Tuesday, September 17, 2002
5:17 pm
Why the U.N.? – 17Sep02.
If I were an American hawk, I should be wary of invoking the United Nations in support of my case.
Either Iraq is a threat to America, or she is not. Who is best able to decide: the United Nations, or America herself? If Iraq is a threat to America, what does it matter whether the United Nations says she is not? If Iraq is not a threat to America, what would it matter if the United Nations said she were?
If Security Council resolutions need to be enforced to save the U.N.’s credibility, why are there glaring exceptions? Of course it is better that one resolution should be enforced rather than none; of course the inconsistency per se does no damage to U.S. interests; but expectations are bound to be raised & then disappointed. Is it really in America’s interests to have even more deeply disappointed Arabs in the world? Is it likely to help the “War on Terror”?
Why does the U.N.’s credibility matter? What credibility can an organisation devoted to “human rights” & stuffed full of bloodthirsty dictators & incompetents aspire to anyway? The greater the U.N.’s “credibility”, the greater the credibility of the anti-Western sentiment that preponderates within it. How is that in the interests of the United States?
No doubt America is merely using the U.N. as a convenient fig-leaf to hide her pursuit of her own perceived interests. And that’s fair enough. The attack on Iraq may well be less “destabilising” if it is carried out under the aegis of the U.N., & no doubt it is better for America if it is. But is it good for America to get into the habit of acting in her own most urgent interests only after the United Nations has been conciliated? I have my doubts.
Sometimes, of course, it is necessary to conciliate important countries who have the power to impede America’s pursuit of her interests. But the United Nations has no power. Why not discard the fig-leaf & proclaim to the world, “The most solemn moral duty of the government of the United States is to protect the people of the United States from violent death at the hands of her enemies. That is our priority, & that is what we shall do. If you object, you object; we have the power to silence objectors”?
It would be a bold proclamation; but when we know the safety of our citizens is at stake, we can afford to be bold.
Can’t we?
If I were an American hawk, I should be wary of invoking the United Nations in support of my case.
Either Iraq is a threat to America, or she is not. Who is best able to decide: the United Nations, or America herself? If Iraq is a threat to America, what does it matter whether the United Nations says she is not? If Iraq is not a threat to America, what would it matter if the United Nations said she were?
If Security Council resolutions need to be enforced to save the U.N.’s credibility, why are there glaring exceptions? Of course it is better that one resolution should be enforced rather than none; of course the inconsistency per se does no damage to U.S. interests; but expectations are bound to be raised & then disappointed. Is it really in America’s interests to have even more deeply disappointed Arabs in the world? Is it likely to help the “War on Terror”?
Why does the U.N.’s credibility matter? What credibility can an organisation devoted to “human rights” & stuffed full of bloodthirsty dictators & incompetents aspire to anyway? The greater the U.N.’s “credibility”, the greater the credibility of the anti-Western sentiment that preponderates within it. How is that in the interests of the United States?
No doubt America is merely using the U.N. as a convenient fig-leaf to hide her pursuit of her own perceived interests. And that’s fair enough. The attack on Iraq may well be less “destabilising” if it is carried out under the aegis of the U.N., & no doubt it is better for America if it is. But is it good for America to get into the habit of acting in her own most urgent interests only after the United Nations has been conciliated? I have my doubts.
Sometimes, of course, it is necessary to conciliate important countries who have the power to impede America’s pursuit of her interests. But the United Nations has no power. Why not discard the fig-leaf & proclaim to the world, “The most solemn moral duty of the government of the United States is to protect the people of the United States from violent death at the hands of her enemies. That is our priority, & that is what we shall do. If you object, you object; we have the power to silence objectors”?
It would be a bold proclamation; but when we know the safety of our citizens is at stake, we can afford to be bold.
Can’t we?
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(915)
-
▼
September
(69)
- Marching Season 150 000 may be less than half th...
- A little article in the Economist about how the Eu...
- Recolonisation States may be allowed to go bankru...
- Man recognises Britain does not have independent f...
- Why denigrate 'Interests'? Now that the midterm e...
- Cunning Charlie Maybe its what they call a meme, ...
- Saved by the Tories First the Countryside March a...
- Bush saves the Left A nice little piece from Chro...
- Adair Devil Slugger O'Toole has an interesting se...
- La La Land How Iraq might defeat the mighty U.S.A...
- Learn to love the bomb Boris Johnson waxes scepti...
- Odd According to the Torygraph the Iraq dossier h...
- The War Party and Peace Moves A website formed by...
- State of Play An interesting page on the Guardian...
- Africa again Britain sends troops to the Ivory Co...
- The Economy, Stupid Alan Bock asks Will War Wreck...
- Benefit of War Remember those worried about Sadda...
- The Dossier So they've let us see the dossier on ...
- Irrelevant Duncan Smith An article of mine has ap...
- Who you calling Hitler? Jim Henley makes a damn g...
- Iraq ain't fighting fair Jaundiced is one of my h...
- It didn't happen last time One of the unspoken as...
- A Political Party that actively supports the natio...
- Our European Partners Pro-Europeans are typically...
- Over the Pond "In the National Interest" has an i...
- Revenge of the Doves Charles Kennedy sees an adva...
- From the Front1 Conservative anti-interventionist...
- Europe Duffs up Britain Ambrose Evans-Pritchard h...
- I know that demos with CND types and Trots can be ...
- Who's the sick man of Europe now? More on the Ger...
- Taking a constitutional A disturbing letter to th...
- Will Ireland say NO again? I personally think tha...
- Global Police? Statewatchpoints to secret agreem...
- And they want to look after our money More on EU ...
- Woof Woof Iain Murray prompts me to read "An ally...
- The Anglosphere in a nutshell Forget the Anglosph...
- It's not just China German government pressures I...
- Never Knew That France frees Nazi collaborator, a...
- Problems in paradise This one slipped under my ra...
- The mainstream anti-war coalition may be full of d...
- The Principled UN in action UN divided over inspe...
- Why the U.N.? – 17Sep02. If I were an American ha...
- Imperium Whoever wrote this piece for the Scotsma...
- Belly of the Beast There's a Private Eye style ve...
- They've let them in ... but don't expect the Iraq...
- Another Offshore Island A writer from a small ser...
- UNdone The left wing peaceniks look like they've ...
- Oil No doubt there will be many, influenced by th...
- That Speech Justin Raimondo is jaundiced as ever ...
- Get the votes in The Economist sees a shift in Ge...
- Meeting There may be an interesting meeting tonig...
- A Tory MP thinks, shock Peter Ainsworth dares to ...
- As if the national interest mattered Iain Murray ...
- Geopolitics anyone? A new "European Geopolitical ...
- Gabb Again Another mention of Sean Gabb, this tim...
- Update on the European Convention Whereas everybo...
- Gerry goes East Electric Review is getting better...
- Forgetting our history Pat Buchanan has a great p...
- Europe's Coming Round to War It was only a couple...
- Devil or deep blue sea? David Carr over at Samizd...
- Death of an Empire Sean Gabb thinks that the Amer...
- Tory Splits. None Dead Maybe its a sign of irrel...
- The Blairites are coming out Another Blairite com...
- Competing Treacheries So the Tories have this mag...
- Scarier than Hitler, blah, blah, blah An interest...
- 0.00087% That great Kosovo triumph: Attacks on l...
- Beware False Friends. There are many reasons for ...
- Words of War I was going to sneer at Iain Duncan ...
- The Meaning of Patriotism Patriotism is love for ...
-
▼
September
(69)
0 comments:
Post a Comment