Friday, February 16, 2001
5:21 pm
Ireland, again
This is a reply to the e-mails logged on the site last week, from the "heterodox Iristh Catholic. I must stress that posting a viewpoint does not mean that I agree with it:
I know I shouldn't but I would like to reply to the idea voiced by some of the other e-mails you posted that suggested the dramatic decline in the size of the Protestant community in Eire was not the result of systematic official discrimination by Dublin.
I promise to be brief -- or as brief as I possibly can.
Eire actively promoted policies of discrimination against Protestants.
First, the constitution of Eire was sent to the Pope for approval that it was Catholic enough.
Second, the government of Eire approved the Catholic Church's position that children from Protestant-Catholic marriages must be raised Catholic.
Third, the government of Eire not only declared Catholicism the state religion but gave the Catholic Church effective control over education, press, broadcasting, and laws on marriage and contraception. Blasphemy, as defined by the Catholic Church, was made a crime. This was a direct assault by Eire and the Catholic Church on the right of Protestants to practice their religion, run their schools and publicly express their views.
Fourth, the government of Eire promoted religious apartheid to insure Protestant could not attend Catholic schools and civic associations.
Fifth the government of Eire did not believe Protestants were "Irish". Dublin viewed and treated Protestants as potential "fifth columnists". When Erskine Childers, a Protestant and an Irish nationalist, was assassinated, the assassination was justified by Kevin O'Higgins, Minister for Home Affairs, on the ground that Childers was an "Englishman". Yet, de Valera was considered "Irish" even though he was born in Brooklyn, USA and had a Spanish father. Until recently Protestants were effectively barred from holding the office of President, Prime Minister, or head of the military or police forces.
The creation of Northern Ireland as a State for Protestants was simply copying what Eire had already done of making the "south" a State for Catholics.
It should be remembered that between 1542 and 1760, first the Papal States, then Catholic Spain, and then Catholic France invaded or attempted to invade Ireland on least ten occasions. In other words, there was, on average, one invasion every 21 years.
The stated purpose at least for Rome and Madrid was to extirpate the Protestant religion from Ireland then use Ireland as base from which to invade England and extirpate the Protestant faith there. The problem was that for Rome and Madrid extirpating the Protestant faith meant exterminating the Protestant population.
Since independence, the government of Eire successfully realized the first objective in the "south" and has ever since endeavored to realize this goal in Northern Ireland.
This is a reply to the e-mails logged on the site last week, from the "heterodox Iristh Catholic. I must stress that posting a viewpoint does not mean that I agree with it:
I know I shouldn't but I would like to reply to the idea voiced by some of the other e-mails you posted that suggested the dramatic decline in the size of the Protestant community in Eire was not the result of systematic official discrimination by Dublin.
I promise to be brief -- or as brief as I possibly can.
Eire actively promoted policies of discrimination against Protestants.
First, the constitution of Eire was sent to the Pope for approval that it was Catholic enough.
Second, the government of Eire approved the Catholic Church's position that children from Protestant-Catholic marriages must be raised Catholic.
Third, the government of Eire not only declared Catholicism the state religion but gave the Catholic Church effective control over education, press, broadcasting, and laws on marriage and contraception. Blasphemy, as defined by the Catholic Church, was made a crime. This was a direct assault by Eire and the Catholic Church on the right of Protestants to practice their religion, run their schools and publicly express their views.
Fourth, the government of Eire promoted religious apartheid to insure Protestant could not attend Catholic schools and civic associations.
Fifth the government of Eire did not believe Protestants were "Irish". Dublin viewed and treated Protestants as potential "fifth columnists". When Erskine Childers, a Protestant and an Irish nationalist, was assassinated, the assassination was justified by Kevin O'Higgins, Minister for Home Affairs, on the ground that Childers was an "Englishman". Yet, de Valera was considered "Irish" even though he was born in Brooklyn, USA and had a Spanish father. Until recently Protestants were effectively barred from holding the office of President, Prime Minister, or head of the military or police forces.
The creation of Northern Ireland as a State for Protestants was simply copying what Eire had already done of making the "south" a State for Catholics.
It should be remembered that between 1542 and 1760, first the Papal States, then Catholic Spain, and then Catholic France invaded or attempted to invade Ireland on least ten occasions. In other words, there was, on average, one invasion every 21 years.
The stated purpose at least for Rome and Madrid was to extirpate the Protestant religion from Ireland then use Ireland as base from which to invade England and extirpate the Protestant faith there. The problem was that for Rome and Madrid extirpating the Protestant faith meant exterminating the Protestant population.
Since independence, the government of Eire successfully realized the first objective in the "south" and has ever since endeavored to realize this goal in Northern Ireland.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2001
(202)
-
▼
February
(38)
- A pre-election, indeed pre-primary, look at Bush's...
- Carville capersThe Sunday Mail was breathless yest...
- Another GemI never realised they had a website tim...
- Another primary source on the "Special Relationshi...
- Blair Reassures Bush on Europe Defense Force . Th...
- Post Box TimeOne piece, with my responses interlac...
- Blair fan Hugo Young, says that Blair should use t...
- With Iraq hit by new air strikes the U.S. May Have...
- The Independent also has quite a funny piece from ...
- Ken Livingston writes an anti-interventionist piec...
- Idle SpeculationWe all know about old Labour and N...
- Britain will pull military trainers out of Zimbabw...
- The Daily Telegraph writing a sensible piece on th...
- Robin Cook, in the Telegraph, saying that we're bo...
- Nazis believed in European unionTypically meek and...
- A bit of Clinton conspiracy by William Rees-Mogg i...
- A bit of Clinton conspiracy by William Rees-Mogg i...
- This wonderful vignette is from the Times Literary...
- Sorry to bore youA rather different reaction to on...
- Good article in The Times from Mick Hume:the maver...
- Two days ago the Baghdad Blitz was all over the pa...
- The Cold War II:Elena Bonner who grew upunder Stal...
- My column tomorow argues that Britain should not b...
- Its not going to be long before we're rogue states...
- Good leader from the Independent.Most of the plane...
- Matthew D'Anconna's take on the Iraq bombing. He'...
- It's times like this that you realise how a paper ...
- We're going inObviously with this crazy strike int...
- It's all Greek to meThank you to Philip Wilson for...
- On RealismA fairly good introduction to realism, f...
- Ireland, againThis is a reply to the e-mails logge...
- Archive LinksThis page has a set of links to all s...
- FeedbackMy piece on Ireland attracted some feedbac...
- AmmoWhile looking around for more Simon Jenkin's a...
- FeedbackI love America and I love Ireland, but the...
- I've had no response on my column yet. Has no one...
- In the papersThe Telegraph today is going on about...
- Sierra Leone's a stirringYou and I may never have ...
-
▼
February
(38)
0 comments:
Post a Comment