Sunday, May 18, 2003
11:45 am
Run like a CND camp
Most antiwar protestors protested against the war against Iraq because they saw it as coldblooded. They were wrong. The war against Iraq was wrong because no coldblooded calculation of national interest (especially the British national interest) could justify this. We were being led by deluded fools, whether the ex-Trotskyite neo-conservatives in Washington or our happy-clappy Prime Minister.
To see the wild-eyed idealism of the pro-war party one should only look at the occupation, which to use a politically incorrect term looks like it's run by spastics[1]. They simply don't seem to know how to run the place. All you need is the Boys Own Guide to running the Fuzzy-Wuzzies and you could do a better job. Here's some multiple choice questions for some wannabe imperialists.
If there is a looting spree and your soldiers are in charge should they:
(1) impose martial law and then clamp down mercilessly
(2) fire at crowds who are looting places you'll need in a couple of months time like shops and hospitals or
(3) say not our job guv
You need to appoint an administrator to the new area, do you choose:
(1) A military man with no connection to the feuding parties with experience of running a millitary occupation, or
(2) A diplomatic expert with a knowledge of the area and language
(3) One of your defence minister's mates who is a fanatical Zionist and couldn't run a whelk stall
You have a number of functionaries of the old ruling class but a shortage of other decent administrators, do you:
(1) Work with them, they know how to operate the place
(2) Weed out the bad apples and bribe and threaten the rest to change their loyalty
(3) Make a play about getting rid of the lot of them and look weak as you choose Baathists to run various parts of the machine as they were the "only ones around"
If you answered mostly (1) then you are French. If you answered mostly (2) then congratulations, you have won the first prize in the lottery of life and you are British. Those who answered mostly (3) really shouldn't think that just because they've got a decent military that they can run an Empire. That's simply sufferering delusions of competence. It's time to reprint that Boy's Own guide.
[1] I do of course apologise to sufferers of cerebral palsy, and I realise that their crippling physical condition in no way represents a mental disability. And yes, you could run the occupation of Iraq better than the Yanks, and to compare you with them does make you seem far more inept and incompetent than anyone has any right to believe.
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(696)
-
▼
May
(47)
- The Things they say First they say that the const...
- Blogging on the Constitution - 28th May 2003, 23.0...
- More arrogance - 27th May 2003, 23.30 Hain showed...
- The Union's Institutions - 27th May 2003, 23.03 T...
- Discussion on the Constitution - 27th May 2003, 16...
- The European Constitution - 26th May 2003, 23.14 ...
- All Eyes on the Constitution - 26th May 2003, 12.1...
- Anti-War, Pro-Europe - 26th May 2003, 1.12 Tom Sp...
- The Sun says... - 25th May 2003, 23.12 As a follo...
- The Conspiracy - 25th May 2003, 22.55 The Observe...
- Nul point - 25th May 2003, 3.04 Just back from Su...
- Congo Intervention - 24th May 2003, 20.33 No doub...
- So far and no further - 24th April 2003, 16.57 Jo...
- The Referendum The Daily Mail referendum is one o...
- Time to go home Lew Rockwell attempts an economic...
- Losing value against what? The Mises Institute ha...
- Yet another reason to leave the EU Demography is ...
- Not an Imperial People Now it seems that Colonel ...
- Euro Logic So we should join the Euro because of ...
- How divisive is Europe? - 19th May 2003, 10.45 Ve...
- Slovakia - 19th May 2003, 22.28 Slovakia said yes...
- La Haine - 19th May 2003, 22.17 Hain recently cal...
- Decisions, Decisions - 18th May 2003, 22.38 Gordo...
- Run like a CND camp Most antiwar protestors prote...
- Zimwatch: When will we emigrate to Baghdad? - 16th...
- Basra - 16th May 2003, 20.12 The situation in Bas...
- Roll on the Referendum - 15th May 2003, 23.30 Ana...
- How to say a lot about very little - 15th May 2003...
- Krieg der Illusionen - 12th May 2003, 23.10 The 1...
- Lithuania - 12th May 2003, 22.52 Lithuania voted,...
- So you want to do something about Europe? The pre...
- A Critical Atlanticist - 8th May 2003, 23.54 Malc...
- The Iraqi archives - 8th May 2003, 23.16 Insight ...
- Hear, Hear for Heffer - 8th May 2003, 22.19 Altho...
- EU-CIS: A New Marketplace - 7th May 2003, 23.55 V...
- The next big battleground is tax - 7th May 2003, 2...
- Another reason for kicking the American Left - 7th...
- Action by example - 7th May 2003, 11.17 There is...
- Do not confuse neoconservatism with neoconservatis...
- CSIS: Euro-Focus - 5th May 2003, 18.00 The Centre...
- Finnish opposition to a "closed defence core" - 5t...
- German support for the European Army - 5th May 200...
- Zimwatch: Three Kings watch over negotiations - 5t...
- The Future of Europe: A Neo-Conservative Viewpoint...
- Will Tony Blair Resign If He Turns Out to Have Lie...
- So what's the problem Crispin Blunt has resigned ...
- Direct Hits on HMS Blair - 1st May 2003, 22.20 Th...
-
▼
May
(47)
0 comments:
Post a Comment