Thursday, October 31, 2002
9:51 pm
L'ennemi américaine
It is galling, when one argues for a rational analysis of the current international crises, to see that some European columnists are willing to live down to the stereotypes conjured up by the dhimmi brigade and the Eurabians.
What unsettles me even more is the crop of books studying or promoting anti-Americanism that have recently sold well in France: L’obsession anti-américaine by Jean-François Revel; Après l’empire by Emmanuel Todd and L’ennemi américaine by Philippe Roger.
Revel is a well-known conservative who has publicised many of the concerns about the fallacies of the left. A conversation between Revel and Todd revealed that the latter sociologist saw American actions as a sign of weakness rather than strength and that the "real strategic threat [to America], ...is that a nuclear Russia would ally itself with the two most important real power centers outside the United States, which are Europe and Japan".
Even an Arab writer noticed that Todd was the most enthusiastic of all the anti-American authors quoted, (along with the irrelevant and predictable aside on how well-represented the Jews are in France).
The US has sat up and noticed this surge of movement amongst French intellectuals. A forthcoming article by David Pryce-Jones in the National Review will review the books by Revel and Roger and has concluded
that anti-Americanism is not related to whatever the United States might actually be or do, but reflects murky depths of the French psyche. Persistent divisiveness and repeated social failure, general loss of influence in the world and injured pride, have solidified into an inferiority complex. Taking it for granted that France ought to be the world's leading power, French intellectuals have long been accustomed to seeing America as a standing reproach. As Philippe Roger puts it, hatred of America is nourished on a "violent contempt of oneself."
Some of the French intellectuals say that the United States acts out of weakness rather than strength due to fiscal and societal weaknesses. Others state that their own anti-Americanism is a sign of weakness rather than strength, a symptom of jealousy as they can no longer aspire to be top dog.
What I find unsettling is how France and, by extension, Europe are drowning in their own irrelevance and sleepwalking to possible disaster without getting a grip on the strategic realities that confront them. All of their skills in co-operation, mediation and negotiation will not save them from blackmail by missile toting states along their borders in the next decade. Do they dream of decadence?
It is galling, when one argues for a rational analysis of the current international crises, to see that some European columnists are willing to live down to the stereotypes conjured up by the dhimmi brigade and the Eurabians.
What unsettles me even more is the crop of books studying or promoting anti-Americanism that have recently sold well in France: L’obsession anti-américaine by Jean-François Revel; Après l’empire by Emmanuel Todd and L’ennemi américaine by Philippe Roger.
Revel is a well-known conservative who has publicised many of the concerns about the fallacies of the left. A conversation between Revel and Todd revealed that the latter sociologist saw American actions as a sign of weakness rather than strength and that the "real strategic threat [to America], ...is that a nuclear Russia would ally itself with the two most important real power centers outside the United States, which are Europe and Japan".
Even an Arab writer noticed that Todd was the most enthusiastic of all the anti-American authors quoted, (along with the irrelevant and predictable aside on how well-represented the Jews are in France).
The US has sat up and noticed this surge of movement amongst French intellectuals. A forthcoming article by David Pryce-Jones in the National Review will review the books by Revel and Roger and has concluded
that anti-Americanism is not related to whatever the United States might actually be or do, but reflects murky depths of the French psyche. Persistent divisiveness and repeated social failure, general loss of influence in the world and injured pride, have solidified into an inferiority complex. Taking it for granted that France ought to be the world's leading power, French intellectuals have long been accustomed to seeing America as a standing reproach. As Philippe Roger puts it, hatred of America is nourished on a "violent contempt of oneself."
Some of the French intellectuals say that the United States acts out of weakness rather than strength due to fiscal and societal weaknesses. Others state that their own anti-Americanism is a sign of weakness rather than strength, a symptom of jealousy as they can no longer aspire to be top dog.
What I find unsettling is how France and, by extension, Europe are drowning in their own irrelevance and sleepwalking to possible disaster without getting a grip on the strategic realities that confront them. All of their skills in co-operation, mediation and negotiation will not save them from blackmail by missile toting states along their borders in the next decade. Do they dream of decadence?
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
October
(82)
- L'ennemi américaine It is galling, when one argue...
- I Know It's Off-topic, but I Cannot Sit Back and W...
- Jumping the Gun D'Estaing may have miscalculated ...
- We must never be isolated in Europe No Longer.
- Foreign Travel & the Social Contract 28th October...
- Spot the difference A rather interesting piece co...
- Three in One Anne Applebaum strains to try to und...
- The hostage situation in Russia could never have h...
- Barnier's Barmy Army Michel Barnier, the European...
- Playing Chicken The diplomatic debate on authoris...
- Apres Moi, la deluge? Daniel arap Moi has been fo...
- The Naive Idiot Suddenly Blair finds that his new...
- The Transnationalist Right Part II When I wrote m...
- Bali - 24th October 2002 It is unlikely that thos...
- Good or Bad? - 24th October 2002 On the plus: thi...
- The problem with us Europhobes is... that we thin...
- What the Germans feel about Democracy We've gone ...
- The Anglosphere in Action Are the IRA acting in c...
- Bali Complications Can we say for certain that th...
- Does Al Qaeda exist? Al Qaeda changes its ways sa...
- What to do after the Referendum If we lose the re...
- Balancing Power Christopher Layne of the Cato ins...
- Just how special is that relationship? From The T...
- Hedging the bets John Simpson has "a nasty feelin...
- A deadlist, not an argument Isn’t it odd how thos...
- Tranris Philip Chaston talks about the Transnatio...
- Hindu Kush Watch A bit of a lefty rant this, but ...
- Dwarfed Alexander Cockburn sallies forth on the U...
- Usual FO Contempt for British Citizens 18th Octobe...
- How Bush could lose Not the war of course, but th...
- The Transnationalist Right With the recent argume...
- How Democracy works in Germany According to Die W...
- What is Corpus Juris Corpus Juris is the common b...
- High Watermark, not the end of the flood The fall...
- Shifting Sands So there's been a sharp rise in fa...
- Who runs the government? Governor of Bank of Fra...
- The Trots are with us It's not often that I'll li...
- Monopoly Money I know you're tired of my constant...
- The danger of moving targets A rather interesting...
- Where's Paddy? An interesting little analysis of ...
- Oils well that ends well An interesting article o...
- Changing European Assumptions of the United States...
- Eye witness report form the Hague - latest proceed...
- Whoops Britain in Europe have hired an economist ...
- The Unilateralist Iron Fist inside the Multilatera...
- Blair's Meetings These are usually a very good in...
- An Old Pattern Re-emerges...for the last time? Vi...
- Not Gagged Supposedly this article on MI6 pying B...
- The Cult gets it wrong James Bennett, high priest...
- Surrendering Champ Are they in a competition? Th...
- Raising the price Russia still wants more money f...
- What they think of Democracy If the Irish referen...
- And what's wrong with that? There are plenty of r...
- Tell us something we don't know Business groups s...
- Can the American Empire go on for ever? Yes says ...
- One For ... 8th October 2002 Jack Spencer, ...
- Three Voices Against War Sheldon Richman, of the ...
- Interventionists under the skin Brendan O'Neil di...
- A story of two inspectors Richard Butler is for w...
- Domestic Politics Intrusion I rarely comment on d...
- Profiling America This article from the National ...
- Falling Empires One of the reasons I've been scep...
- Globalising Parties What's so wrong with global p...
- Why the Tories still matter From the Telegraph: ...
- They couldn't organise a... 6th October 2002 It a...
- The Tory Contribution to the European Convention 5...
- A further view on the motives of Russia The Jerus...
- Resisting the empire An interesting proposal to a...
- The Euro and the Economy It looks like the Eurozo...
- They're cracking Seems like there are more ructio...
- The Opposition must oppose Says Malcolm Rifkind i...
- Fallout over Germany 3rd October 2002 Chancellor...
- Anglosphere Ferment Steven King asks what is the ...
- Israel & Anti-Semitism. 3rd October, 2002. My g...
- Leave the IMF A friend e-mailed this article. Ha...
- My last word on Germany I promise. This article ...
- Clinton bashes IDS The wages of sin are death, an...
- Diplomatic Tussles Clinton's speech was a "mesmer...
- The Sick Man of Europe One of the problems with t...
- Anti-Semtitism? Is being critical of Israel, or s...
- Desperate Remedies The Euro-fanatics are on the r...
- Doubting Whittam Smith The pundit speaks: I am al...
-
▼
October
(82)
0 comments:
Post a Comment