Saturday, August 02, 2003
6:09 pm
The Inquiry - 2nd August 2003, 18.07
The Grauniad published a more detailed biography of Lord Brian Hutton that provides further insights into the Law Lord appointed to chair the inquiry into the death of Kelly. He always wears a hat, lists no leisure activities in Who's Who and retains a reputation for being a judge's judge. However, his appointment will be no whitewash for the Blair government. In the trial of Patrick Nash, back in 1992, Hutton branded the defendant a "liar" and acquitted him because there was circumstantial evidence that the RUC had beaten him. His bearing in this case may guide the inquiry.
Much of that outlook-forming time in Northern Ireland took place during the Troubles, when judges were IRA targets, and lived with their families in a bulletproof, restricted world with little opportunity to encounter anti-establishment, counter-culture views outside the courtroom. There is little doubt that Hutton is a conservative figure, with a deeply-felt respect towards established institutions. But that respect seems to extend towards the letter of the law, and the judiciary as an independent body. He had no hesitation in calling Nash a liar; he did not call the RUC liars; but, in the end, Nash walked free. The judge had cast doubt on the veracity of both sides. A delicate, scrupulous, yet ultimately ambiguous, examination of the truth, and nobody in jail, and nobody resigning - could this be the outcome the government yearns for from the Hutton inquiry?
The government should be mindful of a public figure who places principles above political survival, even if they are delicately expressed through the subtle processes of the law. Already, documents thay may be viewed as relevant in the scheme of things have been found in rubbish bins and have only been rescued by security guards. It is a sad state of affairs when you can trust Group 4 more than the civil service to act in the public interest.
Now, Hutton has declared himself to be the law, quoting Scarman, and allowing the Guardian to indulge in their penchant for pop culture infodumps by mentioning Judge Dredd (although Hutton strikes me as more of a Judge Fargo).
"This inquiry is to be conducted - and I stress it - by myself," he said. "All the decisions have to be taken by me... it is I, and I alone, who will decide what witnesses will be called. I also decide to what matters their evidence will be directed." He was quoting Lord Justice Scarman in 1974.
Of course, this may all be for presentation but, I suspect, that Hutton will indulge in the cliche that the wheels of justice grind slowly. He promptly adjourned the inquiry until August 11th, presumably becuase most of the witnesses have left the country. Funny that.
The Grauniad published a more detailed biography of Lord Brian Hutton that provides further insights into the Law Lord appointed to chair the inquiry into the death of Kelly. He always wears a hat, lists no leisure activities in Who's Who and retains a reputation for being a judge's judge. However, his appointment will be no whitewash for the Blair government. In the trial of Patrick Nash, back in 1992, Hutton branded the defendant a "liar" and acquitted him because there was circumstantial evidence that the RUC had beaten him. His bearing in this case may guide the inquiry.
Much of that outlook-forming time in Northern Ireland took place during the Troubles, when judges were IRA targets, and lived with their families in a bulletproof, restricted world with little opportunity to encounter anti-establishment, counter-culture views outside the courtroom. There is little doubt that Hutton is a conservative figure, with a deeply-felt respect towards established institutions. But that respect seems to extend towards the letter of the law, and the judiciary as an independent body. He had no hesitation in calling Nash a liar; he did not call the RUC liars; but, in the end, Nash walked free. The judge had cast doubt on the veracity of both sides. A delicate, scrupulous, yet ultimately ambiguous, examination of the truth, and nobody in jail, and nobody resigning - could this be the outcome the government yearns for from the Hutton inquiry?
The government should be mindful of a public figure who places principles above political survival, even if they are delicately expressed through the subtle processes of the law. Already, documents thay may be viewed as relevant in the scheme of things have been found in rubbish bins and have only been rescued by security guards. It is a sad state of affairs when you can trust Group 4 more than the civil service to act in the public interest.
Now, Hutton has declared himself to be the law, quoting Scarman, and allowing the Guardian to indulge in their penchant for pop culture infodumps by mentioning Judge Dredd (although Hutton strikes me as more of a Judge Fargo).
"This inquiry is to be conducted - and I stress it - by myself," he said. "All the decisions have to be taken by me... it is I, and I alone, who will decide what witnesses will be called. I also decide to what matters their evidence will be directed." He was quoting Lord Justice Scarman in 1974.
Of course, this may all be for presentation but, I suspect, that Hutton will indulge in the cliche that the wheels of justice grind slowly. He promptly adjourned the inquiry until August 11th, presumably becuase most of the witnesses have left the country. Funny that.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
August
(39)
- Free Life Commentary Issue Number 110 Monday, 25 A...
- Zimwatch: Client State - 27th August 2003, 6.56 T...
- The Silly Season Is Over - 26th August 2003, 22.15...
- Are we building a funeral pyre? Sorry to use the ...
- Supping with the Devil - 23rd August 2003, 22.36 ...
- All our army According to "security expert" Micha...
- Greening the European Constitution - 23rd August 2...
- Why can't we have one? We have the scientists, we...
- Hutton: The Final Stretch - 22nd August 2003, 00.0...
- Airstrip One turns Blairite Well one aspect of th...
- Blairite before Blair - 20th August 2003, 23.05 B...
- Bet they won't publish you The Foreign and Common...
- Irony in Kabul Forget about the Edinburgh Fringe,...
- Day Five: An Imperfect Spy - 18th August 2003, 22....
- The Lions of Southall - 17th August 2003, 23.08 W...
- No-Conservatism Irving Kristol, first Neoconserva...
- Sour Grapes - 16th August 2003, 11.37 Apropos to ...
- You think I do conspiracies? So how's this for ta...
- Did they actually say that? The Last Ditch, a rat...
- The Stone Tape - 13th August 2003, 23.31 The comm...
- Forty-Eight Hours - 12th August 2003, 22.36 Now t...
- On the First Day... - 11th August 2003, 10.53 Lor...
- This Liberal Empire - 10th August 2003, 13.24 The...
- Nothing to report today I know there's stuff goin...
- Regarding Pinochet Every now and again I realise ...
- Demography is Depressing for Central Europe - 6th ...
- Demography is Destiny Stuart Reid runs through th...
- The Iraqi Gravy Train Well it was bound to happen...
- The Myth of an Impartial Authority - 5th August 20...
- Badly Spun Why on earth did Downing Street accuse...
- The Deepening of Anglo-American Co-operation on Mi...
- Why don't they just bus them in? Let's hope this ...
- Another Hint - 3rd August 2003, 17.53 The weakeni...
- Riding two horses - 3rd August 2003, 17.39 Mary D...
- Zimwatch: Body of Evidence This particularly nast...
- The Inquiry - 2nd August 2003, 18.07 The Grauniad...
- Reflections of a Guardian Browser Peter Briffa ge...
- Samizdata says we're all lefties now This entry o...
- Welcome to Kellyland Austin Mitchell has a new we...
-
▼
August
(39)
0 comments:
Post a Comment