so wrong with global p...
- Why the Tories still matter From the Telegraph: ...
- They couldn't organise a... 6th October 2002 It a...
- The Tory Contribution to the European Convention 5...
- A further view on the motives of Russia The Jerus...
- Resisting the empire An interesting proposal to a...
- The Euro and the Economy It looks like the Eurozo...
- They're cracking Seems like there are more ructio...
- The Opposition must oppose Says Malcolm Rifkind i...
- Fallout over Germany 3rd October 2002 Chancellor...
- Anglosphere Ferment Steven King asks what is the ...
- Israel & Anti-Semitism. 3rd October, 2002. My g...
- Leave the IMF A friend e-mailed this article. Ha...
- My last word on Germany I promise. This article ...
- Clinton bashes IDS The wages of sin are death, an...
- Diplomatic Tussles Clinton's speech was a "mesmer...
- The Sick Man of Europe One of the problems with t...
- Anti-Semtitism? Is being critical of Israel, or s...
- Desperate Remedies The Euro-fanatics are on the r...
- Doubting Whittam Smith The pundit speaks: I am al...
-
▼
October
(82)
0 comments:
Post a Comment