Monday, September 20, 2004
10:30 pm
Dominating the High Frontier
Undersecretary of the US AirForce, Peter B. Teets, has argued that the United States needs to achieve dominance in space, and has set out the necessary preconditions for achieving this objective.
Mr. Teets said the United States needs strong and enduring commitments in three areas to meet that goal: developing a professional space cadre, having a strong and well-funded industrial base, and maintaining a position at the leading edge of space technology.
The speech harked back to the history of American space development and how the 'Space Race' proved a natural stimulus. The speech did not set out any specific strategic goals and can be placed in the paradigm of scientific research, economic benefits and symbolic images that have characterised space up to the present day.
The rivals in this competition were identified:
"I know certain European countries have picked up the challenge and started to invest more heavily in leading-edge technology; certainly China has shown some of the same inclinations. We need to maintain a strong and vital space system research and technology endeavor going forward. That's what will keep us on the leading edge."
The speech was backward looking and traditional. Even in such contexts, the Bush administration is indicating that the United States remains wedded to its leadership role in space, identifies its strategic rivals and hints of future developments.
(22.43, 20th September 2004)
Undersecretary of the US AirForce, Peter B. Teets, has argued that the United States needs to achieve dominance in space, and has set out the necessary preconditions for achieving this objective.
Mr. Teets said the United States needs strong and enduring commitments in three areas to meet that goal: developing a professional space cadre, having a strong and well-funded industrial base, and maintaining a position at the leading edge of space technology.
The speech harked back to the history of American space development and how the 'Space Race' proved a natural stimulus. The speech did not set out any specific strategic goals and can be placed in the paradigm of scientific research, economic benefits and symbolic images that have characterised space up to the present day.
The rivals in this competition were identified:
"I know certain European countries have picked up the challenge and started to invest more heavily in leading-edge technology; certainly China has shown some of the same inclinations. We need to maintain a strong and vital space system research and technology endeavor going forward. That's what will keep us on the leading edge."
The speech was backward looking and traditional. Even in such contexts, the Bush administration is indicating that the United States remains wedded to its leadership role in space, identifies its strategic rivals and hints of future developments.
(22.43, 20th September 2004)
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(246)
-
▼
September
(20)
- Rattlesnake Realism Niall Ferguson had pitched hi...
- The Lesson of Klinghoffer With the increasing num...
- Autonomy A report in the Turkish paper Zaman stat...
- Playing it safe Charlie felt that the voters were...
- Some Heartless Comments about Bigley Even I felt ...
- Quagmire Myths If a reporter were objective, they...
- How Howard can oppose the war without blushing Fa...
- Basra Watch: The 'War' Goes on.... The Kansas Cit...
- Dominating the High Frontier Undersecretary of th...
- The Clintonista Clinton was everybody'd best frie...
- Jaw-Jaw on War General Sir Michael Jackson remain...
- What about the UN? Can someone please enlighten m...
- Talking to a German Every now and again I talk to...
- Memory and the 'War on Terror' Over at Samizdata,...
- Unfinished Business One of the predictions trotte...
- A step closer to theocracy The war nerd comes out ...
- Who did leak to the Sun? The leak of Michael Howa...
- No War Blog A few interesting views and alternati...
- Is Mark Thatcher Alone? I do pick my moments to b...
- A System of Global Security For those in the Unit...
-
▼
September
(20)
0 comments:
Post a Comment