Tuesday, September 21, 2004
8:58 am
How Howard can oppose the war without blushing
Fact 1. America is unpopular.
Fact 2. The Conservatives are unpopular
Fact 3. The Conservatives are especially unpopular with the American Government
So what are the Tories to do? It is now becoming clear that apart from a significant but declining minority that the Tories want to go into the next election oposing the war without appearing opportunistic. So how do they do this?
If the war gets much more unpopular they could just do a handbrake turn with very few negative consequances, however let's try to find a way in which they can back the national interest without appearing opportunistic (yes I know how it reads).
The answer comes from of all sources The Guardian. The paper among all the questions about the war asks "do you favour setting a deadline for the withdrawal of British troops?" 71% say they do.
Imagine Howard on a party political broadcast:
"The Conservatives supported the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. We still think that was right. However we do not support an open ended commitment to keeping British troops in the firing line. It is time for us to say that after a set date. On April 9th Baghdad will have been free for two years. We think that this is enough.
"We think that it was reasonable to have British troops in Iraq for a certain period of time, but two years starts to reek of permenence. We demand that British troops leave Iraq by April 9th, and we hope by well before then. If America doesn't like it, then tough. The job of the British government should be to defend British interests, not American, a job that the present government has failed."
Of course the fact that April 9th is likely to be weeks before the next election has no bearing on the date.
Fact 1. America is unpopular.
Fact 2. The Conservatives are unpopular
Fact 3. The Conservatives are especially unpopular with the American Government
So what are the Tories to do? It is now becoming clear that apart from a significant but declining minority that the Tories want to go into the next election oposing the war without appearing opportunistic. So how do they do this?
If the war gets much more unpopular they could just do a handbrake turn with very few negative consequances, however let's try to find a way in which they can back the national interest without appearing opportunistic (yes I know how it reads).
The answer comes from of all sources The Guardian. The paper among all the questions about the war asks "do you favour setting a deadline for the withdrawal of British troops?" 71% say they do.
Imagine Howard on a party political broadcast:
"The Conservatives supported the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. We still think that was right. However we do not support an open ended commitment to keeping British troops in the firing line. It is time for us to say that after a set date. On April 9th Baghdad will have been free for two years. We think that this is enough.
"We think that it was reasonable to have British troops in Iraq for a certain period of time, but two years starts to reek of permenence. We demand that British troops leave Iraq by April 9th, and we hope by well before then. If America doesn't like it, then tough. The job of the British government should be to defend British interests, not American, a job that the present government has failed."
Of course the fact that April 9th is likely to be weeks before the next election has no bearing on the date.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(246)
-
▼
September
(20)
- Rattlesnake Realism Niall Ferguson had pitched hi...
- The Lesson of Klinghoffer With the increasing num...
- Autonomy A report in the Turkish paper Zaman stat...
- Playing it safe Charlie felt that the voters were...
- Some Heartless Comments about Bigley Even I felt ...
- Quagmire Myths If a reporter were objective, they...
- How Howard can oppose the war without blushing Fa...
- Basra Watch: The 'War' Goes on.... The Kansas Cit...
- Dominating the High Frontier Undersecretary of th...
- The Clintonista Clinton was everybody'd best frie...
- Jaw-Jaw on War General Sir Michael Jackson remain...
- What about the UN? Can someone please enlighten m...
- Talking to a German Every now and again I talk to...
- Memory and the 'War on Terror' Over at Samizdata,...
- Unfinished Business One of the predictions trotte...
- A step closer to theocracy The war nerd comes out ...
- Who did leak to the Sun? The leak of Michael Howa...
- No War Blog A few interesting views and alternati...
- Is Mark Thatcher Alone? I do pick my moments to b...
- A System of Global Security For those in the Unit...
-
▼
September
(20)
0 comments:
Post a Comment