Thursday, December 09, 2004
6:40 am
Who would trust the government to draft a "simple and straightforward question" in a referendum on the Constitution? The supported draft amongst the politariat is quoted here:
Should the United Kingdom approve the treaty establishing a constitution for the European Union?
In the accompanying spin surrounding this question, the Herald has presented the above phrase as a victory for the Plain-Speaking brigade versus the Cabinet Europhiles who wish to draft a more skewed question for the referendum.
Except that this question is also wrong. The United Kingdom would not "approve", it would ratify the new Constitution. This requires a stronger question in order to inform the public that the European Constitution is a change of governance. Even this construction, described as neutral, would serve to confuse as some will vote Yes because they do not fully read or understand the issue, which this adminsitration hopes to neuter.
Any referendum question will be difficult to accept and politically contested. However, spin of Brownite battles with the Europhiles should be rejected, since no government can be trusted with such a vital duty.
Should the United Kingdom approve the treaty establishing a constitution for the European Union?
In the accompanying spin surrounding this question, the Herald has presented the above phrase as a victory for the Plain-Speaking brigade versus the Cabinet Europhiles who wish to draft a more skewed question for the referendum.
Except that this question is also wrong. The United Kingdom would not "approve", it would ratify the new Constitution. This requires a stronger question in order to inform the public that the European Constitution is a change of governance. Even this construction, described as neutral, would serve to confuse as some will vote Yes because they do not fully read or understand the issue, which this adminsitration hopes to neuter.
Any referendum question will be difficult to accept and politically contested. However, spin of Brownite battles with the Europhiles should be rejected, since no government can be trusted with such a vital duty.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(246)
-
▼
December
(21)
- Better Late than Never (30.12.2004) Here is a lin...
- Current British Tsunami Aid Private effort is pre...
- The Autonomous TransDonbass Republic? As the Ukra...
- Silent and Witless Peter Mandelson's ties to the ...
- Out of the Blue With a natural catastrophe of thi...
- The Scotsman features the thoughts of James Brando...
- Just a small article on those who feel that the pr...
- The Independent recently published an article on t...
- Due to the insurgency in Iraq, forecasts of Britis...
- The government announced the closure of 153 sovere...
- More Important Than Blunkett Anyone who proposes ...
- More on Kievan Rus Two apologies are in order. F...
- The Courts have decided that the Human Rights Act ...
- The unnecessary furore over the deployment of the ...
- Who would trust the government to draft a "simple ...
- The French and German governments have been enthus...
- German Lessons Germany is going to contribute tow...
- l
- Beware of the Enemy's Enemy About four times out ...
- In need of heroes There's a bit of a bitch fight ...
- I am profoundly thankful that during my formative ...
-
▼
December
(21)
0 comments:
Post a Comment