Tuesday, November 25, 2003
10:56 pm
Rowing the boat back upstream to Nice
At first, the extraordinary statements emanating from Whitehall seemed to be the latest in a long series of negotiating ploys designed to strengthen Britain's hand in the intergovernmental negotiations over the European Constitution. The defence of the "redlines", placed in The Times and The Daily Telegraph, was designed to shore up perceptions that Blair was not negotiating in Europe on Britain's behalf. It was rather poor spinning from a government that used to pride itself on setting each day's political agenda, since the placement of the statements was obvious and crude.
The primary question was whether these expressions were issued for the domestic political agenda or were they designed to send a message to other countries within Europe. Given the internecine divisions that have dogged the negotiations over the last few weeks, especially as Spain and Poland refuse to give up their voting rights under the Nice Treaty, the possibility of political failure has become a plausible scenario. Blair could be attempting to capitalise on this failure by portraying himself as a dogged defender of Britain's interests, knowing that the chances of further integraton have actually diminished.
The same position was written into Brown's speech, with a similar emphasis on so far and no further to extensions of qualified majority voting, rather than say, further integration:
"We are making clear in these discussions that we are standing up for British interests.
"We have red lines and we are insisting on unanimity for tax, social security and defence."
On the whole, these speeches were for domestic consumption, rather than acting as manifestos for pre-negotiating positions. They were priming the public for the possible failure of negotiations over the European Constitution (rowing the boat back upstream to Nice) and providing an additional patriotic fillip for the beleaguered government whose earlier enthusiasm looks increasingly out of step with political reality.
However, the fact that the government is considering this posssibility must be good news.
(22.55, 25th November 2003)
At first, the extraordinary statements emanating from Whitehall seemed to be the latest in a long series of negotiating ploys designed to strengthen Britain's hand in the intergovernmental negotiations over the European Constitution. The defence of the "redlines", placed in The Times and The Daily Telegraph, was designed to shore up perceptions that Blair was not negotiating in Europe on Britain's behalf. It was rather poor spinning from a government that used to pride itself on setting each day's political agenda, since the placement of the statements was obvious and crude.
The primary question was whether these expressions were issued for the domestic political agenda or were they designed to send a message to other countries within Europe. Given the internecine divisions that have dogged the negotiations over the last few weeks, especially as Spain and Poland refuse to give up their voting rights under the Nice Treaty, the possibility of political failure has become a plausible scenario. Blair could be attempting to capitalise on this failure by portraying himself as a dogged defender of Britain's interests, knowing that the chances of further integraton have actually diminished.
The same position was written into Brown's speech, with a similar emphasis on so far and no further to extensions of qualified majority voting, rather than say, further integration:
"We are making clear in these discussions that we are standing up for British interests.
"We have red lines and we are insisting on unanimity for tax, social security and defence."
On the whole, these speeches were for domestic consumption, rather than acting as manifestos for pre-negotiating positions. They were priming the public for the possible failure of negotiations over the European Constitution (rowing the boat back upstream to Nice) and providing an additional patriotic fillip for the beleaguered government whose earlier enthusiasm looks increasingly out of step with political reality.
However, the fact that the government is considering this posssibility must be good news.
(22.55, 25th November 2003)
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
November
(33)
- Blair Out George Galloway's new way, hoping to un...
- Compromised Initial indications show that the mee...
- The House of the Result of the Result Donald Rums...
- Blair's Bluster I must admit that I thought the s...
- Rowing the boat back upstream to Nice At first, t...
- Square Wheels President Chirac, Prime Minister Ra...
- Al-Qaeda: Conspiracy, Network or Ideology? Al-Qae...
- In areas where it counts This is an old report fr...
- No title
- Hadrian and the Neo-Cons Not a particularly bad b...
- Eastern Promise Another small straw in the wind o...
- Right Now Article on the Neo-conservatives.
- Visions of the Future Although assumptions that d...
- So that's what Portillo was offered The shadow ca...
- Cuts masquerading as 'flexibility' Lord Bach, Min...
- This one will hit paydirt This is one lawsuit tha...
- Fading Horizons What do you say when arch-federal...
- Self Delivering Leaflets A new technological brea...
- Onwards and Upwards On a related note, here is a ...
- Rivals An article in the Christian Science Monito...
- Michael Howard and the Conservative Party: Dracula...
- I thought this would be on Slugger as it is one of...
- Blair waffles on about the European Constitution: ...
- Basra appears to be one city that is stable and en...
- A British marine was shot dead in a covert operati...
- US Bases and Lost Property Another ally of the Un...
- Banned Snow White and the Seven Asylum Seekers ha...
- Side-effects of the Constitution The European Con...
- Brian Micklethwaite recently posted about Blair's ...
- Michael Howard and Europe On Sean Gabb's candidli...
- Gibraltar Precedent It came too late for the Chag...
- Why the EU is (becoming) a modern state Whenever ...
- Does Gibraltar really want to be part of the EU? ...
-
▼
November
(33)
0 comments:
Post a Comment