Saturday, August 28, 2004
12:47 pm
An Aid to Constructive Thinking
Both 'The Times' and 'The Daily Mail' have publicised a revelation from 'The Sun' that Michael Howard has been prohibited from visiting the Republican Convention and meeting President Bushin the White House. This is considered suitable punishment for the Tories indecision over cheerleading for the War in Iraq, since they were expected to line up behind Blair, no matter the electoral damage that has been inflicted.
The articles are non-linkable at present and a Google search has revealed nothing as yet. All of the Murdoch articles spin this as an embarrassment for Howard. However, this ban could propel elements in the Tory Party to wonder why they should slavishly follow the American line, when it appears to involve passing up opportunities to reduce the socialist hold on Britain. It probably won't do Howard any harm either: most people dislike Bush over here and by publicising this prohibition, Howard could make in-roads into the disaffected conservative vote that views Iraq as a quagmire. (There are more than you think.)
(13.00, 28th August 2004)
Both 'The Times' and 'The Daily Mail' have publicised a revelation from 'The Sun' that Michael Howard has been prohibited from visiting the Republican Convention and meeting President Bushin the White House. This is considered suitable punishment for the Tories indecision over cheerleading for the War in Iraq, since they were expected to line up behind Blair, no matter the electoral damage that has been inflicted.
The articles are non-linkable at present and a Google search has revealed nothing as yet. All of the Murdoch articles spin this as an embarrassment for Howard. However, this ban could propel elements in the Tory Party to wonder why they should slavishly follow the American line, when it appears to involve passing up opportunities to reduce the socialist hold on Britain. It probably won't do Howard any harm either: most people dislike Bush over here and by publicising this prohibition, Howard could make in-roads into the disaffected conservative vote that views Iraq as a quagmire. (There are more than you think.)
(13.00, 28th August 2004)
Links
- Ishtar Talking
- Korea Life Blog
- Toothing
- Academic Secret
- Genius Duck
- Hairstyles and Nails
- Home Tips
- Health Talk and You
- Beadle Beads
- Glass Beads Supplies
- Paquet Full of Glass
- Native American Jewelry
- Blogopoly
- Second String Swap
- Work at Home News
- Bashhh
- Click Here
- Click Here
- Just Another Opinion Blog
- Dip Dot
- Awryt
- Zacquisha
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(246)
-
▼
August
(16)
- The Great Rift Valley The Guardian has demonstrat...
- An Aid to Constructive Thinking Both 'The Times' ...
- Foreign Policy: A Rising Concern Further to the a...
- Organising the Muslim Vote The Left, from the pol...
- What to do with the Shias? It may be August, but ...
- Let them hang chi-chi gal The current furore over...
- Georgia: Stable Ally or Forthcoming Flashpoint Ma...
- MisDirection An important article in Foreign Affa...
- Do We Really Want to be Mixed up with Religious Bi...
- Isolationism best left alone If there is any reas...
- First they burn our monastaries. Now this. In Eng...
- This is the law, not a war One of the overarching...
- What, another Eurofighter? Generally I've been fa...
- Darfur: What is to be done? The first indications...
- Darfur: An Intervention Too Far How the Chief of ...
- Hayek and the Oil Price It's early days, but has ...
-
▼
August
(16)
0 comments:
Post a Comment