Thursday, February 22, 2001
12:08 am
Idle Speculation
We all know about old Labour and New Labour. Indeed we are all now aware of the difference between Blairites and Bownites. But what about friends of Cherie and friends of Tony? There are certain of Tony's friends who are also good friends of Cherie, Lord Irving is probably the most obvious example and Alisdair Campbell (his common-law wife is her personal assistant). And friends of Tony? Well there's Lord Falconer, who knew Tony Blair from school and then Peter Mandelson, who although he knows Cherie from their days together in inner London Labour politics, tends to know Tony far better (there are supposed to be reasons for his distance from the wife of the Prime Minister, but I'll leave that to others).
This brings me to the idle object of my speculation, Lord Irvine. Derry is in trouble. But surprisingly it is post dated trouble. All these Labour lawyers who are up in arms about this dinner invitation are up in arms about an invitation for a dinner (with Mrs Blair as guest of honour) that already happened. Why the time-delay? And why is Irvine being defended so assiduously by Mr Campbell, yet plenty of MPs seem to be briefing against him? Why would they do that if he was so close to the leader? Is it, I wonder, a revenge attack? If looking at the Blairites as friends of Tony vs. friends of Cherie - the friends of Tony have taken a tremendous pounding recently. Mandelson is out. Falconer is reeling from the Dome. The friends of Cherie are now in the ascendant within the Blairite camp. So is this a way of levelling things?
Is our ruling class narrower than we realise?
We all know about old Labour and New Labour. Indeed we are all now aware of the difference between Blairites and Bownites. But what about friends of Cherie and friends of Tony? There are certain of Tony's friends who are also good friends of Cherie, Lord Irving is probably the most obvious example and Alisdair Campbell (his common-law wife is her personal assistant). And friends of Tony? Well there's Lord Falconer, who knew Tony Blair from school and then Peter Mandelson, who although he knows Cherie from their days together in inner London Labour politics, tends to know Tony far better (there are supposed to be reasons for his distance from the wife of the Prime Minister, but I'll leave that to others).
This brings me to the idle object of my speculation, Lord Irvine. Derry is in trouble. But surprisingly it is post dated trouble. All these Labour lawyers who are up in arms about this dinner invitation are up in arms about an invitation for a dinner (with Mrs Blair as guest of honour) that already happened. Why the time-delay? And why is Irvine being defended so assiduously by Mr Campbell, yet plenty of MPs seem to be briefing against him? Why would they do that if he was so close to the leader? Is it, I wonder, a revenge attack? If looking at the Blairites as friends of Tony vs. friends of Cherie - the friends of Tony have taken a tremendous pounding recently. Mandelson is out. Falconer is reeling from the Dome. The friends of Cherie are now in the ascendant within the Blairite camp. So is this a way of levelling things?
Is our ruling class narrower than we realise?
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2001
(202)
-
▼
February
(38)
- A pre-election, indeed pre-primary, look at Bush's...
- Carville capersThe Sunday Mail was breathless yest...
- Another GemI never realised they had a website tim...
- Another primary source on the "Special Relationshi...
- Blair Reassures Bush on Europe Defense Force . Th...
- Post Box TimeOne piece, with my responses interlac...
- Blair fan Hugo Young, says that Blair should use t...
- With Iraq hit by new air strikes the U.S. May Have...
- The Independent also has quite a funny piece from ...
- Ken Livingston writes an anti-interventionist piec...
- Idle SpeculationWe all know about old Labour and N...
- Britain will pull military trainers out of Zimbabw...
- The Daily Telegraph writing a sensible piece on th...
- Robin Cook, in the Telegraph, saying that we're bo...
- Nazis believed in European unionTypically meek and...
- A bit of Clinton conspiracy by William Rees-Mogg i...
- A bit of Clinton conspiracy by William Rees-Mogg i...
- This wonderful vignette is from the Times Literary...
- Sorry to bore youA rather different reaction to on...
- Good article in The Times from Mick Hume:the maver...
- Two days ago the Baghdad Blitz was all over the pa...
- The Cold War II:Elena Bonner who grew upunder Stal...
- My column tomorow argues that Britain should not b...
- Its not going to be long before we're rogue states...
- Good leader from the Independent.Most of the plane...
- Matthew D'Anconna's take on the Iraq bombing. He'...
- It's times like this that you realise how a paper ...
- We're going inObviously with this crazy strike int...
- It's all Greek to meThank you to Philip Wilson for...
- On RealismA fairly good introduction to realism, f...
- Ireland, againThis is a reply to the e-mails logge...
- Archive LinksThis page has a set of links to all s...
- FeedbackMy piece on Ireland attracted some feedbac...
- AmmoWhile looking around for more Simon Jenkin's a...
- FeedbackI love America and I love Ireland, but the...
- I've had no response on my column yet. Has no one...
- In the papersThe Telegraph today is going on about...
- Sierra Leone's a stirringYou and I may never have ...
-
▼
February
(38)
0 comments:
Post a Comment