Saturday, February 28, 2004
11:07 pm
Galileo
The EU and the US have completed their negotiations on Galilieo.
They agreed to adopt a common signal for certain services and to preserve national security capabilities. The agreement marks the end of three years of transatlantic negotiations.
The press release does not mention the worries that the US had over EU communications interfering with their own M-band. However, CNet report that the EU backed down and accepted frequencies that it had earlier rejected in order to avoid degrading US military capabilities.
"We have now agreed on signal structures that will not degrade the navigation warfare capabilities of U.S. and military forces," said Ralph Braibanti, director of the State Department's Office of Space and Advanced Technology.
"It was never the U.S. view that we wanted to block Galileo. It is true that when Galileo was in the hypothetical phase we had reservations about it," he told a news conference.
A possible example of governmental (Member State) interests engineering concessions to the US?
(23.08, 28th February 2004)
The EU and the US have completed their negotiations on Galilieo.
They agreed to adopt a common signal for certain services and to preserve national security capabilities. The agreement marks the end of three years of transatlantic negotiations.
The press release does not mention the worries that the US had over EU communications interfering with their own M-band. However, CNet report that the EU backed down and accepted frequencies that it had earlier rejected in order to avoid degrading US military capabilities.
"We have now agreed on signal structures that will not degrade the navigation warfare capabilities of U.S. and military forces," said Ralph Braibanti, director of the State Department's Office of Space and Advanced Technology.
"It was never the U.S. view that we wanted to block Galileo. It is true that when Galileo was in the hypothetical phase we had reservations about it," he told a news conference.
A possible example of governmental (Member State) interests engineering concessions to the US?
(23.08, 28th February 2004)
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(246)
-
▼
February
(22)
- Imperial Capabilities The article by David Marqua...
- Galileo The EU and the US have completed their ne...
- The Geopolitics of the Left Suez is recognised by...
- A Government of Promiscuous Buggers? No, I'm not ...
- Pan-Am Proliferation James Steingold, a staff wri...
- EIA Suggestions one year become practical reality...
- Kerry advocates US interference in Northern Irelan...
- Zimwatch: Even the Communists agree... The South ...
- The Travails of British Aerospace British Aerospa...
- The Secret Wind If it is, it is an informal one. ...
- PFI One of the government's favourite swizzes to ...
- A way out for the Tories? The Conservatives have ...
- Nearly Normal Germany An analysis of German power...
- How about another variable relationship? Philip C...
- Repatriation used to be a dirty word In the 1970s...
- Swedish Eurorealism A new Swedish party, called t...
- Suez and the Iraqi Crisis William Keegan in The O...
- Bad Intelligence =Stupidity? Discuss The intellig...
- Further thoughts on Hutton The remit of the Hutto...
- More Stick, Less Carrot The Foreign Affairs Commi...
- The Direct Democratic Deficit Many of the politic...
- Self-Determination in a European Context How demo...
-
▼
February
(22)
0 comments:
Post a Comment